Active Users:1110 Time:23/11/2024 02:10:36 AM
OK, within the Mormon context I can see that point. Joel Send a noteboard - 05/10/2011 12:33:52 AM
Guess I was the one being hypersensitive this time; sorry, ladies. :<img class=' /> For what it is worth, there are plenty of female Church leaders in the Old and New Testament alike, Pauls rejection of it notwithstanding; Paul is not God. He explicitly makes that point himself prior to one of his admonitions; in some ways the OT canon is a lot more comfortable than the NT because, while one may not agree with that view of it, the OT is always very clear about what is considered divinely inspired (i.e. all of it.) With the NT it is often less clear when an author is speaking as an Apostle of God and when it is just Paul telling a protege to drink some occasional wine for his upset tummy (though I fail to see how that would HELP.)
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Mormons - 03/10/2011 05:46:10 AM 2362 Views
Questions. - 03/10/2011 11:13:25 AM 1115 Views
Ooh! Ooh! - 03/10/2011 11:18:38 AM 965 Views
I don't watch it. - 04/10/2011 01:34:53 AM 971 Views
Re: Questions. - 03/10/2011 01:28:28 PM 1078 Views
Re: Questions. - 03/10/2011 01:31:13 PM 903 Views
Why did I look up what Quorn is? I didn't need to know that. *NM* - 03/10/2011 02:04:20 PM 628 Views
Wyld Stallyns!! - 03/10/2011 03:26:54 PM 902 Views
STATION! *NM* - 03/10/2011 11:00:35 PM 553 Views
Re: One of the best replies, ever, on the internet. *NM* - 06/10/2011 02:43:07 AM 601 Views
....did we just get door-to-door'd...ONLINE?!?! *NM* - 03/10/2011 11:34:19 AM 573 Views
Nope. - 04/10/2011 01:32:43 AM 957 Views
there's no real point to it - 04/10/2011 02:37:24 AM 1956 Views
We could use an evil cackling smilie, we do have some other evil ones - 04/10/2011 02:49:12 AM 924 Views
wasn't going to argue... *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:57:00 AM 546 Views
Do you ever giggle at the name "Moroni?" - 03/10/2011 11:39:55 AM 1023 Views
There are Mormon literalists? Seriously? *NM* - 03/10/2011 03:02:18 PM 564 Views
I know they don't have multiple wives anymore, so no misconception there - 03/10/2011 01:23:50 PM 949 Views
There are Fundamentalist "Mormons" who do... - 03/10/2011 11:32:56 PM 881 Views
Don't get me wrong by the way, I've met wonderful Mormons - 04/10/2011 12:22:03 PM 922 Views
Question: Why are you such a faggot? *NM* - 03/10/2011 02:23:45 PM 467 Views
Answer: because it's the only way he could return your burning love for him. - 03/10/2011 03:24:23 PM 694 Views
Oh dont be such a fuddy duddy. - 03/10/2011 10:42:06 PM 584 Views
Better a faggot than a fuckwad. Cheers fuckwad! *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:27:20 AM 588 Views
Well, I suppose you'ld be the one to know. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:54:35 AM 525 Views
Really? You really just pulled a "takes one to know one"? *NM* - 04/10/2011 04:19:22 PM 618 Views
Re: You embarrass yourself. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:56:02 AM 474 Views
I'll tell you whats embarresing... - 04/10/2011 02:08:02 AM 798 Views
That is hilarious. - 04/10/2011 03:10:50 AM 689 Views
Goodness.. - 04/10/2011 03:20:30 AM 632 Views
Re: - 04/10/2011 03:28:25 AM 664 Views
You know, my mother had a saying. - 04/10/2011 03:39:32 AM 697 Views
I think it's safe to say ... - 04/10/2011 04:09:17 AM 598 Views
