Active Users:1208 Time:22/11/2024 01:40:58 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I'm not so sure I agree. Or not completely. nossy Send a noteboard - 02/02/2012 06:14:11 PM
If people really want to be offended though they should be offended by the fact that we spend twice the much money on breast cancer research as we do on prostate cancer even though close to the same number of people die from both. But that is another debate of course.

All true.

Like it or not we outspend on breast cancer because the campaign to support it has been so successful. Fear of breast cancer is an issue that unites women no matter their race, religion or politics. Sending money to an organization best known for doing abortions poisons that well.

And that they sue other charities who attempt to use the words "for the cure" or the color pink, but that's neither here nor there.

It only "poisons the well" for the people who look at it that way. At this point, there are probably just as many (if not more) women who feel that a clinic that provides low-cost cancer screenings (etc) is an important investment.

It doesn’t really matter how the money is spent, there a lot of women out there who would rather burn their money than let it go to Planned Parenthood. Take my aunt for example, my uncle runs an oil company and all she does is spend money and do charity work. If it is a cause she believes in or one that she believes is sheik, she would have no problem dropping a grand to enter a bike race supporting it. Not only that but she can call twenty or so of her dearest friends and they will show up as well. Let them think that even a penny of that money is being spent on abortions and they will shun your event and tell all their friends to do the same and my aunt will be happy spending her money on $100 flip-flops and organic facial cream. She is very health conscious and has great insurance, she will get her screening either way.

That is also true; however, just as your aunt exists and chooses her charities, there are others who do the same for the PP side. I mean, $400,000 was raised immediately after the news came out. They can't have everyone, but when politics plays a bigger role than finding a cure, we're getting skewed.

If they were raising money for women's productive health then it would be foolish to not give money to PP but since that isn't their goal it was foolish to let their happy fell feel good movement that everyone from the NFL to Target supports be dragged into one of the most divisive issues in the country. If Komen isn't staying up nights trying to find a way to gracefully break the link with PP and all of its political baggage she should be fired for incompetence. Her job is to raise money and to stay the hell away from political causes that will hurt that goal.

