You're not getting every little detail of our lives. You're getting little GATHERING reports.
Rebekah Send a noteboard - 23/10/2011 04:10:00 PM
There's a fine line to walk on Twitter between being too bland and corporate (just keeping it to books and authors) and being too personal. If you're too much the former you won't pick up new followers because people don't like to see sites just pushing their own posts. And I would argue - on the basis of seeing what a lot of bloggers and other sites post - that we are nowhere near the too-personal end of things.
We're using Twitter as one way of bringing in new members, and it has in fact brought a lot more traffic to the site. Whether that's turned into new members is harder to say.
And, for your information, since making those tweets we've picked up five more followers.
Frankly, I'm tired of people whining about things when we try new ways to get more traffic and life into the site. Most people keep their negativity to themselves. We don't expect everyone to enjoy the Twitter function, but how about you stop whining every time there's something in it that doesn't appeal to you? The point about disabling the Tweet box has been made before.
We're using Twitter as one way of bringing in new members, and it has in fact brought a lot more traffic to the site. Whether that's turned into new members is harder to say.
And, for your information, since making those tweets we've picked up five more followers.
Frankly, I'm tired of people whining about things when we try new ways to get more traffic and life into the site. Most people keep their negativity to themselves. We don't expect everyone to enjoy the Twitter function, but how about you stop whining every time there's something in it that doesn't appeal to you? The point about disabling the Tweet box has been made before.
*MySmiley*
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
I love you guys, but I'm phenomenally uninterested in the status of your bartabs.
22/10/2011 01:12:00 PM
- 855 Views
So, there are occasions of other subjects in which you are interested in the tweet box? *NM*
22/10/2011 02:07:00 PM
- 137 Views
Sanderson tweeting about being nearly done with being nearly done with WoT was good.
22/10/2011 03:11:43 PM
- 363 Views
Not really. But the self-absorbed vapidity of some really aggravates me. *NM*
22/10/2011 09:00:53 PM
- 154 Views
I don't notice them 85% of the time, so they don't bother me. *NM*
22/10/2011 09:54:38 PM
- 210 Views
I'm interested in their bartabs
*NM*
23/10/2011 02:43:46 AM
- 180 Views

Follow them on Twitter then.
*NM*
23/10/2011 08:37:53 AM
- 146 Views

I already do
23/10/2011 10:03:37 AM
- 375 Views

Web 2.0 is a vapid scam, and Twitter's existence is contrary to a discussion forum. *NM*
23/10/2011 10:23:09 AM
- 146 Views
By participating in this thread you've smeared yourself in Web2.0 jelly and danced a Rumba
23/10/2011 10:26:00 AM
- 391 Views
You kidding? Behind the scenes, yeah, probably, but RAFO's style is like Web 0.5.
*NM*
23/10/2011 10:59:05 AM
- 145 Views

You are such a grump.
23/10/2011 08:21:33 AM
- 369 Views
I'm just not interested in every detail of your lives. NSSP tags and Journals exist for a reason.
23/10/2011 08:39:06 AM
- 444 Views
You're not getting every little detail of our lives. You're getting little GATHERING reports.
23/10/2011 04:10:00 PM
- 394 Views
He's right though.
23/10/2011 09:34:05 AM
- 409 Views
Yes, and that point has been made before.
23/10/2011 04:11:50 PM
- 427 Views
I have seen the question a few times. What I don't recall seeing is an answer.
24/10/2011 01:53:31 PM
- 393 Views
I'd agree if it was twelve tweets or if they started commenting Rugby from the pub via Twitter
23/10/2011 04:29:32 PM
- 432 Views