Active Users:1186 Time:22/11/2024 06:50:26 PM
joel, you need to consider three things moondog Send a noteboard - 18/01/2012 06:06:16 AM
1. sopa/pipa is going to change copyright infringement from what is currently a civil infraction, punishable by a maximum penalty of $150k (US) for the worst infringements into a felony with a jail term of 5 years. plus, they are changing the definition of what is meant by infringement to include sites which offer streaming services such as youtube, hulu, etc. this is not sustainable and impractical to properly police.

2. if the DNS provisions pass (which thankfully it looks like they won't -- yet), the internet as we know it will cease to exist and be replaced by the internet as brought to you by rupert murdoch, the mpaa/riaa, and the current US attorney general. if one of the groups involved in writing this bill gets their way, you won't be able to go to websites they don't want you to see, end of story. the attorney general has the power to pull the DNS for any website he/she deems to be infringing. how long before this power extends to websites he/she does not want the public to see? tell me you think the government will restrain itself with such power at its disposal?

3. the DNS provisions will essentially do the same thing as malware that redirects your search results to malicious websites. only this time, the redirection is controlled by the federal government by the attorney general's command. this is almost exactly bringing the "great firewall of china" to the US. and all because hollywood is trying to pretend they're missing out on all this money. money which they have never statistically proven they are actually missing out on, and money which for some reason hasn't stopped them from posting substantial profits every year. ask yourself why the US government is protecting the business model of this industry, and what purpose the government has for propping up the industry in such a way.