Not really. Their job is to raise money to help women gain awareness and to monitor the state of their health (breast cancer screenings and referrals for mammograms) and use that money wisely to try to find a cure. If too many concessions are made for politics, they're failing. I also read that they have ceased funding for stem cell research, which is also political and against what they expressly claim to be for.
Reply to message
Susan G. Komen cuts funds to Planned Parenthood. (with updated edit) nossy - 02/02/2012 04:32:27 PM 2193 Views
The most annoying part is in the sixth paragraph- abortions are only a small part of their thing beetnemesis - 02/02/2012 05:08:07 PM 1084 Views
I agree. nossy - 02/02/2012 05:20:17 PM 996 Views
I can understand it though. Sareitha Sedai - 02/02/2012 05:45:55 PM 1055 Views
I can too, it just isn't for me. nossy - 02/02/2012 05:58:33 PM 966 Views
Actually, there are longer-acting forms of birth control than the pill. Dreaded Anomaly - 03/02/2012 12:37:42 AM 980 Views
I do think that preventing abortions is their primary goal. Sareitha Sedai - 03/02/2012 01:08:05 AM 942 Views
If they don't see that link, it's because they haven't looked. Dreaded Anomaly - 03/02/2012 02:42:42 AM 1027 Views
That is a little unfair. Joel - 03/02/2012 12:48:46 PM 1237 Views
Won't someone please think of the children?! Dreaded Anomaly - 04/02/2012 05:03:27 AM 1025 Views
I think you're leaving out some important points. nossy - 04/02/2012 03:40:48 PM 968 Views
Ah, the good ol' silent majority. Dreaded Anomaly - 04/02/2012 07:32:29 PM 942 Views
So which moron is feeding you this crap? Ray - 04/02/2012 10:27:15 PM 966 Views
A zygote isn't a person, because it doesn't have a brain. Dreaded Anomaly - 05/02/2012 12:33:29 AM 961 Views
It worries me when we think alike.... Joel - 05/02/2012 01:22:35 PM 1001 Views
Brain waves at 8 weeks are a myth. Dreaded Anomaly - 05/02/2012 08:46:06 PM 1104 Views
"brain function... appears to be reliably present in the fetus at about eight weeks' gestation." Joel - 05/02/2012 10:42:35 PM 1016 Views
Oh please. Dreaded Anomaly - 05/02/2012 11:13:50 PM 980 Views
Re: Oh please yourself. Joel - 06/02/2012 09:15:26 PM 857 Views
Quite a telling reply. Dreaded Anomaly - 07/02/2012 04:38:20 AM 923 Views
Re: I quite agree. Joel - 08/02/2012 06:03:23 PM 1127 Views
You're taking an issue of objective facts and treating it like a day of playground gossip. Dreaded Anomaly - 09/02/2012 03:47:06 AM 967 Views
No, your source, in which there is very little that is objective, did that for me. Joel - 11/02/2012 02:59:45 AM 990 Views
I see you have continued to provide no factual arguments. Dreaded Anomaly - 14/02/2012 04:53:28 AM 1226 Views
I presented factual rebuttals. Joel - 19/02/2012 01:56:45 AM 1018 Views
You continue to miss the point. Dreaded Anomaly - 23/02/2012 10:22:24 PM 1108 Views
No, I got the point: You expect me to accept a heavily biased, partisan and combative "source." Joel - 07/03/2012 01:47:37 AM 1027 Views
The claim of brain waves at 8 weeks is still unsupported by evidence, i.e. a myth. Dreaded Anomaly - 15/03/2012 09:16:14 PM 1065 Views
Well, yes. nossy - 04/02/2012 11:14:47 PM 1028 Views
A silent majority may as well not exist, if it has no tangible effects. Dreaded Anomaly - 05/02/2012 12:54:34 AM 973 Views
You ignoring it is not the same thing as it having no tangible effect. nossy - 05/02/2012 02:11:36 AM 1066 Views
Ignoring what? You haven't shown me anything solid. Dreaded Anomaly - 05/02/2012 05:25:23 AM 966 Views
It's ok, we're done. *NM* nossy - 05/02/2012 09:29:05 AM 589 Views
Since few people oppose ADULT contraception access, that might be wise in this case. Joel - 04/02/2012 08:25:49 PM 1055 Views
Re: Since few people oppose ADULT contraception access, that might be wise in this case. Dreaded Anomaly - 05/02/2012 02:11:28 AM 967 Views
If you are arguing most sex ed opponents are naïve/ignorant, I agree. Joel - 05/02/2012 08:42:17 AM 799 Views
Re: If you are arguing most sex ed opponents are naïve/ignorant, I agree. Dreaded Anomaly - 05/02/2012 10:04:59 PM 967 Views
