Active Users:373 Time:29/06/2024 03:51:16 PM
Mmm, dashing. Nate Send a noteboard - 05/10/2011 09:02:53 PM
Two that I noticed, technically. In #8, it should be Have at the start of the question. In #9, there should be a dash between "140" and "character". Otherwise you could be talking about 140 shortcuts for characters.


I was actually researching when it was appropriate to use a dash. Do you know what I found out? There are some general rules about it but, for the most part, it's really a style choice. I guess it's one of those quirky, undefined areas of writing. Or can it ever really be defined?


There are certainly a lot of ways they can be used or not used, and people manage to use every single one of them. In my estimation they're good to use whenever they clear up potential ambiguity, such as in your case. A starker example comes from a movie title, "Eight Legged Freaks". Are they freaks with eight legs or are they eight freaks, all of whom have legs? The title doesn't actually make that clear, even though through context and general agreement we know that it means freaks with eight legs. However, you can completely clear any trouble up with a simple dash. "Eight-Legged Freaks". Voila! So whether or not people agree on how to use them, that is how and when I believe they should be used. Note however that this is a difficult one to remember when writing something, and is often the sort of thing a person only catches when proofreading.
Warder to starry_nite

Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Reply to message
Grammar junkies - 05/10/2011 06:46:31 PM 1004 Views
I'm not always sure that I'm correct, but.... - 05/10/2011 07:04:13 PM 695 Views
I didn't see any errors - 05/10/2011 07:24:27 PM 674 Views
Re: I didn't see any errors - 06/10/2011 03:14:07 PM 554 Views
You mean ... - 06/10/2011 03:58:32 PM 604 Views
Must ... have ... grammar. - 05/10/2011 07:53:34 PM 861 Views
For you and Tom as well, the same question about question eight. - 05/10/2011 08:33:39 PM 1077 Views
Tom can probably give you actual terms and correct rules, but here's my take on it. - 05/10/2011 08:43:47 PM 635 Views
That makes sense as far as it goes. - 05/10/2011 09:02:42 PM 667 Views
But do you actually regard them that way? - 05/10/2011 09:08:36 PM 656 Views
Yeah, pretty much. - 05/10/2011 09:25:18 PM 613 Views
Re: Yeah, pretty much. - 05/10/2011 09:29:33 PM 491 Views
OK then. - 05/10/2011 09:59:50 PM 653 Views
You bring up a point that I was researching the other day - 05/10/2011 08:53:40 PM 713 Views
You guys mean a hyphen, not a dash. - 05/10/2011 09:00:25 PM 655 Views
You're right of course! - 05/10/2011 09:13:44 PM 725 Views
I frequently am. - 05/10/2011 09:16:38 PM 731 Views
So I've noticed. - 05/10/2011 09:19:38 PM 649 Views
I like telling people, too. - 05/10/2011 09:34:50 PM 637 Views
You can use charmap. - 05/10/2011 10:21:32 PM 685 Views
Re: You guys mean a hyphen, not a dash. - 06/10/2011 01:15:02 PM 602 Views
Mmm, dashing. - 05/10/2011 09:02:53 PM 642 Views
Emdashing is an entirely different form of punctuation. - 05/10/2011 09:07:36 PM 694 Views
Achtung! Grammatik! :insert Nazi-saluting smiley as the Wehrmacht marches by: - 05/10/2011 08:10:45 PM 753 Views
I love this bit. - 05/10/2011 08:26:52 PM 761 Views
Bring back the BSG! - 05/10/2011 08:55:32 PM 675 Views
Re: your 2nd irritating error for question 2 - 06/10/2011 04:12:49 PM 622 Views
Good poll, especially for this site. - 05/10/2011 08:11:10 PM 744 Views
Re: serial comma. - 05/10/2011 08:31:58 PM 644 Views
Maybe I was being a little anal there. - 05/10/2011 08:35:33 PM 603 Views
Same here - 05/10/2011 08:43:34 PM 540 Views
I think it's conventional to use a comma before "etc". - 05/10/2011 08:55:11 PM 617 Views
Re: Grammar junkies - 05/10/2011 08:33:06 PM 652 Views
Re: Grammar junkies - 05/10/2011 08:49:43 PM 705 Views
People should talk in a way that can be understood, else they are not communicating. - 05/10/2011 09:17:37 PM 694 Views
Re: "everyone's". ~winky~ *NM* - 05/10/2011 09:22:18 PM 329 Views
Is it time for my lecture on superfluous apostrophes again? - 05/10/2011 09:43:47 PM 610 Views
You mean your lecture on "superfluous" apostrophes. - 05/10/2011 09:53:31 PM 561 Views
As have I. Multiple times. *NM* - 05/10/2011 09:55:08 PM 296 Views
I am not stubborn, just true to my convictions. - 05/10/2011 09:56:39 PM 816 Views
Unsurprisingly, I don't really agree with you at all on this point. :p - 05/10/2011 10:29:59 PM 678 Views
I do not really think I am "right" on this one so much as "not wrong." - 06/10/2011 12:01:36 AM 590 Views
But contradictions are inherent in the entire English language! - 06/10/2011 01:25:39 AM 608 Views
Sure, but not deliberate ones created by grammarians who know better. - 06/10/2011 05:40:58 AM 610 Views
I'm going to listen to the others. - 06/10/2011 06:17:18 AM 635 Views
Like I say, I appreciate exceptions when justified (and again, only claiming to be "not wrong." ) - 06/10/2011 07:26:18 AM 530 Views
But you are wrong - 06/10/2011 02:17:40 PM 661 Views
that is OK he is very good at being wrong *NM* - 06/10/2011 03:43:23 PM 354 Views
I disagree. - 07/10/2011 12:15:14 AM 608 Views
How utterly unsurprising - 07/10/2011 02:21:38 PM 555 Views
"We want to be nothing if not persistent." - 07/10/2011 02:39:19 PM 602 Views
Doesn't matter. - 07/10/2011 03:12:14 PM 651 Views
What. - 06/10/2011 06:17:41 PM 704 Views
You called? - 05/10/2011 08:53:54 PM 662 Views
Grammar schmammar! - 05/10/2011 09:01:47 PM 741 Views
Wongy tip #77 - 05/10/2011 11:15:12 PM 602 Views
#1) I do not use NetSpeak while playing games, texting or using social media. - 05/10/2011 11:34:12 PM 608 Views
What about NateSpeak? *NM* - 06/10/2011 04:01:08 PM 307 Views
I did use that once to tell the story of you and CNRedDragon going to see Ice Princess. *NM* - 07/10/2011 01:46:50 AM 307 Views
A timeless classic. - 07/10/2011 01:53:36 AM 578 Views
Re: Grammar junkies - 06/10/2011 01:17:28 AM 629 Views
Yes. - 06/10/2011 06:53:46 AM 565 Views
I forgot about "of" for "have." - 06/10/2011 07:31:11 AM 602 Views
I try - 06/10/2011 09:18:29 AM 655 Views
I freebase split infinitives on a regular basis. - 06/10/2011 01:53:36 PM 536 Views
The split infinitive is not grammatically incorrect. - 06/10/2011 02:04:34 PM 561 Views
I wish more people knew this. - 06/10/2011 07:38:46 PM 552 Views
Junky Grammar. - 06/10/2011 04:24:01 PM 545 Views

Reply to Message