Active Users:1182 Time:22/11/2024 06:51:44 PM
Welcome to the 99%, Dom Larry Send a noteboard - 21/01/2012 08:52:41 AM
I give up. You cllearly don't understand the scope and purpose of these bills. I'll leave you to your delusions.





While I have a few reservations about possible ulterior motives of those who protested the loudest, I do think the now-moribund bills are questionable at best in how copyright protections are tackled. Sadly, I'm not surprised by any of this...even Joel's failure to understand that espionage is covered under already-existing laws :P
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Reply to message
English Wikipedia Anti-SOPA Blackout - 17/01/2012 08:31:46 AM 2103 Views
Yeah, man, because currently copyright holders have no recourse, am I right? - 17/01/2012 11:47:35 AM 937 Views
"altering the infrastructure of the Internet so as to render RAFO virtually inaccessible"? - 17/01/2012 08:12:27 PM 1040 Views
I'll go ahead and ask before I get my panties in a bunch: do you understand these bills? - 17/01/2012 09:09:22 PM 1132 Views
I admit I have not looked into it much - 17/01/2012 11:42:30 PM 986 Views
And yet you're still arguing the matter. - 18/01/2012 02:34:04 AM 1091 Views
I love you. *NM* - 18/01/2012 03:41:03 AM 632 Views
heh, thanks. I usually find myself pushing minority opinions. Nice to be "appreciated" for once. *NM* - 18/01/2012 04:01:10 AM 619 Views
Can i second the adulation? - 18/01/2012 04:07:17 AM 822 Views
I too (three?) appreciate the common sense and reasonable explanations. *NM* - 18/01/2012 04:12:59 AM 617 Views
Thanks guys. - 18/01/2012 04:39:00 AM 983 Views
Right, because the argument is not just over THIS bill but, apparently, over ANY bill. - 18/01/2012 11:09:13 AM 988 Views
Alternatives to SOPA/PIPA have been proposed for months now. Please stop arguing this. - 18/01/2012 05:42:10 PM 942 Views
That is really all I ask. - 18/01/2012 06:26:37 PM 976 Views
"sensitive federal content"? Provide a source justifying this claim and it's relevance, please. - 18/01/2012 05:59:47 PM 1006 Views
I would not have thought a source necessary. - 18/01/2012 06:24:44 PM 1001 Views
Okay, I'm with Aemon now. - 18/01/2012 07:36:21 PM 1015 Views
OK. - 18/01/2012 10:16:16 PM 1037 Views
Surreal. It's like you're a spam-bot or something. *NM* - 19/01/2012 01:23:35 AM 750 Views
That was constructive. - 19/01/2012 03:29:53 PM 913 Views
Very nicely summarised. *NM* - 18/01/2012 02:06:02 AM 553 Views
should be interesting - 17/01/2012 12:41:47 PM 860 Views
Could be; depends on a lot of factors. - 17/01/2012 07:38:55 PM 929 Views
See, that's one of the biggest problems that people aren't understanding. - 17/01/2012 09:31:38 PM 946 Views
So tell them that. - 17/01/2012 11:54:19 PM 1091 Views
Could've done without the snide rejoinder, but, good. - 17/01/2012 02:20:08 PM 866 Views
I love the black banner, like some kind of internet Holocaust. - 17/01/2012 08:03:27 PM 1005 Views
Are you aware that SOPA/PIPA has nothing to do with hackers and everything to do with copyright? - 18/01/2012 02:08:56 AM 846 Views
There seems to be some overlap. - 18/01/2012 01:08:22 PM 969 Views
Re: There seems to be some overlap. - 18/01/2012 08:13:15 PM 840 Views
Re: There still seems to be some overlap. - 18/01/2012 10:27:32 PM 1105 Views
Re: There still seems to be some overlap. - 18/01/2012 11:30:39 PM 960 Views
Just because the news does not mention something does not automatically make it non-applicable. - 19/01/2012 04:08:58 PM 973 Views
Re: Just because the news does not mention something does not automatically make it non-applicable. - 19/01/2012 10:39:40 PM 959 Views
