I would put serious money on an Israeli attack before the election.
Tom Send a noteboard - 14/03/2012 02:56:55 PM
To my mind, they WILL attack. It's not a question of if, it's a question of when. If Netanyahu is smart, he will force the issue prior to the election because afterwards Barry won't help him at all, and he knows it. Late May seems the most likely time in my opinion. Netanyahu can say he gave sanctions almost 3 months more to work, and yet it's early enough that it affects the campaign in a major way in the US.
The Iranians will retaliate. The only question is whether they will actually attack any US assets, international shipping, etc. Although I agree with Admiral Dempsey that they are a "rational actor", they are becoming less rational with every day.
This isn't like the Greek debt default, where everyone was committed to a particular outcome because the others were too unpredictable. You can't count on Israeli and Iranian restraint.
The Iranians will retaliate. The only question is whether they will actually attack any US assets, international shipping, etc. Although I agree with Admiral Dempsey that they are a "rational actor", they are becoming less rational with every day.
This isn't like the Greek debt default, where everyone was committed to a particular outcome because the others were too unpredictable. You can't count on Israeli and Iranian restraint.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
can *any* republican pose a challenge to obama in november?
14/03/2012 04:06:59 AM
- 1179 Views
Yes, absolutely.....
14/03/2012 04:12:30 AM
- 631 Views
"anybody but obama" is not a winning strategy
14/03/2012 02:28:23 PM
- 611 Views
It can definitely work.....don't compare 2012 to 2004.
14/03/2012 02:44:39 PM
- 478 Views
this is why it will be 2004 all over again if romney is nominated
16/03/2012 02:22:26 PM
- 517 Views
It sure as Hell is, as long as the candidate is moderate
14/03/2012 03:04:10 PM
- 725 Views
Did you vote for Obama in 2008?
14/03/2012 03:47:55 PM
- 481 Views
Yes I did. If Romney is the candidate, I will vote Romney this year. *NM*
14/03/2012 08:39:41 PM
- 329 Views
Strongly qualifying your statement really weakens the "anyone". *NM*
14/03/2012 10:14:45 PM
- 344 Views
The statement "anyone but Obama" can be a rallying cry, but only for the right candidates.
16/03/2012 01:47:48 AM
- 633 Views
somehow i don't see romney having much credibility versus obama
16/03/2012 02:16:32 PM
- 517 Views
Spoken like a true Obama partisan
16/03/2012 04:18:21 PM
- 531 Views
actually, i did not vote for obama in 2008 and i won't this time either
17/03/2012 01:02:09 PM
- 560 Views
Sure, if Israel hits Iran and Obama looks weak.
14/03/2012 04:56:23 AM
- 633 Views
i think iran/israel is probably the biggest issue at the moment
14/03/2012 02:25:29 PM
- 636 Views
I would put serious money on an Israeli attack before the election.
14/03/2012 02:56:55 PM
- 633 Views
I know that I would consider voting for Romney
14/03/2012 01:05:47 PM
- 608 Views
If you will pardon an impertinent question: Why?
14/03/2012 03:26:01 PM
- 588 Views
Because Obama is a complete and utter failure.....
14/03/2012 03:44:14 PM
- 525 Views
Again, I get Republicans voting Anybody but Obama, but not how anyone can be comfortable w/ Romney.
14/03/2012 04:06:14 PM
- 662 Views
Pre-convention only the incumbents favorability ratings matter much
14/03/2012 01:19:04 PM
- 621 Views
obama is not popular, but at least he has the ability to organize a national campaign
14/03/2012 02:18:04 PM
- 563 Views
No, the democratic party does, so does the GOP
14/03/2012 03:16:31 PM
- 635 Views
That's true- despite how divisive the primaries seem, the GOP will unite behind the winner
14/03/2012 03:44:16 PM
- 656 Views
Re: That's true- despite how divisive the primaries seem, the GOP will unite behind the winner
14/03/2012 03:59:25 PM
- 587 Views
Actually, my experience has been a lot of libs mean it when they say they will not for anyone.
14/03/2012 04:19:46 PM
- 450 Views
I don't want to grossly over-generalize but there are distinct trends to party demographics
14/03/2012 06:04:09 PM
- 664 Views
I was thinking no, and here's my rationale:
14/03/2012 03:41:21 PM
- 548 Views
Much as it pains me to agree with trzaska, he is absolutely right in this case.
14/03/2012 04:21:43 PM
- 757 Views
Interesting. So you guys are basically saying I'm right, but it might not matter
14/03/2012 04:53:48 PM
- 619 Views
Yeah, pretty much, and I would even say that is the trend in all Dem vs. Rep elections.
14/03/2012 04:59:30 PM
- 648 Views
Yes and no
14/03/2012 06:23:47 PM
- 737 Views
Conservative cookies nomz. But I think you missed my main point...
14/03/2012 07:02:10 PM
- 588 Views
Conservative cookies nomz. But I think you missed my main point...
14/03/2012 07:09:24 PM
- 504 Views
And the cookies are not a lie... at last night's meeting, we had Thin Mints
15/03/2012 09:51:30 PM
- 620 Views
Yeah, I just meant perception
16/03/2012 02:39:30 AM
- 618 Views
One day Republicans and internet trolls alike will learn not to say weird shit to people like me.
15/03/2012 12:30:17 AM
- 692 Views
I like this post.
15/03/2012 08:40:07 PM
- 563 Views
I don't mean to disrespect your seal, but it looks more like a cat. *NM*
15/03/2012 08:52:26 PM
- 216 Views
You've obviously never heard of a kitten seal, Mr. I-Write-An-Animal-Blog. *NM*
15/03/2012 09:38:47 PM
- 332 Views
Maybe it's a leopard seal. That someone put a cat-ear band on. *NM*
15/03/2012 10:07:46 PM
- 231 Views
Does it matter if they do? At this point, does it matter who is president? Probably not.
16/03/2012 02:11:45 AM
- 680 Views