Active Users:1119 Time:23/11/2024 05:02:02 AM
I have had two, that I recall off the top of my head; SOME of us are NOT too good for some jobs. Joel Send a noteboard - 03/02/2012 03:11:29 AM
Sorry, I could not resist when you set me up that perfectly.
Funny how the same people who want to defend personal liberty seem to believe it is OK to lose it if you are a police officer. If we are going to have accountability let’s not do some half ass measure with accountability for some let’s put cameras in every work place, let’s let your boss pull up what is on your monitor at any time. Hell let’s just put cameras in every house that will stop the bad behavior I read a book like that it seemed very effective at controlling behavior.

IN PUBLIC, we are talking about taping them doing their jobs IN PUBLIC. Not inside a building at a private workplace (though, again, there are certainly plenty of jobs that do that) or inside someones home, but on the street. People have the right not be searched on the street, but if even their BEHAVIOR on the street is private... well, police violate the Fourth Amendment thousands of times a day when they arrest people for drunk driving, solicitation, narcotics trafficking or even PUBLIC intoxication.

EDIT: Make it three; Eckerds used cameras, too.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 03/02/2012 at 03:16:30 AM
Reply to message
Upcoming Chicago G8 Summit Focuses Attention on Illinois First Amendment Infringement - 03/02/2012 12:20:25 AM 955 Views
police officiers have nothing to fear fromvideo taping? Sorry Joel but that is pure crap - 03/02/2012 01:01:51 AM 530 Views
There's a simple solution to this - 03/02/2012 02:38:05 AM 476 Views
Yeah, funny how well THAT worked. - 03/02/2012 02:59:17 AM 519 Views
would you take a job where your ever move was captured on tape? - 03/02/2012 02:59:46 AM 561 Views
I have had two, that I recall off the top of my head; SOME of us are NOT too good for some jobs. - 03/02/2012 03:11:29 AM 435 Views
I'm not asking them to wear them when they go home for the day - 03/02/2012 05:20:42 AM 494 Views
that is just Big Brother for thee but not for me - 03/02/2012 05:45:02 PM 567 Views
This started from the banning of video taping things happening in public - 03/02/2012 08:22:22 PM 506 Views
There are lots of jobs like that - 03/02/2012 06:19:21 AM 521 Views
and how many of those cameras are controlled by activist looking to smear them? - 03/02/2012 05:35:32 PM 593 Views
Isn't this already the case with many police officers / departments? - 03/02/2012 01:02:25 PM 434 Views
As joel pointed those cameras have off switches - 03/02/2012 06:02:51 PM 555 Views
I have a job that does that. *NM* - 03/02/2012 04:37:44 PM 185 Views
a lot of jobs monitor and area but very an individual to wear a camera *NM* - 03/02/2012 05:47:59 PM 187 Views
Movie projectionists do. *NM* - 04/02/2012 12:20:21 AM 134 Views
i can't tell if you're making a point or just stupid.... - 03/02/2012 02:42:11 AM 467 Views
The pepper spraying? That is the best you can do? - 03/02/2012 02:54:43 AM 698 Views
OK I see the problem and it is rampant ignorance - 03/02/2012 04:33:47 AM 543 Views
I think we could find a middle ground - 03/02/2012 06:06:32 AM 427 Views
I can sign on for all of that. - 03/02/2012 06:57:54 AM 542 Views
I agree there should be some middle ground - 03/02/2012 05:26:33 PM 475 Views
unfortunately most cops seem to want a double standard - 03/02/2012 02:39:01 AM 451 Views
Ah; I did not realize the SCOTUS had overturned that. - 03/02/2012 03:05:12 AM 403 Views
9-0 decision -- where were you? - 03/02/2012 06:53:56 AM 517 Views
Um, Norway? - 03/02/2012 07:08:11 AM 473 Views
Well, public or private, one does not leave one's right to privacy at the door - 03/02/2012 05:19:12 PM 434 Views
That is an unnervingly good point. - 03/02/2012 07:13:48 PM 480 Views

Reply to Message