I hate how he's constantly billed as the libertarian candidate given his extreme views on social issues. Oh yeah, except for the weed. Big deal- you absolutely cannot be pro liberty if you seek to limit the rights of half the human race. (And that's even before you delve into his issues with people that are not white, not straight, etc). Basically, he could only be a white man's idea of a libertarian.
You do not have to be a woman to be offended when women's rights are threatened. Women are human beings first so women's rights are human rights. Absolutely everyone should be offended by Ron Paul.
Some will say- oh he just wants to leave it to the states!
1. No he does not. He is favor of a personhood amendment.
2. Even if it was true that he would want to leave it to the states, that would also be wrong. Personal liberty cannot be optional. States absolutely should not be able to choose to, say, let private businesses choose not to serve customers that are not of a certain race.
You do not have to be a woman to be offended when women's rights are threatened. Women are human beings first so women's rights are human rights. Absolutely everyone should be offended by Ron Paul.
Some will say- oh he just wants to leave it to the states!
1. No he does not. He is favor of a personhood amendment.
2. Even if it was true that he would want to leave it to the states, that would also be wrong. Personal liberty cannot be optional. States absolutely should not be able to choose to, say, let private businesses choose not to serve customers that are not of a certain race.
None of the others stand a chance against Obama in the general election.
That number is pretty meaningless. If nearly 60% of republicans find Ron Paul acceptable, then he could be the nominee. Right now he's tied with Romney and Santorum for the lead. Paul's platform has more support than the media would like you to believe. A lot of people are sick of meaningless wars and having the US try (and fail) to solve all of the world's problems while our own continue unchecked. As a college student myself, cutting student loans would have no impact on my support for him. With the tax money I'd save if he could make even a fraction of the cuts he's mentioned, I wouldn't need loans anyway. Really, based on the issues, Ron Paul is the only candidate I want to see as president.
Unfortunately, you're right; it probably won't happen. Instead, Obama will be getting a second term.
I recently saw a survey where over 40% of republicans find him unacceptable, that was twice the number of any other candidate. Sorry but Ron Paul really doesn't have much support outside his loopy base and even most them don't support his platform so much as they support the idea of him. How strong would his support be among college students if he really did cutoff their student loans? I know all the cool kids like him but that won't get you in Oval Office.
That number is pretty meaningless. If nearly 60% of republicans find Ron Paul acceptable, then he could be the nominee. Right now he's tied with Romney and Santorum for the lead. Paul's platform has more support than the media would like you to believe. A lot of people are sick of meaningless wars and having the US try (and fail) to solve all of the world's problems while our own continue unchecked. As a college student myself, cutting student loans would have no impact on my support for him. With the tax money I'd save if he could make even a fraction of the cuts he's mentioned, I wouldn't need loans anyway. Really, based on the issues, Ron Paul is the only candidate I want to see as president.
Unfortunately, you're right; it probably won't happen. Instead, Obama will be getting a second term.
Santorum is #2 in Iowa
- 04/01/2012 01:24:13 PM
1737 Views
would you stop using that word? It is gross. *NM*
- 04/01/2012 01:48:45 PM
566 Views
What's your word for it? *NM*
- 04/01/2012 03:43:44 PM
522 Views
Well, there's nothing wrong with Santoruming in the privacy of one's home.
- 04/01/2012 02:35:56 PM
1054 Views
yeah that it so funny
- 04/01/2012 03:05:59 PM
924 Views
he kind of brought it on himself by being so decidedly anti-gay that it pissed lots of people off
- 04/01/2012 04:36:39 PM
966 Views
maybe the gays brought all the gay bashing on themselves
- 05/01/2012 03:18:15 PM
1161 Views
Civility is a social contract
- 05/01/2012 04:39:46 PM
929 Views
so now that the gays have broken that contract they are fair game?
- 05/01/2012 06:37:52 PM
680 Views
Re: so now that the gays have broken that contract they are fair game?
- 06/01/2012 05:29:49 PM
938 Views
So is it OK if just insult the gays who are politically active and push their agenda?
- 06/01/2012 06:16:30 PM
967 Views
If you call them out by name for hypocrisy, then sure.
- 10/01/2012 05:22:34 PM
989 Views
yes but once you have thrown out all civil decency why start getting nuanced?
- 11/01/2012 09:09:13 PM
906 Views
Actually, your response was expected
- 04/01/2012 10:08:33 PM
1020 Views
do you still pretend that it isn't political?