I'm not sure which would be sadder... - 04/10/2011 11:32:55 AM 735 Views
*NM* - 04/10/2011 12:19:01 PM 562 Views
Re: You flatter me. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:31:01 PM 583 Views
OK, you need to delete the "Re:" You're using it incorrectly - 04/10/2011 01:55:53 PM 609 Views
"Re" doesn't have to mean "reply", it can also mean "regarding". - 04/10/2011 02:01:31 PM 640 Views
Re: Re: - 04/10/2011 02:06:58 PM 638 Views
Re: Re: - 04/10/2011 02:12:57 PM 604 Views
Re: Also. - 04/10/2011 02:08:15 PM 649 Views
you are still using it incorrectly. *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:09:48 PM 596 Views
He's doing it on purpose though. - 04/10/2011 03:31:39 PM 707 Views
Re: Yeah, it's just a shtick... - 04/10/2011 03:47:17 PM 605 Views
Those were the good old days. - 04/10/2011 04:02:33 PM 634 Views
*NM* - 04/10/2011 10:02:30 PM 534 Views
I agree, it's driving me nuts *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:36:45 PM 524 Views
That's not quite right, actually. - 04/10/2011 03:25:54 PM 549 Views
Disagree. *NM* - 04/10/2011 10:04:09 PM 560 Views
Considering that "CaptainHammer" is LDS, I'd rather doubt he's gay. - 04/10/2011 02:32:56 AM 599 Views
Heh. Oh, Ryan. - 04/10/2011 04:36:43 PM 714 Views
*sigh* to all of you above.... - 04/10/2011 03:06:21 AM 634 Views
I thought that was "Do not talk about /b/"? *NM* - 04/10/2011 03:12:52 AM 621 Views
i don't know, but if THAT is the first rule... - 04/10/2011 03:41:20 AM 577 Views
Please explain why you think we should consider you Christians. - 03/10/2011 04:33:06 PM 1104 Views
you know, that does make me wonder though - 03/10/2011 04:58:21 PM 996 Views
We're not as immovable as we are sometimes portrayed. - 03/10/2011 05:27:17 PM 974 Views
"Even Christ didn't do that"? I can't agree. - 03/10/2011 09:00:34 PM 941 Views
I conceded your last point. - 03/10/2011 10:14:28 PM 858 Views
Point of Anal Retentive Dissent: - 04/10/2011 03:54:00 PM 880 Views
That concept is alien to the Christian theological understanding, however. - 03/10/2011 10:18:55 PM 962 Views
I understand what both you and Danny are saying - 04/10/2011 12:19:57 AM 915 Views
Oh, that's very simple - 04/10/2011 04:02:24 AM 924 Views
I honestly don't know what it would take. - 04/10/2011 07:41:55 AM 942 Views
thank you, both of you - 04/10/2011 01:46:05 PM 927 Views
I love the Nicene Creed. It is such an excellent encapsulation. - 03/10/2011 06:07:53 PM 1002 Views
Agreed. - 04/10/2011 04:44:49 PM 887 Views
The absolute best part about your post (plus the best thing about Mo's/LDS's) - 03/10/2011 09:02:17 PM 938 Views
Glad you enjoyed it - 03/10/2011 10:10:39 PM 1047 Views
Though they can cause interesting changes in patterns. - 03/10/2011 10:16:55 PM 947 Views
We believe that Jesus Christ is the Savior of all mankind, and the only way back to God. - 04/10/2011 01:29:30 AM 1030 Views
If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss. - 04/10/2011 03:57:08 AM 1188 Views
I never said well-written, I said complex. - 04/10/2011 07:04:24 AM 1062 Views
Ignore facts all you want to. - 05/10/2011 01:07:35 AM 964 Views
Re: If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss. - 04/10/2011 07:24:27 AM 1169 Views
Woah nelly. - 04/10/2011 10:04:33 AM 982 Views
I have to "Wow" as well... racist much? - 04/10/2011 01:52:48 PM 898 Views