If you re-read your last sentence it should be clear why this law is being pushed. - 20/01/2012 09:12:29 PM 1241 Views
Re: If you re-read your last sentence it should be clear why this law is being pushed. - 21/01/2012 03:19:49 AM 867 Views
Welcome to the 99%, Dom - 21/01/2012 08:52:41 AM 939 Views
They taste good with sprinkles. - 21/01/2012 10:00:35 AM 946 Views
Er, what Ghav said. - 18/01/2012 02:30:37 AM 870 Views
Sorry, protecting Pirate Bay and offshore gambling are not compelling counterarguments. - 18/01/2012 11:38:08 AM 912 Views
Okay, another analogy: - 18/01/2012 02:04:12 PM 897 Views
A technical examination of SOPA and PROTECT IP - 18/01/2012 08:32:44 AM 876 Views
"As a disclaimer, I am not a lawyer, I'm a sysadmin." - 18/01/2012 12:47:16 PM 1136 Views
wow, you are totally correct! - 18/01/2012 03:45:54 PM 904 Views
That is a separate issue. - 18/01/2012 04:01:24 PM 905 Views
Thank you for posting that. - 18/01/2012 03:09:07 PM 924 Views
Wikipedia has already convinced me - 18/01/2012 03:26:01 PM 756 Views
Trying to stop this legislation without proposing an alternative is trying to stop ANY legislation. - 18/01/2012 03:44:18 PM 981 Views
It isn't their job to propose legislation - 18/01/2012 04:12:53 PM 901 Views
No, but they have as much RIGHT to do so as anyone else. - 18/01/2012 05:31:55 PM 879 Views
Strike three. - 18/01/2012 05:37:55 PM 938 Views
That is fine; that is what people SHOULD be doing. - 18/01/2012 06:03:59 PM 754 Views
Things being better now than they would be under SOPA seems like a legitimate argument to me - 18/01/2012 09:04:18 PM 1017 Views
Against SOPA, sure; against ANY new law, no. - 18/01/2012 10:46:48 PM 861 Views
Re: Against SOPA, sure; against ANY new law, no. - 19/01/2012 12:15:48 AM 933 Views
That is a poor approach to drafting legislation, at best. - 19/01/2012 04:37:22 PM 973 Views
About "proposing new legislation" - 18/01/2012 04:45:08 PM 1017 Views
So true - 18/01/2012 05:08:45 PM 954 Views
Not to go off on a tangent about combatting piracy... - 18/01/2012 05:38:12 PM 855 Views
Entirely agree *NM* - 18/01/2012 06:13:13 PM 607 Views
That was an excellent post. *NM* - 19/01/2012 11:18:19 PM 585 Views
Re: About "proposing new legislation" - 18/01/2012 05:59:55 PM 1092 Views
For those who want a short, one page explanation... - 18/01/2012 05:41:49 PM 884 Views
Yeah, so I use Russian wikipedia for a day. Or German wikipedia, or French, or Italian... *NM* - 18/01/2012 06:23:36 PM 670 Views
We get it: You are a polyglot. - 18/01/2012 06:27:48 PM 875 Views
Or just hit stop right before the script runs. *NM* - 18/01/2012 06:52:40 PM 654 Views
Or just disable Java. *NM* - 19/01/2012 01:58:03 AM 516 Views
That's not as much fun though. *NM* - 19/01/2012 02:13:44 AM 644 Views
Exactly, this way its kind of a game. *NM* - 19/01/2012 02:20:37 AM 458 Views
Or Answers.com, or even the actual sources that are often copy/pasted into Wikipedia... - 19/01/2012 01:07:38 AM 1003 Views
They all did it on twitter - 19/01/2012 01:26:19 AM 938 Views
I was asleep much of the day - 19/01/2012 02:40:11 AM 995 Views
Oh, no; now Congress will be inundated with complaints from lazy college students! - 19/01/2012 04:40:12 PM 1025 Views
13 previously unopposed senators now do not support SOPA. - 19/01/2012 11:36:15 PM 987 Views
How does that "rebutt" what was a facetious post in the first place? - 20/01/2012 09:24:27 PM 1087 Views
a joke can, indeed, be rebutted... - 21/01/2012 09:07:32 PM 974 Views
Oh, draggie, I ALWAYS see what you do there. - 21/01/2012 10:01:58 PM 931 Views

Reply to Message