Re: If you are arguing most sex ed opponents are naïve/ignorant, I agree. Joel - 06/02/2012 08:57:38 PM 948 Views
I'm done discussing my use of the term "oppression." The Tim Ryan stuff is interesting, though. Dreaded Anomaly - 07/02/2012 05:37:05 AM 1045 Views
Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it. Joel - 08/02/2012 06:01:32 PM 1136 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it. Dreaded Anomaly - 09/02/2012 05:30:58 AM 1003 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it. Joel - 11/02/2012 02:58:00 AM 1033 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it. Dreaded Anomaly - 14/02/2012 04:29:08 AM 1096 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it. Joel - 19/02/2012 01:54:30 AM 1012 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it. Dreaded Anomaly - 23/02/2012 10:59:32 PM 1311 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it. Joel - 07/03/2012 01:47:44 AM 966 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it. Dreaded Anomaly - 15/03/2012 10:27:23 PM 1225 Views
There are problems with the implants LadyLorraine - 03/02/2012 01:42:55 AM 991 Views
Any form of birth control doesn't work for everyone, though. Dreaded Anomaly - 03/02/2012 02:37:00 AM 1009 Views
Oh yes, I totally agree! My point is just that there are some barriers to handing out implants *NM* LadyLorraine - 03/02/2012 03:38:05 AM 468 Views
You have a talent for understatement. Joel - 03/02/2012 01:08:40 PM 976 Views
What on earth does that have to do with anything? Cannoli - 03/02/2012 01:47:42 AM 924 Views
I was actually kinda with you until you closed with that anathema I condemned in my response to rt. Joel - 03/02/2012 01:39:06 PM 954 Views
I agree that they have made Beast Cancer a cult but splitting with PP is just smart Ray - 02/02/2012 05:39:49 PM 1126 Views
I agree. Sareitha Sedai - 02/02/2012 06:00:17 PM 908 Views
yes she is going to have to piss off one group or the other Ray - 02/02/2012 06:12:31 PM 976 Views
Right nossy - 02/02/2012 06:24:14 PM 1026 Views
it is a judgment call and I hope her decision is based on more than my guesses Ray - 02/02/2012 06:53:50 PM 896 Views
Do you see a way Komen could have avoided pissing off one side? Sareitha Sedai - 02/02/2012 06:55:36 PM 973 Views
No, I don't. I don't believe I said that? nossy - 02/02/2012 07:53:50 PM 881 Views
You didn't; I inferred it from the way you phrased that ("if she HAS to..."). Sorry. Sareitha Sedai - 02/02/2012 08:06:11 PM 964 Views
I know I'm not always clear. nossy - 02/02/2012 08:32:47 PM 966 Views
Just curious... Narg - 02/02/2012 10:07:49 PM 949 Views
Not at all. nossy - 02/02/2012 10:24:19 PM 1012 Views
Not at all? Narg - 02/02/2012 10:32:31 PM 903 Views
No. nossy - 02/02/2012 10:47:04 PM 866 Views
My argument is based on my belief that the pro-choice women are more dedicated to women's causes Ray - 02/02/2012 11:17:24 PM 956 Views
Re: My argument is based on my belief that the pro-choice women are more dedicated to women's causes nossy - 03/02/2012 12:08:01 AM 955 Views
wow that may be the worst advice I had in weeks Ray - 03/02/2012 12:13:18 AM 918 Views
Ooor, the best. nossy - 03/02/2012 12:25:56 AM 900 Views
ok now you are just being mean *NM* Ray - 03/02/2012 12:46:12 AM 588 Views
The thread was going too well - I thought we needed the meanness. *NM* nossy - 03/02/2012 11:30:39 AM 534 Views
rabble rouser *NM* Ray - 04/02/2012 04:24:01 AM 551 Views
I misread this at first Sareitha Sedai - 03/02/2012 12:51:44 AM 959 Views
not to mention codeine seems to make me double post Ray - 02/02/2012 11:17:26 PM 2002 Views
I'm not so sure I agree. Or not completely. nossy - 02/02/2012 06:14:11 PM 892 Views
I don't diagree with the way you see it Ray - 02/02/2012 06:39:41 PM 964 Views
More inevitable than anything, considering who started Komen. Joel - 02/02/2012 10:19:34 PM 909 Views
Never having heard of any of those except PP, my opinion may not be the most relevant... Legolas - 02/02/2012 08:32:48 PM 1033 Views
