Active Users:1096 Time:22/11/2024 08:02:43 AM
Re: he is a good pitcher just not worth the money callandor1000 Send a noteboard - 13/12/2011 02:27:36 AM
Hell I am not even sure Pujols is worth the kind of money they are paying him at least in the long term. It make winning our division again much tougher. I hope we can pick up someone good to replace CJ. A true ace pitcher is what we are really lacking. I wonder if Lee misses us yet.


Wilson had a few OK seasons recently but nothing crazy. I think he's a 3-4 guy, really. I think Texas made a huge mistake not keeping Lee. They should have spent big on him. In the long run he was a guy who may have been worth it.

Pujols isn't worth the money year in and year out, but on a whole, I think he will be. The first 5 years will be great, he'll make them a ton of money and help them win a lot of games. After that, he'll probably have 2 more years mixed where he approaches that kind of worth. In the end, I think it'll all balance out.

Your mom. That's right. The cat is out of the bag. Your mom.

My mind isn't always in the gutter, it just has VIP access
Reply to message
Albert Pujols has signed with the Angels!!! - 08/12/2011 03:53:58 PM 634 Views
- 08/12/2011 04:13:56 PM 469 Views
I thought of you when I saw that. - 08/12/2011 04:39:04 PM 493 Views
Not as big of a blow to the Cardinals as it would seem at first glance. - 08/12/2011 05:18:09 PM 603 Views
Re: Not as big of a blow to the Cardinals as it would seem at first glance. - 09/12/2011 03:04:57 AM 530 Views
True. - 09/12/2011 02:29:31 PM 533 Views
Re: True. - 12/12/2011 10:04:32 PM 489 Views
and they got CJ as well - 08/12/2011 05:45:11 PM 527 Views
Yeah, they make a great move and sign Pujols then screw up with Wilson. - 09/12/2011 03:03:27 AM 503 Views
he is a good pitcher just not worth the money - 09/12/2011 04:15:57 PM 525 Views
Re: he is a good pitcher just not worth the money - 13/12/2011 02:27:36 AM 586 Views
I'm happy for you and yours. Congrats. *NM* - 08/12/2011 11:48:31 PM 214 Views
BOOOO! - 09/12/2011 08:47:45 PM 1079 Views

Reply to Message