My point was, from a business standpoint, there's a point of diminishing returns when it comes to fighting piracy, and it's not too deep.
So, spend half a billion lobbying Congress for a draconian bill that won't really affect piracy anyway, or focus your money and energy on figuring out a way to make money in a new world.
Even taking SOPA out of it, the point still stands- movie ticket sales have dropped, Netflix is making a killing. Music pirating did and does exist, but iTunes is still the number one music-buying platform. I don't know the numbers for television, but I DO know that viewing shows on the Internet and through DVR has become so prevalent that the numbers are becoming just as relevant as actual live viewing.
So, spend half a billion lobbying Congress for a draconian bill that won't really affect piracy anyway, or focus your money and energy on figuring out a way to make money in a new world.
Even taking SOPA out of it, the point still stands- movie ticket sales have dropped, Netflix is making a killing. Music pirating did and does exist, but iTunes is still the number one music-buying platform. I don't know the numbers for television, but I DO know that viewing shows on the Internet and through DVR has become so prevalent that the numbers are becoming just as relevant as actual live viewing.
I amuse myself.
English Wikipedia Anti-SOPA Blackout
17/01/2012 08:31:46 AM
- 2102 Views
Yeah, man, because currently copyright holders have no recourse, am I right?
17/01/2012 11:47:35 AM
- 936 Views
"altering the infrastructure of the Internet so as to render RAFO virtually inaccessible"?
17/01/2012 08:12:27 PM
- 1039 Views
I'll go ahead and ask before I get my panties in a bunch: do you understand these bills?
17/01/2012 09:09:22 PM
- 1131 Views
I admit I have not looked into it much
17/01/2012 11:42:30 PM
- 986 Views
And yet you're still arguing the matter.
18/01/2012 02:34:04 AM
- 1090 Views
I love you. *NM*
18/01/2012 03:41:03 AM
- 632 Views
heh, thanks. I usually find myself pushing minority opinions. Nice to be "appreciated" for once. *NM*
18/01/2012 04:01:10 AM
- 619 Views
Can i second the adulation?
18/01/2012 04:07:17 AM
- 822 Views
I too (three?) appreciate the common sense and reasonable explanations. *NM*
18/01/2012 04:12:59 AM
- 617 Views
Right, because the argument is not just over THIS bill but, apparently, over ANY bill.
18/01/2012 11:09:13 AM
- 988 Views
Alternatives to SOPA/PIPA have been proposed for months now. Please stop arguing this.
18/01/2012 05:42:10 PM
- 941 Views
Also, in the case of the OPEN Act, it has not "been proposed for months."
18/01/2012 07:28:15 PM
- 1407 Views
"sensitive federal content"? Provide a source justifying this claim and it's relevance, please.
18/01/2012 05:59:47 PM
- 1006 Views
I would not have thought a source necessary.
18/01/2012 06:24:44 PM
- 1001 Views
Okay, I'm with Aemon now.
18/01/2012 07:36:21 PM
- 1014 Views
OK.
18/01/2012 10:16:16 PM
- 1037 Views
should be interesting
17/01/2012 12:41:47 PM
- 860 Views
Could be; depends on a lot of factors.
17/01/2012 07:38:55 PM
- 928 Views
See, that's one of the biggest problems that people aren't understanding.
17/01/2012 09:31:38 PM
- 946 Views
So tell them that.
17/01/2012 11:54:19 PM
- 1090 Views
Joel, I think I'm done with this unless you want to do some research.
18/01/2012 02:53:19 AM
- 893 Views
Research would tell me what is wrong with these bills and how a good bill should look.
18/01/2012 11:22:46 AM
- 1010 Views
Could've done without the snide rejoinder, but, good.
17/01/2012 02:20:08 PM
- 865 Views
I love the black banner, like some kind of internet Holocaust.
17/01/2012 08:03:27 PM
- 1004 Views
Are you aware that SOPA/PIPA has nothing to do with hackers and everything to do with copyright?
18/01/2012 02:08:56 AM
- 846 Views
There seems to be some overlap.
18/01/2012 01:08:22 PM
- 969 Views
Re: There seems to be some overlap.
18/01/2012 08:13:15 PM
- 840 Views
Re: There still seems to be some overlap.
18/01/2012 10:27:32 PM
- 1105 Views
Re: There still seems to be some overlap.
18/01/2012 11:30:39 PM
- 960 Views
Just because the news does not mention something does not automatically make it non-applicable.
19/01/2012 04:08:58 PM
- 973 Views
Re: Just because the news does not mention something does not automatically make it non-applicable.
19/01/2012 10:39:40 PM
- 959 Views
If you re-read your last sentence it should be clear why this law is being pushed.
20/01/2012 09:12:29 PM
- 1241 Views
Re: If you re-read your last sentence it should be clear why this law is being pushed.
21/01/2012 03:19:49 AM
- 867 Views
Er, what Ghav said.
18/01/2012 02:30:37 AM
- 870 Views
Sorry, protecting Pirate Bay and offshore gambling are not compelling counterarguments.
18/01/2012 11:38:08 AM
- 912 Views
Okay, another analogy:
18/01/2012 02:04:12 PM
- 897 Views
The devil is always in the details, and it seems clear the details need great revision.
18/01/2012 03:31:20 PM
- 902 Views
what they SHOULD do is stop taking money from proponents of sopa/pipa
18/01/2012 03:51:09 PM
- 1016 Views
Yes, they should, but, once again, that approach will not prevent a new law.
