Active Users:1169 Time:23/11/2024 03:29:07 AM
No I do not believe they are needed, nor do I believe they should be desired Roland00 Send a noteboard - 25/08/2011 10:47:51 PM
Nice try ;) My argument may be a strawman and I don't see but to prove you will need to show how I am misstating the schools position.

It was an example of fuzzy thinking. Do you believe scholarships
for GLBT are needed to increase the diversity of liberal arts schools?

No I do not believe they are needed, nor do I believe they should be desired.
1) Yet they are a private institution so I believe they should have the right to offer them if they want, for it isn't hurt people.
2) I also understand it is good business sense to offer these scholarships in the way they are doing so.

Pretty much I do not see this as right vs left, but instead a tactic at profit maximization. Even though this is a school, it is also very much a business and the school is doing what it needs to gain additional revenue sources ;)
Reply to message
A fine example of the fuzzy logic of the left - 25/08/2011 06:30:36 PM 1015 Views
Personally I still favor demographic blind subsidies as the best route to meritocracy. - 25/08/2011 08:18:20 PM 600 Views
it works for gender as well - 25/08/2011 09:02:58 PM 612 Views
Sure; insert your demographic here. - 26/08/2011 12:51:48 AM 655 Views
Preferential in possible scholarships but not admissions process according to the article - 25/08/2011 10:26:25 PM 512 Views
What's your point? - 26/08/2011 12:54:41 AM 492 Views
There are colleges that don't allow homosexuals - or men, or women for that matter. - 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM 597 Views
Alright then, socially unacceptable. - 26/08/2011 01:00:16 AM 628 Views
Ummm, did you read the article? - 25/08/2011 08:40:46 PM 661 Views
Ah, but you are not reading it either - 25/08/2011 08:53:39 PM 677 Views
But that's just a scholarship. - 25/08/2011 09:34:23 PM 637 Views
it is a scholarship program not a admissions program - 25/08/2011 09:12:47 PM 623 Views
I don't really have a problem with this - 25/08/2011 09:03:55 PM 701 Views
I am not arguing that they shouldn't be allowed to do it - 25/08/2011 09:29:54 PM 524 Views
Fair Enough - 25/08/2011 09:41:25 PM 568 Views
their stated motive was to increase diversity - 25/08/2011 10:09:17 PM 690 Views
One of your lines struck me. - 25/08/2011 10:12:32 PM 667 Views
that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result - 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM 509 Views
That's an interesting point... - 25/08/2011 10:37:37 PM 594 Views
Re: that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result - 25/08/2011 10:55:29 PM 615 Views
It's also worth noting ... - 25/08/2011 11:00:35 PM 494 Views
Wow what a strawman - 25/08/2011 10:23:45 PM 685 Views
yes to bad none of that address the point I was making which would make your argument a strawman - 25/08/2011 10:40:01 PM 471 Views
No I do not believe they are needed, nor do I believe they should be desired - 25/08/2011 10:47:51 PM 664 Views
so you don't disagree with me or you do? - 25/08/2011 11:47:05 PM 616 Views
Ridiculous. Everyone knows conservatives are incapable of creativity. - 25/08/2011 11:12:10 PM 487 Views
are they going to make students prove they are GLBT? - 25/08/2011 11:36:58 PM 553 Views
I think it's less a failing of the "left"... - 26/08/2011 03:25:42 AM 616 Views
I agree there is a lot of fuzzy logic on the right as well - 26/08/2011 02:41:03 PM 552 Views
*nod* I don't deny that it's a problem - 26/08/2011 04:26:56 PM 663 Views
a question for you... - 26/08/2011 08:08:10 PM 723 Views

Reply to Message