the whole thing is beyond "hackers/pirates versus law abiding citizens". the whole thing is literally going to destroy the internet as we currently know it and put the absolute control of how the internet works into the attorney general's hands forever. you really need to read up on (a) the contents of sopa/pipa and (b) how DNS works, specifically how DNS "poisoning" works. then come back and re-read your replies in this thread and see how wrong you are.
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
English Wikipedia Anti-SOPA Blackout - 17/01/2012 08:31:46 AM 2103 Views
Yeah, man, because currently copyright holders have no recourse, am I right? - 17/01/2012 11:47:35 AM 937 Views
"altering the infrastructure of the Internet so as to render RAFO virtually inaccessible"? - 17/01/2012 08:12:27 PM 1040 Views
I'll go ahead and ask before I get my panties in a bunch: do you understand these bills? - 17/01/2012 09:09:22 PM 1132 Views
I admit I have not looked into it much - 17/01/2012 11:42:30 PM 986 Views
And yet you're still arguing the matter. - 18/01/2012 02:34:04 AM 1091 Views
I love you. *NM* - 18/01/2012 03:41:03 AM 632 Views
heh, thanks. I usually find myself pushing minority opinions. Nice to be "appreciated" for once. *NM* - 18/01/2012 04:01:10 AM 619 Views
Can i second the adulation? - 18/01/2012 04:07:17 AM 822 Views
I too (three?) appreciate the common sense and reasonable explanations. *NM* - 18/01/2012 04:12:59 AM 617 Views
Thanks guys. - 18/01/2012 04:39:00 AM 983 Views
Right, because the argument is not just over THIS bill but, apparently, over ANY bill. - 18/01/2012 11:09:13 AM 988 Views
Alternatives to SOPA/PIPA have been proposed for months now. Please stop arguing this. - 18/01/2012 05:42:10 PM 942 Views
That is really all I ask. - 18/01/2012 06:26:37 PM 976 Views
"sensitive federal content"? Provide a source justifying this claim and it's relevance, please. - 18/01/2012 05:59:47 PM 1006 Views
I would not have thought a source necessary. - 18/01/2012 06:24:44 PM 1001 Views
Okay, I'm with Aemon now. - 18/01/2012 07:36:21 PM 1014 Views
OK. - 18/01/2012 10:16:16 PM 1037 Views
Surreal. It's like you're a spam-bot or something. *NM* - 19/01/2012 01:23:35 AM 750 Views
That was constructive. - 19/01/2012 03:29:53 PM 913 Views
Very nicely summarised. *NM* - 18/01/2012 02:06:02 AM 553 Views
should be interesting - 17/01/2012 12:41:47 PM 860 Views
Could be; depends on a lot of factors. - 17/01/2012 07:38:55 PM 929 Views
See, that's one of the biggest problems that people aren't understanding. - 17/01/2012 09:31:38 PM 946 Views
So tell them that. - 17/01/2012 11:54:19 PM 1091 Views
Could've done without the snide rejoinder, but, good. - 17/01/2012 02:20:08 PM 866 Views
I love the black banner, like some kind of internet Holocaust. - 17/01/2012 08:03:27 PM 1005 Views
Are you aware that SOPA/PIPA has nothing to do with hackers and everything to do with copyright? - 18/01/2012 02:08:56 AM 846 Views
There seems to be some overlap. - 18/01/2012 01:08:22 PM 969 Views
Re: There seems to be some overlap. - 18/01/2012 08:13:15 PM 840 Views
Er, what Ghav said. - 18/01/2012 02:30:37 AM 870 Views
Sorry, protecting Pirate Bay and offshore gambling are not compelling counterarguments. - 18/01/2012 11:38:08 AM 912 Views
Okay, another analogy: - 18/01/2012 02:04:12 PM 897 Views
joel, you need to consider three things - 18/01/2012 06:06:16 AM 952 Views
A technical examination of SOPA and PROTECT IP - 18/01/2012 08:32:44 AM 876 Views
"As a disclaimer, I am not a lawyer, I'm a sysadmin." - 18/01/2012 12:47:16 PM 1136 Views
wow, you are totally correct! - 18/01/2012 03:45:54 PM 904 Views
That is a separate issue. - 18/01/2012 04:01:24 PM 905 Views
Thank you for posting that. - 18/01/2012 03:09:07 PM 923 Views
Wikipedia has already convinced me - 18/01/2012 03:26:01 PM 756 Views
Trying to stop this legislation without proposing an alternative is trying to stop ANY legislation. - 18/01/2012 03:44:18 PM 981 Views
It isn't their job to propose legislation - 18/01/2012 04:12:53 PM 901 Views
No, but they have as much RIGHT to do so as anyone else. - 18/01/2012 05:31:55 PM 879 Views
Strike three. - 18/01/2012 05:37:55 PM 938 Views
That is fine; that is what people SHOULD be doing. - 18/01/2012 06:03:59 PM 754 Views
Things being better now than they would be under SOPA seems like a legitimate argument to me - 18/01/2012 09:04:18 PM 1017 Views
Against SOPA, sure; against ANY new law, no. - 18/01/2012 10:46:48 PM 861 Views
Re: Against SOPA, sure; against ANY new law, no. - 19/01/2012 12:15:48 AM 933 Views
That is a poor approach to drafting legislation, at best. - 19/01/2012 04:37:22 PM 973 Views
About "proposing new legislation" - 18/01/2012 04:45:08 PM 1017 Views
So true - 18/01/2012 05:08:45 PM 954 Views
Not to go off on a tangent about combatting piracy... - 18/01/2012 05:38:12 PM 855 Views
Entirely agree *NM* - 18/01/2012 06:13:13 PM 607 Views
That was an excellent post. *NM* - 19/01/2012 11:18:19 PM 585 Views
Re: About "proposing new legislation" - 18/01/2012 05:59:55 PM 1092 Views
For those who want a short, one page explanation... - 18/01/2012 05:41:49 PM 884 Views
Yeah, so I use Russian wikipedia for a day. Or German wikipedia, or French, or Italian... *NM* - 18/01/2012 06:23:36 PM 670 Views
We get it: You are a polyglot. - 18/01/2012 06:27:48 PM 875 Views
Or just hit stop right before the script runs. *NM* - 18/01/2012 06:52:40 PM 654 Views
Or just disable Java. *NM* - 19/01/2012 01:58:03 AM 516 Views
That's not as much fun though. *NM* - 19/01/2012 02:13:44 AM 644 Views
Exactly, this way its kind of a game. *NM* - 19/01/2012 02:20:37 AM 458 Views
Or Answers.com, or even the actual sources that are often copy/pasted into Wikipedia... - 19/01/2012 01:07:38 AM 1003 Views
They all did it on twitter - 19/01/2012 01:26:19 AM 938 Views
I was asleep much of the day - 19/01/2012 02:40:11 AM 995 Views
Oh, no; now Congress will be inundated with complaints from lazy college students! - 19/01/2012 04:40:12 PM 1025 Views
13 previously unopposed senators now do not support SOPA. - 19/01/2012 11:36:15 PM 987 Views
How does that "rebutt" what was a facetious post in the first place? - 20/01/2012 09:24:27 PM 1087 Views
a joke can, indeed, be rebutted... - 21/01/2012 09:07:32 PM 974 Views
Oh, draggie, I ALWAYS see what you do there. - 21/01/2012 10:01:58 PM 931 Views

Reply to Message