Pretty much he has done accounting math to obtain everything he wanted but get rid of the complaints.
but I do think he's accomplishing what he meant to, which is important for me. The polls aren't killing him because this is what many women (and I have to assume men?) secretly want - it infuriates me that many of them won't say this in front of their peers for fear of judgement, but it still shows that there is a silent majority in favor of affordable contraception. (I point this out as someone who has recently been discussing tooooooo much with several different types of female friends/family members. I can't say it makes me completely correct, but the comments certainly seem to support me.)
Joel, I love you, but I can no longer read your "Obama bomb" posts, so I have no idea what other discussion is happening here, and will be leaving now. You sound like triscuit. Ugh.
I cannot really blame you. I am just frustrated, disillusioned and bitter over Obama turning out to be yet another Republican Lite Democrat and what those policies are doing to the nation and world. This is not a win for womens health. That depends on insurers agreeing to offer free contraceptive coverage because 1) It makes economic sense (they would already give free coverage if it were that simple) and 2) they want in on insurance exchanges that will not exist until two years from now.
Do not hold your breath. But Obama can yet again tell progressives he delivered for us even though he actually abandoned us, and the torch-wielding villagers sick of puritanical robber barons will go out and vote for him again because "he fights for us." No one fights for us; America is every man for himself now.
It seems to me that you're too far to the left to view it clearly - America is simply NOT that progressive yet, and Obama is going back to pretty much where he has to be. I won't claim that he's been some sort of genius, but he IS essentially what I expected - "republican lite" is a cute term you like to use, but I think we're just learning what happens when one side tries to work in compromises and everyone is used to ultimatums, so it doesn't work (or appears not to).
Every time I read one of your posts that touches on this, I get the feeling that you're convinced he should be the man everyone talked about in the campaign. We all knew that couldn't happen. Govt doesn't work like that. So anyway, I don't want to sit here and tell you I think you're wrong, so I should probably just shut up and let you keep on.
Democrats bailing on Obama - War against the Catholic Church heats up
- 09/02/2012 04:03:35 AM
1682 Views
This is not a war on Catholics, it is Obama being an idiot again.
- 09/02/2012 04:52:01 AM
709 Views
For someone who used to be a Con Law professor
- 10/02/2012 08:23:34 PM
593 Views
In general, I disagree with that view, but not in this particular case.
- 11/02/2012 02:02:42 AM
824 Views
Also, kudos for linking to a source, and a fairly non-partisan one as well.
- 09/02/2012 01:33:07 PM
790 Views
I am a non-partisan guy, so I only use unbiased sources! 
*NM*
- 09/02/2012 04:02:50 PM
565 Views
*NM*
- 09/02/2012 04:02:50 PM
565 Views
Wanting both parties to be hit by a bus does not make one non-partisan.
- 09/02/2012 10:05:28 PM
656 Views
- 09/02/2012 10:05:28 PM
656 Views
You lost all credibility in the first line of your post.
- 09/02/2012 04:49:23 PM
727 Views
*NM*
You actually think any of us has 'credibility' anymore in regards to neutrality? *NM*
- 09/02/2012 06:46:13 PM
464 Views
It's one thing to have a bias.
- 09/02/2012 07:28:51 PM
766 Views
Wow, talk about making a supernova out of a couple hydrogen atoms.
- 09/02/2012 08:41:44 PM
564 Views
The Catholic Church wants to eliminate the birth control coverage requirement entirely.
- 10/02/2012 12:24:01 AM
865 Views
Sounds like they just do not want Catholics directly financing; great argument for public healthcare
- 10/02/2012 02:27:36 AM
799 Views
I'm somewhat suprised that Obama blundered this badly.
- 10/02/2012 01:40:14 AM
1592 Views
Why? Have you not been paying attention?
- 10/02/2012 02:03:43 AM
2026 Views
- 10/02/2012 02:03:43 AM
2026 Views
If I am not satisfied with Romney then my Plan B is to not vote.
- 10/02/2012 10:58:34 PM
2035 Views
How does that help anything? Except Romneys election chances, of course.
- 11/02/2012 01:08:22 AM
1877 Views
No everynametaken this is not unconsitutional according to the first ammendment
- 11/02/2012 12:14:29 AM
1903 Views
Obama doing this actually impresses me to no end.
- 10/02/2012 02:21:10 AM
2114 Views
He is already preparing to cave.
- 10/02/2012 02:42:32 AM
2106 Views
Why are you even replying to me? What you said has little meaning to what I said.
- 10/02/2012 03:33:27 AM
1882 Views
Aaaaand you can put your hat back on now: Obama has already caved.
- 10/02/2012 04:04:30 PM
2118 Views
Yup, the cave already happened.....you could have set your watch to this! *NM*
- 10/02/2012 05:00:02 PM
1651 Views
Actually, no, I could not; I expected it to take another week or two.