- 05/01/2012 03:14:25 PM
856 Views
I'm sorry
- 05/01/2012 03:52:57 PM
961 Views
funny how it always woks out that way
- 05/01/2012 06:44:55 PM
766 Views
Believe what you will, but my wok skills are poor 
- 05/01/2012 07:32:17 PM
926 Views
- 05/01/2012 07:32:17 PM
926 Views
You should ask one of the gays to help you. I hear the gays are good at cooking. *NM*
- 06/01/2012 01:54:21 AM
611 Views
Santorum is a man who believes you must compare homosexual love to bestiality and pedophilia
- 05/01/2012 04:42:26 AM
933 Views
and Savage is a Man who believes that vulgar personal attacks
- 05/01/2012 03:12:42 PM
1080 Views
Why should a person tolerate intolerance? (Serious question.) *NM*
- 05/01/2012 08:46:05 PM
642 Views
The question boils down to why should someone tolerate what they think is wrong.
- 05/01/2012 10:53:40 PM
898 Views
and when santorum tells you that your lifestyle is worse than pedophilia and bestiality?
- 06/01/2012 03:34:52 AM
852 Views
To be fair...
- 06/01/2012 05:32:31 AM
995 Views
You are correct
- 06/01/2012 01:21:18 PM
1049 Views
Then it seems like it's a problem of definitions more than anything else.
- 06/01/2012 09:48:49 PM
957 Views
Following the logic to its bitter end. Why do I do this to myself???
- 06/01/2012 10:14:01 PM
1017 Views
Following the logic to its bitter end. Why do I do this to myself???
- 06/01/2012 10:14:01 PM
1017 Views
Those are really not equivalent.
- 06/01/2012 04:18:37 PM
812 Views
Re: Those are really not equivalent.
- 06/01/2012 10:27:11 PM
943 Views
I don't like your definition of tolerance and you're not consistent with it anyway.
- 07/01/2012 01:49:05 AM
979 Views
In case you were curious, I really disagree with your understanding of tolerance. *NM*
- 09/01/2012 08:24:45 PM
597 Views
I find myself agreeing with you recently
So at this point, most of the candidates had a moment at the top. Kind of awesome.
- 05/01/2012 11:22:50 PM
920 Views
that is why Perry is staying in the race
- 06/01/2012 06:20:54 PM
890 Views
He should stay, they should all stay. Trump should get back into it and Palin should jump in too.
- 06/01/2012 07:00:52 PM
830 Views
It would be the joke of the year if Huntsman got a turn.
- 06/01/2012 10:59:36 PM
843 Views
Is he a bigger long shot than Santorum, though? Gingrich? Bachman? CAIN!?
- 07/01/2012 01:34:47 AM
944 Views
Yes, for the reason you state.
- 07/01/2012 03:04:39 PM
903 Views
I really do not agree.
- 09/01/2012 08:51:46 PM
931 Views
Like I said, check Obamas numbers any time in the last year and a half.
- 10/01/2012 11:41:47 AM
813 Views
More like everyone has had a moment running second to Romney.
- 07/01/2012 01:59:25 PM
827 Views
It's not a foregone conclusion yet.
- 07/01/2012 04:03:51 PM
941 Views
It kinda is; Paul cannot even win a majority of Republicans, let alone the country.
- 07/01/2012 09:09:07 PM
916 Views
Ironically, Paul has a better chance of winning the general election than the republican primary.
- 07/01/2012 10:14:07 PM
1003 Views
What's the likelihood of Paul running as an independent/3rd party if he doesn't get the GOP nod? *NM*
- 07/01/2012 10:21:23 PM
343 Views
Not very high, I think. He didn't try it last time either, and it would hand Obama the election. *NM*
- 08/01/2012 01:29:01 AM
462 Views
many states have laws that you cannot run 3rd party after being on the ballot for a party primary
- 08/01/2012 06:12:36 AM
1039 Views
Yes, he and Romney have that in common, but Pauls positions are (mostly) sincere.
- 10/01/2012 03:46:04 PM
1016 Views
give up the hope it is nothing more than a pipe dream
- 09/01/2012 02:57:03 PM
948 Views
All of the republican candidates are pipe dreams.
- 09/01/2012 08:56:57 PM
751 Views
I find Ron Paul absolutely infuriating.
- 09/01/2012 10:44:09 PM
1018 Views
Um...
- 10/01/2012 03:54:53 PM
849 Views
Paul is an equal opportunity infuriator, to borrow Vivien's word.
- 09/01/2012 10:56:57 PM
913 Views
The original santorum 2003 interview for those who want to know
- 07/01/2012 05:32:00 AM
1127 Views
And here is the 2002 op ed where he blamed liberalism causing the Catholic Church sex abuse scandal
- 07/01/2012 05:36:39 AM
941 Views