Funny how the same people who want to defend personal liberty seem to believe it is OK to lose it if you are a police officer. If we are going to have accountability let’s not do some half ass measure with accountability for some let’s put cameras in every work place, let’s let your boss pull up what is on your monitor at any time. Hell let’s just put cameras in every house that will stop the bad behavior I read a book like that it seemed very effective at controlling behavior.
Anyone who works in a store, hospital, university, etc., is liable to have their activity recorded while at work.
And it's hardly "every move" - no is going to record them going to the bathroom or doing paper work in their office. Only where their interactions are with the people they serve and protect.... or should I say enslave and oppress?
Upcoming Chicago G8 Summit Focuses Attention on Illinois First Amendment Infringement
- 03/02/2012 12:20:25 AM
1025 Views
police officiers have nothing to fear fromvideo taping? Sorry Joel but that is pure crap
- 03/02/2012 01:01:51 AM
607 Views
There's a simple solution to this
- 03/02/2012 02:38:05 AM
553 Views
would you take a job where your ever move was captured on tape?
- 03/02/2012 02:59:46 AM
642 Views
I have had two, that I recall off the top of my head; SOME of us are NOT too good for some jobs. 
- 03/02/2012 03:11:29 AM
508 Views
- 03/02/2012 03:11:29 AM
508 Views
yes so we would end up with people like you as cops, thanks for making my point
- 03/02/2012 04:09:54 AM
483 Views
So if your point is invalid the problem is me; glad to see you are being objective here.
- 03/02/2012 04:23:03 AM
445 Views
- 03/02/2012 04:23:03 AM
445 Views
If there were mobs of anger idiots looking set up situation where you could be defaimed
- 03/02/2012 04:50:36 AM
532 Views
If it makes you feel better, Rod Blagojevich agrees context ALWAYS exonerates ANYTHING.
- 03/02/2012 07:24:55 AM
692 Views
I'm not asking them to wear them when they go home for the day
- 03/02/2012 05:20:42 AM
565 Views
that is just Big Brother for thee but not for me
- 03/02/2012 05:45:02 PM
626 Views
This started from the banning of video taping things happening in public
- 03/02/2012 08:22:22 PM
581 Views
There are lots of jobs like that
- 03/02/2012 06:19:21 AM
594 Views
and how many of those cameras are controlled by activist looking to smear them?
- 03/02/2012 05:35:32 PM
674 Views
Isn't this already the case with many police officers / departments?
- 03/02/2012 01:02:25 PM
502 Views
Yes and no; in many cases they can and do turn off the cameras when it suits them.
- 03/02/2012 02:33:32 PM
655 Views
I have a job that does that. *NM*
- 03/02/2012 04:37:44 PM
207 Views
a lot of jobs monitor and area but very an individual to wear a camera *NM*
- 03/02/2012 05:47:59 PM
210 Views
Write a sentence that can be understood and maybe I'll reply with something relevant. *NM*
- 04/02/2012 04:57:27 PM
177 Views
i can't tell if you're making a point or just stupid....
- 03/02/2012 02:42:11 AM
533 Views
luck for my job isn't so hard. Judging you as stupid is an easy call
- 03/02/2012 03:46:12 AM
594 Views
The pepper spraying? That is the best you can do?
- 03/02/2012 02:54:43 AM
780 Views
OK I see the problem and it is rampant ignorance
- 03/02/2012 04:33:47 AM
617 Views
I think we could find a middle ground
- 03/02/2012 06:06:32 AM
500 Views
I agree there should be some middle ground
- 03/02/2012 05:26:33 PM
539 Views
Um, HELLO, it is a felony for journalists to tape police in IL, too.
- 03/02/2012 07:16:15 PM
557 Views
That is definitely the problem, though casting aspersions on everyone you can think of hurts, too.
- 03/02/2012 06:55:30 AM
722 Views
unfortunately most cops seem to want a double standard
- 03/02/2012 02:39:01 AM
525 Views
Ah; I did not realize the SCOTUS had overturned that.
- 03/02/2012 03:05:12 AM
473 Views
Well, public or private, one does not leave one's right to privacy at the door
- 03/02/2012 05:19:12 PM
512 Views