- 11/02/2012 01:27:31 AM
2018 Views
No, you don't have to buy it from insurers. You get it for free, just like everyone else will. *NM*
- 10/02/2012 09:55:53 PM
1771 Views
"The employees can then buy the coverage directly from an insurer."
- 11/02/2012 01:25:52 AM
2089 Views
Then that article is wrong.
- 11/02/2012 01:43:40 AM
2046 Views
Two days ago the White House said it would not back down from requiring school/hospital compliance.
- 11/02/2012 01:57:50 AM
2014 Views
So in summary... the article you posted was wrong.
- 11/02/2012 02:18:00 AM
1578 Views
To soon to tell, but if you think so feel free to demand a correction from them.
- 11/02/2012 03:12:40 AM
813 Views
Losing the exchanges is a pretty big loss
- 11/02/2012 03:30:15 AM
728 Views
So they refuse to cover it for the next two years, then do an about face in 2014.
- 11/02/2012 03:57:53 AM
878 Views
If Aetna does not provide the free contraception as part of the compromise
- 11/02/2012 02:46:14 AM
606 Views
Yeah, I saw that; if Aetna does not do as Obama says by 2014 they lose out on free profits then.
- 11/02/2012 03:13:36 AM
670 Views
So Jehovah Witness employers should not have to pay for blood transfusions?
- 10/02/2012 03:57:47 AM
678 Views
Not if it conflicts with their religious beliefs.
- 10/02/2012 04:20:32 PM
830 Views
Money is not the same as speech!
- 10/02/2012 07:20:56 PM
584 Views
And actions are different from both—until others are expected to pay for ones actions.
- 11/02/2012 12:53:40 AM
823 Views
No it isn't Joel, empirically you are dead wrong
- 10/02/2012 11:24:19 PM
812 Views
I do not see how requiring private entities do it instead of the feds is "least restrictive way."
- 11/02/2012 12:53:22 AM
806 Views
Catholic Charities of Sacramento Inc. v. Superior Court
- 11/02/2012 01:21:46 AM
745 Views
"the Court found that it wasn't a religious organization, it was just a non-profit corporation."
- 11/02/2012 01:36:33 AM
595 Views
One last point
- 10/02/2012 11:35:25 PM
907 Views
The federal government forcing private groups to facilitate without committing sin also infringes.
- 11/02/2012 01:03:30 AM
684 Views
You argument does not make sense
- 11/02/2012 01:26:57 AM
572 Views
It was an analogy, not an equivalency.
- 11/02/2012 01:48:14 AM
693 Views
Lets enhance your analogy making it closer to reality
- 11/02/2012 02:19:41 AM
784 Views
Why could I not buy it with my own money?
- 11/02/2012 03:46:33 AM
756 Views
Re: Why could I not buy it with my own money?
- 11/02/2012 04:17:17 AM
1998 Views
In other words, I could.
- 11/02/2012 04:21:05 AM
494 Views
You believe it can't help people since it is not single payer? *NM*
- 11/02/2012 04:31:13 AM
474 Views
Since you answered this in your other response I will just adress it there. *MN*
- 11/02/2012 05:59:37 AM
771 Views
Some more points
- 11/02/2012 02:30:27 AM
832 Views
Sex is not a necessity either.
- 11/02/2012 03:56:51 AM
753 Views
LMAO due to Obama's compromise (the word compromise should have a in it )
- 11/02/2012 12:12:57 AM
796 Views
in it )
- 11/02/2012 12:12:57 AM
796 Views
Obama just got two weeks of being portrayed as "anti-church" to the point even Dems complained.
- 11/02/2012 02:00:28 AM
724 Views
The polls disagree with you.
- 11/02/2012 02:32:59 AM
681 Views
It is an interesting article, but not for the polls.
- 11/02/2012 04:18:17 AM
728 Views
I wouldn't put too much into that poll anyway
- 11/02/2012 05:37:05 AM
857 Views
Frankly, I hope Obamacare DOES die, just not because of the public mandate.
- 11/02/2012 07:18:04 AM
734 Views
I haven't really heard about it outside of this post, so the negative exposure can't be too bad.
- 11/02/2012 05:56:58 PM
562 Views
There seems to be plenty of Hell raising over it, but you are in the States and I am not.
- 11/02/2012 07:55:51 PM
587 Views
I don't think it's quite the laughing matter you think it is
- 11/02/2012 12:31:23 PM
734 Views
Understood.
- 11/02/2012 07:51:14 PM
717 Views
mmm...
- 11/02/2012 08:20:26 PM
745 Views
The man talked about during the campaign was the one elected with a mandate.
- 12/02/2012 02:28:15 AM
892 Views
I think Obama (for once) was far more clever you give him credit for...
- 15/02/2012 05:11:10 PM
946 Views
Surrendering on liberal issues then blaming Republicans is not just Obamas strategy, but his POLICY.
- 15/02/2012 07:23:04 PM
795 Views