Active Users:1134 Time:23/11/2024 02:26:34 AM
Wikipedia confirms what I already thought: you're off base with the monophysitism. Legolas Send a noteboard - 07/10/2011 12:06:40 AM
Christians COMMONLY accepted most, if not all, of the Nicene Creed long before the Council of Nicaea. The Council was prompted by that commonly accepted beliefs growing erosion and muddling due to deliberate Gnostic and heretic assaults and a widespread vagueness and ignorance among NEW Christians only beginning to rigorously explore Christology. Thus the Church formally stated its Christology, clarifying what was indisputably Spirit breathed (e.g. the Gospel of John) and what was simply heresy (e.g. Monophysite denial of Christs humanity, Ebionite denial of His divinity, and Gnostic Trojan horses like the "Gospels" of Thomas and Judas.) The Councils of Nicaea and Ephesus brought order out of chaos by the Grace of God, but the idea Christianity had until then been an eclectic equivalent of Gnosticism that simply replaced "gnosis" with "Jesus" in not credible.

Monophysitism didn't even exist as a theology at the time of the Council of Nicaea, as far as I can tell from a quick look at the articles - it certainly didn't become a major controversy until the sixth century, two centuries after Nicaea. Nor is there any reason why monophysites should be considered to deviate from the Nicene Creed.

As it happens, that actually strengthens your case, though. The Copts, Ethiopian Christians and a few smaller groups have a theology that apparently is technically "miaphysite", but might as well be monophysite; this doesn't prevent them from adhering to the Nicene Creed.
Reply to message
Mormons - 03/10/2011 05:46:10 AM 2362 Views
Questions. - 03/10/2011 11:13:25 AM 1115 Views
Ooh! Ooh! - 03/10/2011 11:18:38 AM 966 Views
I don't watch it. - 04/10/2011 01:34:53 AM 971 Views
Re: Questions. - 03/10/2011 01:28:28 PM 1078 Views
Re: Questions. - 03/10/2011 01:31:13 PM 903 Views
Why did I look up what Quorn is? I didn't need to know that. *NM* - 03/10/2011 02:04:20 PM 628 Views
Wyld Stallyns!! - 03/10/2011 03:26:54 PM 903 Views
STATION! *NM* - 03/10/2011 11:00:35 PM 553 Views
Re: One of the best replies, ever, on the internet. *NM* - 06/10/2011 02:43:07 AM 601 Views
....did we just get door-to-door'd...ONLINE?!?! *NM* - 03/10/2011 11:34:19 AM 573 Views
Nope. - 04/10/2011 01:32:43 AM 957 Views
there's no real point to it - 04/10/2011 02:37:24 AM 1958 Views
We could use an evil cackling smilie, we do have some other evil ones - 04/10/2011 02:49:12 AM 924 Views
wasn't going to argue... *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:57:00 AM 546 Views
Do you ever giggle at the name "Moroni?" - 03/10/2011 11:39:55 AM 1023 Views
There are Mormon literalists? Seriously? *NM* - 03/10/2011 03:02:18 PM 564 Views
I know they don't have multiple wives anymore, so no misconception there - 03/10/2011 01:23:50 PM 949 Views
There are Fundamentalist "Mormons" who do... - 03/10/2011 11:32:56 PM 881 Views
Don't get me wrong by the way, I've met wonderful Mormons - 04/10/2011 12:22:03 PM 922 Views
Question: Why are you such a faggot? *NM* - 03/10/2011 02:23:45 PM 467 Views
Answer: because it's the only way he could return your burning love for him. - 03/10/2011 03:24:23 PM 694 Views
Oh dont be such a fuddy duddy. - 03/10/2011 10:42:06 PM 584 Views
Better a faggot than a fuckwad. Cheers fuckwad! *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:27:20 AM 588 Views
