Active Users:592 Time:03/03/2026 03:09:45 PM
I stopped responfding when suddenly realized I didn't want to be in a Bush Iraq war debate random thoughts Send a noteboard - 21/09/2011 02:53:29 PM
It is old territory and no one wins. Bush had a lot of neocons on his staff that is true. Those neocons supported Clinton's regiume change policy and pushed for him to be more aggressive that is also true. They trended to be supporters of Israel and Hussein was paying rewards to the families of suicide bombers in Palestine so they didn't really like him. There were some who wanted to attack Iraq for the gross violations of the armistice agreement and for kicking out inspectors. That is also true. That there was a burning desire in the Bush administration to attack Iraq is a conspiracy theory BS backed more by emotion that facts.

Lets be honest there is very little chance of me convincing you there was not some plot to attack Iraq.
Reply to message
We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools. - 20/09/2011 06:50:36 AM 1382 Views
Logic classes would be good in schools. - 20/09/2011 10:23:56 AM 923 Views
Ugh. - 20/09/2011 11:30:59 AM 956 Views
Re: Ugh. - 21/09/2011 12:03:31 AM 877 Views
this is a controlled demolition - 21/09/2011 12:20:09 AM 998 Views
That is an incredibly stupid argument. - 21/09/2011 01:12:38 AM 937 Views
Asking questions is never wrong. - 20/09/2011 12:22:22 PM 841 Views
Re: Asking questions is never wrong. - 20/09/2011 11:57:04 PM 1003 Views
Agreed - 20/09/2011 01:09:40 PM 881 Views
There is compelling evidence that 9/11 was not what it seemed - 20/09/2011 03:06:58 PM 936 Views
No, there is not. - 20/09/2011 03:19:43 PM 1028 Views
Well, the circumstances were odd at least - 20/09/2011 03:26:40 PM 910 Views
As far as conspiracies go ... - 20/09/2011 03:36:35 PM 1008 Views
what would be the motive for the US doing something that stupid? - 20/09/2011 04:40:31 PM 827 Views
I'm not sure you got my gist. - 20/09/2011 04:46:28 PM 869 Views
I don't think there is any evidience that Bush wanted to attack Iraq before 9-11 - 20/09/2011 05:21:09 PM 887 Views
Um. Well, sure, that would be true. If you ignored all the evidence. - 20/09/2011 05:45:23 PM 947 Views
Well if you had argued that some Bush advisers wanted to attack Iraq I would have agreed - 20/09/2011 06:35:07 PM 925 Views
But that's what I DID argue. - 20/09/2011 06:47:17 PM 905 Views
sorry but you need to be more precise in your terms - 21/09/2011 02:37:36 PM 942 Views
I've always seen them as separate. - 21/09/2011 03:33:14 PM 768 Views
and that is why I decided to drop it - 21/09/2011 04:07:02 PM 937 Views
Heh. - 21/09/2011 04:15:34 PM 875 Views
And the explicit statement of a Bush Cabinet member. - 21/09/2011 06:59:47 AM 1002 Views
I'm still annoyed. - 21/09/2011 01:58:38 PM 809 Views
I stopped responfding when suddenly realized I didn't want to be in a Bush Iraq war debate - 21/09/2011 02:53:29 PM 812 Views
Admitting error is a sign of weakness; Don Draper said so. - 21/09/2011 05:37:31 PM 849 Views
In addition: - 20/09/2011 05:57:33 PM 1013 Views
sorry but that is nothing more than a simple statement of fact - 20/09/2011 06:40:51 PM 948 Views
This is very frustrating. - 20/09/2011 07:05:48 PM 901 Views
For the war on terror? - 20/09/2011 04:49:12 PM 948 Views
And what was the war on terror supposed to accomplish? - 20/09/2011 05:12:11 PM 890 Views
That contradicts the evidence. - 20/09/2011 06:15:48 PM 916 Views
Excuse me? - 20/09/2011 08:22:21 PM 977 Views
Huh? - 20/09/2011 08:57:14 PM 951 Views
the problem with any other theory is the make no sense - 20/09/2011 04:36:02 PM 872 Views
Contemplate this.... - 20/09/2011 04:27:52 PM 901 Views
You just did not go Star Trek on me - 20/09/2011 04:44:28 PM 916 Views
And how did you know... - 20/09/2011 05:17:10 PM 1001 Views
Re: And how did you know... - 21/09/2011 12:16:26 AM 991 Views
humans tend to be very bad at critical thinking - 20/09/2011 04:58:43 PM 857 Views
Won't help - 20/09/2011 08:15:36 PM 931 Views
Make 'em all take debate. - 20/09/2011 08:23:37 PM 873 Views
Would madam like a cane? - 20/09/2011 09:19:53 PM 1018 Views
Maybe a walker with tennis balls on the bottom. *NM* - 20/09/2011 10:33:39 PM 420 Views
Do you think it would help? - 21/09/2011 12:09:42 AM 875 Views
Re: We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools. - 21/09/2011 12:10:08 AM 901 Views
Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...? - 21/09/2011 01:05:18 AM 885 Views
Not actually the best example - 21/09/2011 01:56:03 AM 864 Views
what about the hole it cut into the frame of the building? - 21/09/2011 03:23:07 AM 894 Views
Wouldn't make much difference - 21/09/2011 04:08:27 AM 902 Views
OK thanks *NM* - 21/09/2011 02:55:52 PM 467 Views
Re: Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...? - 21/09/2011 03:02:19 AM 920 Views
But how else would they fall down? - 21/09/2011 07:42:27 PM 788 Views
You would force Euler on to the masses? - 21/09/2011 03:21:40 PM 947 Views
You could still argue. - 21/09/2011 04:06:51 PM 821 Views
I didn't mean to imply that it is no fun to argue with a like-minded person - 21/09/2011 04:15:47 PM 842 Views
Eh, nobody uses pure logic all of the time anyway. - 21/09/2011 10:43:51 PM 917 Views
Or they could just do more math. Cold, hard, beautiful math. - 21/09/2011 04:01:05 PM 828 Views
I love geometry proofs. - 21/09/2011 04:10:57 PM 963 Views
Me too <3 proofs! *NM* - 21/09/2011 07:55:38 PM 452 Views
For pure enjoyment, here's a non math version. - 21/09/2011 10:10:40 PM 869 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/09/2011 07:59:57 PM 393 Views
Now we are talking... Everyone can benefit from some basic Euclid. - 21/09/2011 08:32:17 PM 1089 Views
Ha. Ha. - 21/09/2011 09:56:38 PM 886 Views
As a follower of Cthulhu, I strongly disagree. - 21/09/2011 11:13:55 PM 1071 Views

Reply to Message