Active Users:424 Time:20/04/2025 02:44:13 PM
Probably, if I didn't have and couldn't find a job in the US. Joel Send a noteboard - 28/09/2011 03:29:28 PM
The Catch 22 of these kinds of things is that for the 99% to get actively involved over the long term requires an amount of time and effort that tends to preclude the time and effort necessary to feed, clothe and house themselves and their families under any system like the one their protesting. That, of course, is a key design feature of said system; only when many people become convinced providing for their families is no longer POSSIBLE without fundamental reform will they be willing and therefore able to devote most of their energy to accomplishing any large scale change.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
/Survey: The "occupy Wall Street" protest. - 28/09/2011 04:31:46 AM 816 Views
are there any counter-protests? - 28/09/2011 05:03:08 AM 528 Views
I'd go to an anti-asshole-cop protest. - 28/09/2011 06:07:16 AM 599 Views
Did anyone? - 28/09/2011 06:51:08 AM 619 Views
yeah with some popcorn to watch the wannabe hippies get pepper sprayed *NM* - 28/09/2011 01:28:36 PM 258 Views
Sure. I don't quite understand the hostility you and Tom have - 28/09/2011 02:05:06 PM 483 Views
Eric Cartman was right about the hippies - 28/09/2011 03:34:26 PM 562 Views
This is 2011. Calling all protesters "hippies" is like saying everyone in Starbucks is a beatnik - 28/09/2011 04:03:44 PM 564 Views
yes but douchebag hipsters takes doesn't really work - 28/09/2011 05:49:01 PM 534 Views
Uh, "back in the day" there were a lot of hippies in the civil disobedience camp. *NM* - 28/09/2011 05:48:36 PM 218 Views
and all why have now is wannabes who cry when the police are mean to them *NM* - 28/09/2011 05:50:24 PM 242 Views
That I agree with. *NM* - 29/09/2011 09:09:52 AM 238 Views
What exactly do they want, and how might it be accomplished? - 28/09/2011 03:55:32 PM 549 Views
Shrug- like I said, I'm not going to debate the policies - 28/09/2011 04:13:07 PM 494 Views
+1 *NM* - 29/09/2011 09:42:43 AM 200 Views
Perfectly said. - 28/09/2011 04:38:55 PM 534 Views
I cannot speak for them, but imagine there are three overarching complaints. - 28/09/2011 10:24:21 PM 647 Views
*NM* *NM* - 28/09/2011 10:45:38 PM 228 Views
Probably, if I didn't have and couldn't find a job in the US. - 28/09/2011 03:29:28 PM 522 Views
A relevant article to this thread, I think - 28/09/2011 07:08:20 PM 806 Views
it isn't be marginalized it is simply not significant - 28/09/2011 08:20:15 PM 659 Views
It's not being marginalized. It's not worthy of discussion in the first place to need marginalizing - 28/09/2011 09:25:56 PM 572 Views
so you got to meet Jude Law? *NM* - 28/09/2011 11:01:14 PM 223 Views
For all of 5 seconds, yes. *NM* - 29/09/2011 01:43:23 AM 200 Views
Call in the Pinkertons *NM* - 28/09/2011 09:13:21 PM 219 Views
I can at least respect the honesty in that response. - 28/09/2011 09:28:44 PM 743 Views
Re: Yes. *NM* - 29/09/2011 02:48:38 AM 274 Views
No, I have a life. *NM* - 29/09/2011 04:01:50 AM 220 Views

Reply to Message