Active Users:1175 Time:23/11/2024 04:47:18 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
9-0 decision -- where were you? moondog Send a noteboard - 03/02/2012 06:53:56 AM
on the one hand, they don't want themselves filmed in public because they think they're entitled to privacy when they are doing their job ...IN PUBLIC.

but yet they are willing to place a GPS tracker on your car without a warrant because they think your personal driveway is a public place and therefore fair game thank goodness the supreme court knocked that one back down, maybe they can get around to the filming issue this year too...

I remembered hearing about it (and the article does reference it,) but not a final SCOTUS verdict. These days I just take it for granted that the SCOTUS will side with the government in all cases unless they were brought by a member of the GOP. Thank God for small blessings, I suppose.
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
Upcoming Chicago G8 Summit Focuses Attention on Illinois First Amendment Infringement Joel - 03/02/2012 12:20:25 AM 955 Views
police officiers have nothing to fear fromvideo taping? Sorry Joel but that is pure crap Ray - 03/02/2012 01:01:51 AM 530 Views
There's a simple solution to this A Deathwatch Guard - 03/02/2012 02:38:05 AM 476 Views
Yeah, funny how well THAT worked. Joel - 03/02/2012 02:59:17 AM 519 Views
would you take a job where your ever move was captured on tape? Ray - 03/02/2012 02:59:46 AM 561 Views
I have had two, that I recall off the top of my head; SOME of us are NOT too good for some jobs. Joel - 03/02/2012 03:11:29 AM 433 Views
yes so we would end up with people like you as cops, thanks for making my point Ray - 03/02/2012 04:09:54 AM 402 Views
So if your point is invalid the problem is me; glad to see you are being objective here. Joel - 03/02/2012 04:23:03 AM 370 Views
If there were mobs of anger idiots looking set up situation where you could be defaimed Ray - 03/02/2012 04:50:36 AM 455 Views
If it makes you feel better, Rod Blagojevich agrees context ALWAYS exonerates ANYTHING. Joel - 03/02/2012 07:24:55 AM 615 Views
I really have no idea what you are going on about in this rant random thoughts - 03/02/2012 05:31:40 PM 580 Views
You got it in one. Joel - 03/02/2012 07:22:10 PM 530 Views
I'm not asking them to wear them when they go home for the day A Deathwatch Guard - 03/02/2012 05:20:42 AM 494 Views
that is just Big Brother for thee but not for me random thoughts - 03/02/2012 05:45:02 PM 567 Views
This started from the banning of video taping things happening in public A Deathwatch Guard - 03/02/2012 08:22:22 PM 505 Views
There are lots of jobs like that Praziquantel - 03/02/2012 06:19:21 AM 521 Views
and how many of those cameras are controlled by activist looking to smear them? random thoughts - 03/02/2012 05:35:32 PM 593 Views
Isn't this already the case with many police officers / departments? Macharius - 03/02/2012 01:02:25 PM 434 Views
Yes and no; in many cases they can and do turn off the cameras when it suits them. Joel - 03/02/2012 02:33:32 PM 577 Views
As joel pointed those cameras have off switches random thoughts - 03/02/2012 06:02:51 PM 555 Views
I have a job that does that. *NM* Palatine - 03/02/2012 04:37:44 PM 185 Views
a lot of jobs monitor and area but very an individual to wear a camera *NM* random thoughts - 03/02/2012 05:47:59 PM 187 Views
Movie projectionists do. *NM* Ghavrel - 04/02/2012 12:20:21 AM 134 Views
Write a sentence that can be understood and maybe I'll reply with something relevant. *NM* Palatine - 04/02/2012 04:57:27 PM 155 Views
i can't tell if you're making a point or just stupid.... moondog - 03/02/2012 02:42:11 AM 467 Views
luck for my job isn't so hard. Judging you as stupid is an easy call Ray - 03/02/2012 03:46:12 AM 521 Views
No one FORCED the officer in that episode to do ANYTHING. Joel - 03/02/2012 04:57:20 AM 382 Views
The pepper spraying? That is the best you can do? Joel - 03/02/2012 02:54:43 AM 698 Views
OK I see the problem and it is rampant ignorance Ray - 03/02/2012 04:33:47 AM 543 Views
I think we could find a middle ground Urza - 03/02/2012 06:06:32 AM 427 Views
I can sign on for all of that. Joel - 03/02/2012 06:57:54 AM 542 Views
I agree there should be some middle ground random thoughts - 03/02/2012 05:26:33 PM 475 Views
Um, HELLO, it is a felony for journalists to tape police in IL, too. Joel - 03/02/2012 07:16:15 PM 514 Views
That is definitely the problem, though casting aspersions on everyone you can think of hurts, too. Joel - 03/02/2012 06:55:30 AM 650 Views
unfortunately most cops seem to want a double standard moondog - 03/02/2012 02:39:01 AM 451 Views
Ah; I did not realize the SCOTUS had overturned that. Joel - 03/02/2012 03:05:12 AM 403 Views
9-0 decision -- where were you? moondog - 03/02/2012 06:53:56 AM 517 Views
Um, Norway? Joel - 03/02/2012 07:08:11 AM 473 Views
Well, public or private, one does not leave one's right to privacy at the door Isaac - 03/02/2012 05:19:12 PM 434 Views
That is an unnervingly good point. Joel - 03/02/2012 07:13:48 PM 480 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes