Active Users:598 Time:31/03/2026 09:40:44 AM
It's not being marginalized. It's not worthy of discussion in the first place to need marginalizing Tom Send a noteboard - 28/09/2011 09:25:56 PM
More people show up when a celebrity is sighted in Manhattan than to these demonstrations, so it's no surprise that people pay little to no attention to them. Protests are a perfectly acceptable form of political expression, and I seem to remember tens of thousands of people coming out to protest the Iraq War before it even started. Those people made their voice heard and helped to sustain an opposition to the war.

By contrast, this demonstration is pathetic and sad. It attracted a few dozen people who ran the gamut from crazy to antisocial and it had no agenda. As such, it was a complete failure because it had no message and virtually no attendance. All these people were doing was blocking pedestrian traffic.

There is no reason why that should gain any sustained national media attention, any more than the about 100 people who were at a private movie showing I went to were worthy of media attention because they were waiting to see Jude Law.

The "relevant article" is the very definition of stupid. It says "a protest is newsworthy even if it's poorly attended, inarticulate and unpopular." That is patently not true.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
/Survey: The "occupy Wall Street" protest. - 28/09/2011 04:31:46 AM 909 Views
are there any counter-protests? - 28/09/2011 05:03:08 AM 613 Views
I'd go to an anti-asshole-cop protest. - 28/09/2011 06:07:16 AM 688 Views
Did anyone? - 28/09/2011 06:51:08 AM 710 Views
yeah with some popcorn to watch the wannabe hippies get pepper sprayed *NM* - 28/09/2011 01:28:36 PM 293 Views
Sure. I don't quite understand the hostility you and Tom have - 28/09/2011 02:05:06 PM 582 Views
Eric Cartman was right about the hippies - 28/09/2011 03:34:26 PM 656 Views
This is 2011. Calling all protesters "hippies" is like saying everyone in Starbucks is a beatnik - 28/09/2011 04:03:44 PM 654 Views
yes but douchebag hipsters takes doesn't really work - 28/09/2011 05:49:01 PM 621 Views
Uh, "back in the day" there were a lot of hippies in the civil disobedience camp. *NM* - 28/09/2011 05:48:36 PM 254 Views
and all why have now is wannabes who cry when the police are mean to them *NM* - 28/09/2011 05:50:24 PM 277 Views
That I agree with. *NM* - 29/09/2011 09:09:52 AM 276 Views
What exactly do they want, and how might it be accomplished? - 28/09/2011 03:55:32 PM 653 Views
Shrug- like I said, I'm not going to debate the policies - 28/09/2011 04:13:07 PM 585 Views
+1 *NM* - 29/09/2011 09:42:43 AM 236 Views
Perfectly said. - 28/09/2011 04:38:55 PM 631 Views
I cannot speak for them, but imagine there are three overarching complaints. - 28/09/2011 10:24:21 PM 750 Views
*NM* *NM* - 28/09/2011 10:45:38 PM 269 Views
Probably, if I didn't have and couldn't find a job in the US. - 28/09/2011 03:29:28 PM 611 Views
A relevant article to this thread, I think - 28/09/2011 07:08:20 PM 947 Views
it isn't be marginalized it is simply not significant - 28/09/2011 08:20:15 PM 762 Views
It's not being marginalized. It's not worthy of discussion in the first place to need marginalizing - 28/09/2011 09:25:56 PM 670 Views
so you got to meet Jude Law? *NM* - 28/09/2011 11:01:14 PM 260 Views
For all of 5 seconds, yes. *NM* - 29/09/2011 01:43:23 AM 243 Views
Call in the Pinkertons *NM* - 28/09/2011 09:13:21 PM 257 Views
I can at least respect the honesty in that response. - 28/09/2011 09:28:44 PM 837 Views
Re: Yes. *NM* - 29/09/2011 02:48:38 AM 318 Views
No, I have a life. *NM* - 29/09/2011 04:01:50 AM 255 Views

Reply to Message