Well, I suppose you'ld be the one to know. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:54:35 AM 525 Views
Really? You really just pulled a "takes one to know one"? *NM* - 04/10/2011 04:19:22 PM 618 Views
Re: You embarrass yourself. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:56:02 AM 474 Views
I'll tell you whats embarresing... - 04/10/2011 02:08:02 AM 798 Views
That is hilarious. - 04/10/2011 03:10:50 AM 689 Views
Goodness.. - 04/10/2011 03:20:30 AM 632 Views
Re: - 04/10/2011 03:28:25 AM 664 Views
You know, my mother had a saying. - 04/10/2011 03:39:32 AM 697 Views
I think it's safe to say ... - 04/10/2011 04:09:17 AM 598 Views
I'm not sure which would be sadder... - 04/10/2011 11:32:55 AM 735 Views
*NM* - 04/10/2011 12:19:01 PM 562 Views
Re: You flatter me. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:31:01 PM 583 Views
OK, you need to delete the "Re:" You're using it incorrectly - 04/10/2011 01:55:53 PM 609 Views
"Re" doesn't have to mean "reply", it can also mean "regarding". - 04/10/2011 02:01:31 PM 640 Views
Re: Re: - 04/10/2011 02:06:58 PM 638 Views
Re: Re: - 04/10/2011 02:12:57 PM 604 Views
Re: Also. - 04/10/2011 02:08:15 PM 649 Views
you are still using it incorrectly. *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:09:48 PM 596 Views
He's doing it on purpose though. - 04/10/2011 03:31:39 PM 707 Views
Re: Yeah, it's just a shtick... - 04/10/2011 03:47:17 PM 605 Views
Those were the good old days. - 04/10/2011 04:02:33 PM 634 Views
*NM* - 04/10/2011 10:02:30 PM 534 Views
I agree, it's driving me nuts *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:36:45 PM 524 Views
That's not quite right, actually. - 04/10/2011 03:25:54 PM 549 Views
Disagree. *NM* - 04/10/2011 10:04:09 PM 560 Views
Considering that "CaptainHammer" is LDS, I'd rather doubt he's gay. - 04/10/2011 02:32:56 AM 599 Views
Heh. Oh, Ryan. - 04/10/2011 04:36:43 PM 714 Views
*sigh* to all of you above.... - 04/10/2011 03:06:21 AM 634 Views
I thought that was "Do not talk about /b/"? *NM* - 04/10/2011 03:12:52 AM 621 Views
i don't know, but if THAT is the first rule... - 04/10/2011 03:41:20 AM 577 Views
Please explain why you think we should consider you Christians. - 03/10/2011 04:33:06 PM 1105 Views
you know, that does make me wonder though - 03/10/2011 04:58:21 PM 997 Views
We're not as immovable as we are sometimes portrayed. - 03/10/2011 05:27:17 PM 975 Views
"Even Christ didn't do that"? I can't agree. - 03/10/2011 09:00:34 PM 942 Views
I conceded your last point. - 03/10/2011 10:14:28 PM 859 Views
Point of Anal Retentive Dissent: - 04/10/2011 03:54:00 PM 880 Views
That concept is alien to the Christian theological understanding, however. - 03/10/2011 10:18:55 PM 962 Views
I understand what both you and Danny are saying - 04/10/2011 12:19:57 AM 915 Views
Oh, that's very simple - 04/10/2011 04:02:24 AM 925 Views
I honestly don't know what it would take. - 04/10/2011 07:41:55 AM 943 Views
thank you, both of you - 04/10/2011 01:46:05 PM 928 Views
I love the Nicene Creed. It is such an excellent encapsulation. - 03/10/2011 06:07:53 PM 1002 Views
Agreed. - 04/10/2011 04:44:49 PM 889 Views
The absolute best part about your post (plus the best thing about Mo's/LDS's) - 03/10/2011 09:02:17 PM 939 Views
Glad you enjoyed it - 03/10/2011 10:10:39 PM 1048 Views
Though they can cause interesting changes in patterns. - 03/10/2011 10:16:55 PM 947 Views