You don't know stuff. nossy - 02/02/2012 08:43:38 PM 996 Views
I know the stuff that matters. Legolas - 02/02/2012 09:55:08 PM 897 Views
That's true. nossy - 02/02/2012 10:34:32 PM 987 Views
they may also be a afraid that PP will go the way of ACORN Ray - 02/02/2012 11:04:16 PM 1040 Views
"Accused" of = unfounded slander. Aeryn - 03/02/2012 12:13:30 AM 1051 Views
did you notice I called tactic disgusting? That doesn't mean it isn't effective Ray - 03/02/2012 12:45:10 AM 982 Views
The investigation by Congress is well-known to be specious. It's the House GOP abusing their power. *NM* Dreaded Anomaly - 03/02/2012 12:41:58 AM 644 Views
This is so foreign a debate for me Lews_TherinThelamon - 02/02/2012 10:16:15 PM 1015 Views
Must be nice. *NM* nossy - 03/02/2012 12:26:49 AM 640 Views
Re: stuff rebelaessedai - 03/02/2012 09:18:53 AM 914 Views
I'm sorry, but what're we talking about when we're talking about "cancer" LadyLorraine - 03/02/2012 12:49:34 PM 946 Views
Obviously not adenocarcinoma, no. rebelaessedai - 04/02/2012 07:36:06 AM 959 Views
I"m not that fussed. I'm just generally leary of research that has results like that LadyLorraine - 04/02/2012 08:35:04 PM 904 Views
Fair enough. rebelaessedai - 04/02/2012 10:17:31 PM 974 Views
Once I looked up Nancy Brinker at Wikipedia it all made sense. Joel - 02/02/2012 10:54:34 PM 996 Views
Re: Once I looked up Nancy Brinker at Wikipedia it all made sense. nossy - 02/02/2012 11:03:32 PM 920 Views
After a little more digging I have to say you are probably right. Joel - 03/02/2012 02:23:14 AM 857 Views
They restored funding incidentally Isaac - 03/02/2012 05:43:47 PM 893 Views
Unless I've missed it nossy - 03/02/2012 05:56:15 PM 981 Views
You must have missed it then Isaac - 03/02/2012 07:07:13 PM 895 Views
If you're referring to Cannoli nossy - 03/02/2012 07:19:25 PM 1048 Views
Multiple was not an accidental choice of words Isaac - 03/02/2012 11:46:30 PM 923 Views
Then I agree that maybe this is not the thread for you. nossy - 04/02/2012 12:41:42 AM 957 Views
Re: Then I agree that maybe this is not the thread for you. Isaac - 04/02/2012 01:53:25 AM 1149 Views
Well, I'll try again for both of us. nossy - 04/02/2012 02:56:42 PM 979 Views
Re: Well, I'll try again for both of us. Isaac - 04/02/2012 07:40:25 PM 946 Views
well at least there will not be any doubt about this being a political decision random thoughts - 03/02/2012 06:24:14 PM 1093 Views
Re: well at least there will not be any doubt about this being a political decision Isaac - 03/02/2012 06:29:34 PM 866 Views
I think that ship sailed long ago. Joel - 03/02/2012 08:45:13 PM 898 Views
Truth Dannymac - 04/02/2012 02:07:20 AM 1003 Views
I do wonder a bit which lawmakers Fox thinks "pressured" Komen. Joel - 03/02/2012 08:29:50 PM 894 Views
Beyond the 26 senators, I'd imagine rumor of the more reliable sort Isaac - 03/02/2012 08:46:31 PM 963 Views
Well, if they wrote AS senators rather than friends of Nancy Brinker, that probably qualifies. Joel - 03/02/2012 10:24:11 PM 1009 Views
Judge for yourself Isaac - 04/02/2012 12:01:06 AM 1020 Views
Well, a public letter makes whether they signed it "Sen. so-and-so" irrelevant: It is political. Joel - 04/02/2012 04:07:20 PM 948 Views
are you trying to disprove the study you posted? random thoughts - 03/02/2012 09:20:12 PM 1022 Views
To me, it depends on the nature of the contact, which I have not dug enough to discover. Joel - 03/02/2012 10:43:45 PM 924 Views
you admit you have no incite into what happened Ray - 04/02/2012 04:27:17 AM 948 Views
Actually, it looks like Komens new VP (and former GOP GA gubernatorial candidate) had the incite. Joel - 04/02/2012 04:24:14 PM 996 Views
educated guess don't work when you are tinfoil hat wearing kool-aid drinker Ray - 04/02/2012 09:33:49 PM 894 Views
Dude. nossy - 04/02/2012 11:20:49 PM 836 Views
Yo mama? Joel - 05/02/2012 05:32:11 AM 990 Views
whhhhhhyyyyyy nossy - 04/02/2012 11:23:58 PM 965 Views
Why would I not think that? Joel - 05/02/2012 05:46:15 AM 865 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes