I don't know what you consider to be "Locke's principles," but I can say with certainty that in his Second Treatise of Civil Government, Locke states that in his opinion governments are formed by people willingly giving up some of their power in order to form an organization that will protect their liberty and property. That automatically negates Communism or other such ideas, due to being violations of those principles.
As for the ideals of a democracy, they are, similarly, to protect personal liberties and rights. The free-market system does not violate that at all, because the whole point of a free-market is that things happen voluntarily. It is Communism that is incompatible with democracy, because under Communism, there are no rights that are respected or enforced, and instead people live under a tyranny.
As for the ideals of a democracy, they are, similarly, to protect personal liberties and rights. The free-market system does not violate that at all, because the whole point of a free-market is that things happen voluntarily. It is Communism that is incompatible with democracy, because under Communism, there are no rights that are respected or enforced, and instead people live under a tyranny.
Is communism the true economy of democracies?
10/10/2011 01:35:24 AM
- 775 Views
Sorry, not following this.....
10/10/2011 03:33:11 AM
- 596 Views
Um, a LOT of places have mixed "free" market and state rule.
10/10/2011 05:43:49 AM
- 617 Views
WTF? Canada, Western Europe, and Japan are democracies, not state-rule like China - *NM*
10/10/2011 05:53:17 PM
- 227 Views
They are not similar.
10/10/2011 04:01:59 AM
- 468 Views
That's why Lenin came up with the soviets, though that was pretty naïve, too.
10/10/2011 05:54:37 AM
- 417 Views
Lenin died in 1924. The Civil War was over in 1920. He died after several strokes. *NM*
10/10/2011 05:30:58 PM
- 197 Views
Sorry, did not realize he survived it that long.
11/10/2011 04:21:05 AM
- 522 Views
There is no evidence that Lenin was poisoned.
11/10/2011 04:50:28 AM
- 450 Views
That is hardly the only way to kill; in Lenins condition, neglect would have sufficed.
11/10/2011 06:28:31 AM
- 481 Views
Let's see...you're asking if property theft by the state is compatible with freedom? No.
10/10/2011 04:58:14 AM
- 461 Views
I'm curious how you distinguish "full socialism" from "full communism."
10/10/2011 05:32:53 AM
- 432 Views
You obviously don't understand the definitions of socialism and communism.
10/10/2011 02:41:39 PM
- 515 Views
In theory, but economics is not politics, making social contracts a bit more dubious.
10/10/2011 05:18:39 AM
- 599 Views
No. A thousand times no.
10/10/2011 07:46:22 AM
- 604 Views
Guess I count myself among those fools, though I pretty much agree with Danny.
10/10/2011 10:52:11 AM
- 509 Views
I don't usually answer your scattershot rants, Joel, but you have overextended yourself.
10/10/2011 05:28:07 PM
- 547 Views
That still looks like Stalin and Mao rationalizing away the impossibility of their stated goals.
11/10/2011 05:59:06 AM
- 562 Views
No time to today, but you're very wrong.
11/10/2011 02:32:38 PM
- 443 Views
OK.
11/10/2011 03:08:17 PM
- 432 Views
In a single word: No.
11/10/2011 08:26:36 AM
- 438 Views
Nope, because free-market democracy totally permits communism already
12/10/2011 12:50:36 AM
- 506 Views