Active Users:1189 Time:22/11/2024 08:42:17 PM
Either way, although Joel does frequently post rants, reposting a Telegraph article is hardly that. Tom Send a noteboard - 19/02/2012 05:31:23 PM
Wikipedia says that in 2008 the claim was disproven on the basis of DNA. If the Telegraph is revisiting the story, I would suspect that there is new evidence or some reason the DNA connection failed.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Hitler Had Son with French Teen - 19/02/2012 07:15:10 AM 1308 Views
I see you're still posting sensationalist bullshit without seeing if it's been debunked - 19/02/2012 08:33:36 AM 903 Views
<3 *NM* - 19/02/2012 08:59:14 AM 218 Views
I'm intrigued by your choice of source to link to. - 19/02/2012 10:02:11 AM 560 Views
Not that the Telegraph is a paragon of unbiased journalism, but I tend to believe them. - 19/02/2012 04:20:05 PM 595 Views
Larry is right that the story seems to have been around for decades. - 19/02/2012 04:40:50 PM 668 Views
Either way, although Joel does frequently post rants, reposting a Telegraph article is hardly that. - 19/02/2012 05:31:23 PM 592 Views
I saw it in the references part of that Wiki article - 19/02/2012 09:35:25 PM 649 Views
Do not shoot the messenger. - 19/02/2012 06:18:57 PM 879 Views

Reply to Message