We believe that Jesus Christ is the Savior of all mankind, and the only way back to God. - 04/10/2011 01:29:30 AM 1030 Views
If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss. - 04/10/2011 03:57:08 AM 1188 Views
I never said well-written, I said complex. - 04/10/2011 07:04:24 AM 1062 Views
Ignore facts all you want to. - 05/10/2011 01:07:35 AM 965 Views
Re: If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss. - 04/10/2011 07:24:27 AM 1169 Views
Woah nelly. - 04/10/2011 10:04:33 AM 982 Views
I have to "Wow" as well... racist much? - 04/10/2011 01:52:48 PM 898 Views
Re: I have to "Wow" as well... racist much? - 04/10/2011 04:42:47 PM 991 Views
oh well that makes it all better... - 04/10/2011 04:54:14 PM 1013 Views
Exactly - 04/10/2011 06:00:54 PM 898 Views
Was the twin banging and the gay wedding the same event? - 04/10/2011 06:36:03 PM 980 Views
I guess this is a variation on Hams punishment; Ghav, at least should know better than to be shocked - 04/10/2011 04:13:59 PM 879 Views
it's not that we're surprised because it's "novel" - 04/10/2011 04:19:16 PM 927 Views
It is not NECESSARILY racist. - 04/10/2011 04:39:33 PM 941 Views
Sure, except ... - 04/10/2011 04:50:53 PM 965 Views
Yeah, circular logic is fun, isn't it? - 05/10/2011 01:09:25 AM 900 Views
It it is nigh impossible to be a "non-Nicene Christian." - 04/10/2011 03:12:06 PM 972 Views
I think we've had this discussion before. - 06/10/2011 05:54:39 PM 958 Views
Arianism is a bad comparison for arguing LDS=Christian. - 06/10/2011 11:45:36 PM 847 Views
Wikipedia confirms what I already thought: you're off base with the monophysitism. - 07/10/2011 12:06:40 AM 1212 Views
I was just saying there were competing views. - 07/10/2011 07:49:26 PM 1330 Views
That sounds really nice. - 04/10/2011 06:38:29 PM 917 Views
Why wait though? - 05/10/2011 12:12:21 AM 1101 Views
So that Vivien can avoid reading and thinking about the stuff that you just wrote. *NM* - 05/10/2011 12:28:23 AM 510 Views
Ack, not reading and thinking111 - 05/10/2011 12:36:11 AM 930 Views
Yeah, that's what I thought. - 06/10/2011 05:43:57 PM 843 Views
I'm satisfied by that explanation. - 06/10/2011 08:51:15 PM 1093 Views
Re: I'm satisfied by that explanation. - 07/10/2011 07:45:29 PM 938 Views
Oh no you idn't... *waves finger and weaves head* - 04/10/2011 03:53:07 AM 767 Views
....i don't know what you look like - 04/10/2011 03:54:56 AM 905 Views
Took the words right out of my mouth, repeatedly. - 04/10/2011 12:49:13 PM 1097 Views
Off-Topic - 05/10/2011 01:14:16 AM 894 Views
Hmm - 05/10/2011 02:03:13 AM 1052 Views
True - 05/10/2011 02:13:00 AM 852 Views
I think of Protestantism in terms similar to a Xerox copy. - 05/10/2011 04:57:42 AM 956 Views
Maybe Xeroxes of abridged texts and dumbed down theology - 06/10/2011 02:26:58 AM 1083 Views
I like that analogy - an echo chamber! *NM* - 08/10/2011 10:44:04 PM 548 Views
Re: Off-Topic - 05/10/2011 02:56:50 AM 1080 Views
Uhh... - 05/10/2011 03:08:49 AM 899 Views
The people at the Nicene Council and the other councils were not prophets. - 05/10/2011 04:59:50 AM 1007 Views
And you know that because... why, again? - 05/10/2011 07:13:53 AM 926 Views
Tough Crowd. - 03/10/2011 04:44:31 PM 1045 Views
No questions. Have a nice day. - 03/10/2011 11:40:58 PM 904 Views
Why don't they have anything approaching a formal theology? *NM* - 04/10/2011 03:58:16 AM 635 Views
Re: Why don't they have anything approaching a formal theology? - 04/10/2011 05:23:12 PM 1004 Views

Reply to Message