Active Users:920 Time:15/09/2025 08:08:15 PM
For the war on terror? Dark Knight Send a noteboard - 20/09/2011 04:49:12 PM
Please don't say to justify the war in Iraq if you cannot explain why they wouldn't have made some effort to link Iraq to the attack. I mean if they are going to be evil enough to have Americans killed to start a war you would think they would want a little better link to guy they want to go war with. Sorry but the nicest thing you can say about the idea the US was involved is that it is stupid.


For a dramatic example on why we need to stop terrorists? After all, Pearl Harbor was the springboard American people needed to send us to war. Maybe the CIA thought another Pearl Harbor was needed because the fight against terrorists had very little support. Of course, a good amount of people still want us to leave the Middle East. So who knows.
Formerly Mat Bloody Cauthon on Wotmania, blessed be its name
Reply to message
We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools. - 20/09/2011 06:50:36 AM 1327 Views
Logic classes would be good in schools. - 20/09/2011 10:23:56 AM 876 Views
Ugh. - 20/09/2011 11:30:59 AM 901 Views
Re: Ugh. - 21/09/2011 12:03:31 AM 828 Views
this is a controlled demolition - 21/09/2011 12:20:09 AM 947 Views
That is an incredibly stupid argument. - 21/09/2011 01:12:38 AM 880 Views
Asking questions is never wrong. - 20/09/2011 12:22:22 PM 776 Views
Re: Asking questions is never wrong. - 20/09/2011 11:57:04 PM 944 Views
Agreed - 20/09/2011 01:09:40 PM 832 Views
There is compelling evidence that 9/11 was not what it seemed - 20/09/2011 03:06:58 PM 888 Views
No, there is not. - 20/09/2011 03:19:43 PM 973 Views
Well, the circumstances were odd at least - 20/09/2011 03:26:40 PM 855 Views
As far as conspiracies go ... - 20/09/2011 03:36:35 PM 949 Views
what would be the motive for the US doing something that stupid? - 20/09/2011 04:40:31 PM 769 Views
I'm not sure you got my gist. - 20/09/2011 04:46:28 PM 809 Views
I don't think there is any evidience that Bush wanted to attack Iraq before 9-11 - 20/09/2011 05:21:09 PM 834 Views
Um. Well, sure, that would be true. If you ignored all the evidence. - 20/09/2011 05:45:23 PM 891 Views
Well if you had argued that some Bush advisers wanted to attack Iraq I would have agreed - 20/09/2011 06:35:07 PM 873 Views
But that's what I DID argue. - 20/09/2011 06:47:17 PM 856 Views
sorry but you need to be more precise in your terms - 21/09/2011 02:37:36 PM 881 Views
I've always seen them as separate. - 21/09/2011 03:33:14 PM 722 Views
and that is why I decided to drop it - 21/09/2011 04:07:02 PM 873 Views
Heh. - 21/09/2011 04:15:34 PM 824 Views
And the explicit statement of a Bush Cabinet member. - 21/09/2011 06:59:47 AM 927 Views
I'm still annoyed. - 21/09/2011 01:58:38 PM 763 Views
Admitting error is a sign of weakness; Don Draper said so. - 21/09/2011 05:37:31 PM 791 Views
In addition: - 20/09/2011 05:57:33 PM 954 Views
sorry but that is nothing more than a simple statement of fact - 20/09/2011 06:40:51 PM 903 Views
This is very frustrating. - 20/09/2011 07:05:48 PM 853 Views
For the war on terror? - 20/09/2011 04:49:12 PM 888 Views
And what was the war on terror supposed to accomplish? - 20/09/2011 05:12:11 PM 835 Views
That contradicts the evidence. - 20/09/2011 06:15:48 PM 860 Views
Excuse me? - 20/09/2011 08:22:21 PM 930 Views
Huh? - 20/09/2011 08:57:14 PM 906 Views
the problem with any other theory is the make no sense - 20/09/2011 04:36:02 PM 830 Views
Contemplate this.... - 20/09/2011 04:27:52 PM 851 Views
You just did not go Star Trek on me - 20/09/2011 04:44:28 PM 864 Views
And how did you know... - 20/09/2011 05:17:10 PM 947 Views
Re: And how did you know... - 21/09/2011 12:16:26 AM 934 Views
humans tend to be very bad at critical thinking - 20/09/2011 04:58:43 PM 793 Views
Won't help - 20/09/2011 08:15:36 PM 863 Views
Make 'em all take debate. - 20/09/2011 08:23:37 PM 828 Views
Would madam like a cane? - 20/09/2011 09:19:53 PM 942 Views
Maybe a walker with tennis balls on the bottom. *NM* - 20/09/2011 10:33:39 PM 394 Views
Do you think it would help? - 21/09/2011 12:09:42 AM 822 Views
Re: We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools. - 21/09/2011 12:10:08 AM 839 Views
Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...? - 21/09/2011 01:05:18 AM 839 Views
Not actually the best example - 21/09/2011 01:56:03 AM 815 Views
what about the hole it cut into the frame of the building? - 21/09/2011 03:23:07 AM 854 Views
Wouldn't make much difference - 21/09/2011 04:08:27 AM 833 Views
OK thanks *NM* - 21/09/2011 02:55:52 PM 434 Views
Re: Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...? - 21/09/2011 03:02:19 AM 874 Views
But how else would they fall down? - 21/09/2011 07:42:27 PM 733 Views
You would force Euler on to the masses? - 21/09/2011 03:21:40 PM 898 Views
You could still argue. - 21/09/2011 04:06:51 PM 762 Views
I didn't mean to imply that it is no fun to argue with a like-minded person - 21/09/2011 04:15:47 PM 796 Views
Eh, nobody uses pure logic all of the time anyway. - 21/09/2011 10:43:51 PM 859 Views
Or they could just do more math. Cold, hard, beautiful math. - 21/09/2011 04:01:05 PM 779 Views
I love geometry proofs. - 21/09/2011 04:10:57 PM 917 Views
Me too <3 proofs! *NM* - 21/09/2011 07:55:38 PM 426 Views
For pure enjoyment, here's a non math version. - 21/09/2011 10:10:40 PM 794 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/09/2011 07:59:57 PM 367 Views
Now we are talking... Everyone can benefit from some basic Euclid. - 21/09/2011 08:32:17 PM 1037 Views
Ha. Ha. - 21/09/2011 09:56:38 PM 840 Views
As a follower of Cthulhu, I strongly disagree. - 21/09/2011 11:13:55 PM 1006 Views

Reply to Message