Active Users:356 Time:19/04/2025 06:02:49 PM
So if your point is invalid the problem is me; glad to see you are being objective here. Joel Send a noteboard - 03/02/2012 04:23:03 AM
I didn’t say we wouldn’t get anyone IO just questioned the quality of what we get.

Yeah, there is a lot of that questioning going around these days, hence the cameras.

The public seems more than a little too eager to abuse the right to filming police officers. If you get caught posting edited footage to give a false impression what happens to you? Hell most people are so convinced the cop was wrong they will continue to believe it even after it is proven the cop followed procedures. I might agree with the idea that cops are video tapped officially and the footage looked at if there are complaints but they should be hostage to any dickweed with a phone that takes video and public who is willing to make judgments based on what said dickweed posted on youtube.

If someone posts footage falsely representing events to defame officers or a police force that seems like grounds for a libel suit. If someone makes it the basis of action against the police we get into areas like filing a false report or perhaps even perjury (yea, I got convicted of a felony; that showed those pigs! )

Bottom line is still that anything done on a public street is public, not private. Again, people get arrested daily for that reason. Why do cops merit a lower standard?
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Upcoming Chicago G8 Summit Focuses Attention on Illinois First Amendment Infringement - 03/02/2012 12:20:25 AM 1025 Views
police officiers have nothing to fear fromvideo taping? Sorry Joel but that is pure crap - 03/02/2012 01:01:51 AM 607 Views
There's a simple solution to this - 03/02/2012 02:38:05 AM 552 Views
Yeah, funny how well THAT worked. - 03/02/2012 02:59:17 AM 591 Views
would you take a job where your ever move was captured on tape? - 03/02/2012 02:59:46 AM 642 Views
I have had two, that I recall off the top of my head; SOME of us are NOT too good for some jobs. - 03/02/2012 03:11:29 AM 508 Views
yes so we would end up with people like you as cops, thanks for making my point - 03/02/2012 04:09:54 AM 483 Views
So if your point is invalid the problem is me; glad to see you are being objective here. - 03/02/2012 04:23:03 AM 445 Views
If there were mobs of anger idiots looking set up situation where you could be defaimed - 03/02/2012 04:50:36 AM 532 Views
If it makes you feel better, Rod Blagojevich agrees context ALWAYS exonerates ANYTHING. - 03/02/2012 07:24:55 AM 692 Views
I really have no idea what you are going on about in this rant - 03/02/2012 05:31:40 PM 640 Views
You got it in one. - 03/02/2012 07:22:10 PM 598 Views
I'm not asking them to wear them when they go home for the day - 03/02/2012 05:20:42 AM 564 Views
that is just Big Brother for thee but not for me - 03/02/2012 05:45:02 PM 626 Views
This started from the banning of video taping things happening in public - 03/02/2012 08:22:22 PM 581 Views
There are lots of jobs like that - 03/02/2012 06:19:21 AM 593 Views
and how many of those cameras are controlled by activist looking to smear them? - 03/02/2012 05:35:32 PM 674 Views
Isn't this already the case with many police officers / departments? - 03/02/2012 01:02:25 PM 502 Views
As joel pointed those cameras have off switches - 03/02/2012 06:02:51 PM 625 Views
I have a job that does that. *NM* - 03/02/2012 04:37:44 PM 207 Views
a lot of jobs monitor and area but very an individual to wear a camera *NM* - 03/02/2012 05:47:59 PM 210 Views
Movie projectionists do. *NM* - 04/02/2012 12:20:21 AM 163 Views
i can't tell if you're making a point or just stupid.... - 03/02/2012 02:42:11 AM 533 Views
The pepper spraying? That is the best you can do? - 03/02/2012 02:54:43 AM 780 Views
OK I see the problem and it is rampant ignorance - 03/02/2012 04:33:47 AM 617 Views
I think we could find a middle ground - 03/02/2012 06:06:32 AM 500 Views
I can sign on for all of that. - 03/02/2012 06:57:54 AM 608 Views
I agree there should be some middle ground - 03/02/2012 05:26:33 PM 539 Views
unfortunately most cops seem to want a double standard - 03/02/2012 02:39:01 AM 525 Views
Ah; I did not realize the SCOTUS had overturned that. - 03/02/2012 03:05:12 AM 473 Views
9-0 decision -- where were you? - 03/02/2012 06:53:56 AM 580 Views
Um, Norway? - 03/02/2012 07:08:11 AM 547 Views
Well, public or private, one does not leave one's right to privacy at the door - 03/02/2012 05:19:12 PM 512 Views
That is an unnervingly good point. - 03/02/2012 07:13:48 PM 551 Views

Reply to Message