18/01/2012 04:05:02 PM
- 990 Views
Re: The devil is always in the details, and it seems clear the details need great revision.
18/01/2012 04:27:30 PM
- 941 Views
If the US government wants to summarily block sites within the US, it already can and will.
18/01/2012 06:15:53 PM
- 892 Views
You know all this anti-SOPA bullshit is making me hope the bill passes.
18/01/2012 04:00:17 AM
- 957 Views
I would not go THAT far; it seems clear these bills have many objectionable provisions.
18/01/2012 11:41:23 AM
- 982 Views
Re: I would not go THAT far; it seems clear these bills have many objectionable provisions.
19/01/2012 01:57:46 AM
- 805 Views
Yeah, the extreme bias on both sides is why the bills will likely pass more or less as written.
19/01/2012 03:31:52 PM
- 989 Views
joel, you need to consider three things
18/01/2012 06:06:16 AM
- 950 Views
You need to consider that they WILL pass some legislation, and what you want it to contain.
18/01/2012 12:15:38 PM
- 999 Views
again, it's not about piracy, it's about protecting the mpaa/riaa business model at our expense
18/01/2012 03:34:32 PM
- 1073 Views
Yeah, see, that is the problem: "it's not about piracy."
18/01/2012 03:57:55 PM
- 911 Views
if piracy is such a problem then the mpaa/riaa need to PROVE their losses
19/01/2012 02:43:31 AM
- 931 Views
How do you expect anyone to prove what people WOULD HAVE bought if they could not just take it?
19/01/2012 03:57:24 PM
- 1215 Views
A technical examination of SOPA and PROTECT IP
18/01/2012 08:32:44 AM
- 876 Views
"As a disclaimer, I am not a lawyer, I'm a sysadmin."
18/01/2012 12:47:16 PM
- 1135 Views
Wikipedia has already convinced me
18/01/2012 03:26:01 PM
- 756 Views
Trying to stop this legislation without proposing an alternative is trying to stop ANY legislation.
18/01/2012 03:44:18 PM
- 981 Views
It isn't their job to propose legislation
18/01/2012 04:12:53 PM
- 901 Views
No, but they have as much RIGHT to do so as anyone else.
18/01/2012 05:31:55 PM
- 879 Views
Strike three.
18/01/2012 05:37:55 PM
- 938 Views
That is fine; that is what people SHOULD be doing.
18/01/2012 06:03:59 PM
- 754 Views
Things being better now than they would be under SOPA seems like a legitimate argument to me
18/01/2012 09:04:18 PM
- 1017 Views
Against SOPA, sure; against ANY new law, no.
18/01/2012 10:46:48 PM
- 860 Views
About "proposing new legislation"
18/01/2012 04:45:08 PM
- 1015 Views
So true
18/01/2012 05:08:45 PM
- 954 Views
Re: About "proposing new legislation"
18/01/2012 05:59:55 PM
- 1092 Views
Hm, you should read my post one above about combatting online piracy.
18/01/2012 06:20:16 PM
- 1045 Views
I would not recommend photocopying a book and handing it out on street corners.
18/01/2012 06:45:52 PM
- 964 Views
Not to blame, neccessarily. But you have to live in the real world.
18/01/2012 07:31:18 PM
- 885 Views
Re: Not to blame, neccessarily. But you have to live in the real world.
18/01/2012 08:55:59 PM
- 974 Views
I always liked the codewheels SSI provided with copies of their Gold Box AD&D games.
18/01/2012 10:07:40 PM
- 1096 Views
These are really different arguments
19/01/2012 12:05:10 AM
- 867 Views
TV is slightly different, because regional availability becomes a factor.
19/01/2012 04:18:58 PM
- 859 Views
Yeah, so I use Russian wikipedia for a day. Or German wikipedia, or French, or Italian... *NM*
18/01/2012 06:23:36 PM
- 670 Views
Or just hit stop right before the script runs. *NM*
18/01/2012 06:52:40 PM
- 654 Views
Or just disable Java. *NM*
19/01/2012 01:58:03 AM
- 516 Views
That's not as much fun though. *NM*
19/01/2012 02:13:44 AM
- 644 Views
Exactly, this way its kind of a game. *NM*
19/01/2012 02:20:37 AM
- 458 Views
I really don't see the fun in that. Wikipedia is just a tool, not a game. *NM*
19/01/2012 04:59:14 AM
- 561 Views
I don't know about those (except French), but none of the ones I ever used are remotely as good. *NM*
18/01/2012 08:13:47 PM
- 645 Views
Russian wikipedia is very good if you're not checking some obscure Western cultural phenomena.
19/01/2012 01:57:43 AM
- 1040 Views
Or Answers.com, or even the actual sources that are often copy/pasted into Wikipedia...
19/01/2012 01:07:38 AM
- 1003 Views
Re: Or Answers.com, or even the actual sources that are often copy/pasted into Wikipedia... *NM*
19/01/2012 01:34:46 AM
- 691 Views
Oh, no; now Congress will be inundated with complaints from lazy college students!
19/01/2012 04:40:12 PM
- 1025 Views
13 previously unopposed senators now do not support SOPA.
19/01/2012 11:36:15 PM
- 987 Views
How does that "rebutt" what was a facetious post in the first place?
20/01/2012 09:24:27 PM
- 1087 Views