Re: I have to "Wow" as well... racist much? - 04/10/2011 04:42:47 PM 991 Views
oh well that makes it all better... - 04/10/2011 04:54:14 PM 1012 Views
Exactly - 04/10/2011 06:00:54 PM 898 Views
Was the twin banging and the gay wedding the same event? - 04/10/2011 06:36:03 PM 979 Views
Yikes. Even for religion, that's more than a little crazy. - 04/10/2011 03:47:56 PM 984 Views
I don't think there's much of a difference in crazy as opposed to other more mainstream religions. - 04/10/2011 07:08:06 PM 962 Views
A difference exists if only in continued unabashed affirmation of a rather distasteful doctrine. - 04/10/2011 11:06:51 PM 956 Views
Then why can't women be priests? Or enter the altar? The curse on Eve is very much in place. *NM* - 05/10/2011 12:27:04 AM 524 Views
OK, within the Mormon context I can see that point. - 05/10/2011 12:33:52 AM 883 Views
They can in quite a few denominations. *NM* - 05/10/2011 06:12:35 AM 580 Views
Whoops! You meant in LDS specifically. My mistake. *NM* - 05/10/2011 06:14:05 AM 542 Views
Right now I am not making an absolute statement but a relative one. - 05/10/2011 08:37:50 PM 763 Views
Yes, that is kind of the problem. - 06/10/2011 12:13:27 AM 916 Views
I guess this is a variation on Hams punishment; Ghav, at least should know better than to be shocked - 04/10/2011 04:13:59 PM 879 Views
it's not that we're surprised because it's "novel" - 04/10/2011 04:19:16 PM 927 Views
It is not NECESSARILY racist. - 04/10/2011 04:39:33 PM 940 Views
Sure, except ... - 04/10/2011 04:50:53 PM 965 Views
Yeah, circular logic is fun, isn't it? - 05/10/2011 01:09:25 AM 898 Views
That sounds really nice. - 04/10/2011 06:38:29 PM 916 Views
Why wait though? - 05/10/2011 12:12:21 AM 1100 Views
So that Vivien can avoid reading and thinking about the stuff that you just wrote. *NM* - 05/10/2011 12:28:23 AM 510 Views
Ack, not reading and thinking111 - 05/10/2011 12:36:11 AM 930 Views
Yeah, that's what I thought. - 06/10/2011 05:43:57 PM 842 Views
I'm satisfied by that explanation. - 06/10/2011 08:51:15 PM 1092 Views
Re: I'm satisfied by that explanation. - 07/10/2011 07:45:29 PM 938 Views
Oh no you idn't... *waves finger and weaves head* - 04/10/2011 03:53:07 AM 766 Views
....i don't know what you look like - 04/10/2011 03:54:56 AM 905 Views
Took the words right out of my mouth, repeatedly. - 04/10/2011 12:49:13 PM 1097 Views
Off-Topic - 05/10/2011 01:14:16 AM 893 Views
Hmm - 05/10/2011 02:03:13 AM 1050 Views
True - 05/10/2011 02:13:00 AM 852 Views
I think of Protestantism in terms similar to a Xerox copy. - 05/10/2011 04:57:42 AM 956 Views
Maybe Xeroxes of abridged texts and dumbed down theology - 06/10/2011 02:26:58 AM 1083 Views
I like that analogy - an echo chamber! *NM* - 08/10/2011 10:44:04 PM 548 Views
Re: Off-Topic - 05/10/2011 02:56:50 AM 1080 Views
Uhh... - 05/10/2011 03:08:49 AM 897 Views
The people at the Nicene Council and the other councils were not prophets. - 05/10/2011 04:59:50 AM 1007 Views
And you know that because... why, again? - 05/10/2011 07:13:53 AM 926 Views
Tough Crowd. - 03/10/2011 04:44:31 PM 1044 Views
No questions. Have a nice day. - 03/10/2011 11:40:58 PM 903 Views
Why don't they have anything approaching a formal theology? *NM* - 04/10/2011 03:58:16 AM 635 Views
Re: Why don't they have anything approaching a formal theology? - 04/10/2011 05:23:12 PM 1004 Views

Reply to Message