1) Only 1 university has done this. Thus you can't really argue this is a trend
2) This is a private organization since it is a private school, thus no state funds are directly funding it.
3) They are doing it for it is a receipt of success, via standing out. They are the only university in the US to do this, thus they are standing out via asking this question. It is a "signaling mechanism"
a) They are a private university who are competing for "talent," trying to get wealthy kids to go to their institution. Even if the kid is straight he may fell more likely to go to this school for it is inclusive, and he/she may see the school as more liberal, modern, and cosmopolitan. Or a closeted gay boy/girl who is still stuck in a hell that is high school may feel safe.
When you only have 3,400 undergrads and 230 grads students, an increase of 200 hundred students is an 6% increase in revenue. (And with tuition costing 30k a year, 200 additional students is 6 million more revenue a year.)
b) It is another way for the school to recruit funds from private donors/past alumni. Look how liberal, modern, cosmopolitan we are.
When you are one of many thousands of organizations, some times it pays to stand out. Elmhurst needs to be peoples 1st pick to succeed, no one spends 30k a year on a university to be a 2nd choice pick. Elmhurst needs stories to tell to get people excited to be there besides them being a liberal art school, and only 30 mins from downtown chicago and 25 mins away from Chicago O Hare.
2) This is a private organization since it is a private school, thus no state funds are directly funding it.
3) They are doing it for it is a receipt of success, via standing out. They are the only university in the US to do this, thus they are standing out via asking this question. It is a "signaling mechanism"
a) They are a private university who are competing for "talent," trying to get wealthy kids to go to their institution. Even if the kid is straight he may fell more likely to go to this school for it is inclusive, and he/she may see the school as more liberal, modern, and cosmopolitan. Or a closeted gay boy/girl who is still stuck in a hell that is high school may feel safe.
When you only have 3,400 undergrads and 230 grads students, an increase of 200 hundred students is an 6% increase in revenue. (And with tuition costing 30k a year, 200 additional students is 6 million more revenue a year.)
b) It is another way for the school to recruit funds from private donors/past alumni. Look how liberal, modern, cosmopolitan we are.
When you are one of many thousands of organizations, some times it pays to stand out. Elmhurst needs to be peoples 1st pick to succeed, no one spends 30k a year on a university to be a 2nd choice pick. Elmhurst needs stories to tell to get people excited to be there besides them being a liberal art school, and only 30 mins from downtown chicago and 25 mins away from Chicago O Hare.
A fine example of the fuzzy logic of the left
25/08/2011 06:30:36 PM
- 1014 Views
Personally I still favor demographic blind subsidies as the best route to meritocracy.
25/08/2011 08:18:20 PM
- 598 Views
Preferential in possible scholarships but not admissions process according to the article
25/08/2011 10:26:25 PM
- 510 Views
There are colleges that don't allow homosexuals - or men, or women for that matter.
25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM
- 595 Views
Ummm, did you read the article?
25/08/2011 08:40:46 PM
- 660 Views
Ah, but you are not reading it either
25/08/2011 08:53:39 PM
- 675 Views
But that's just a scholarship.
25/08/2011 09:34:23 PM
- 636 Views
so you would OK if the only offered it to straight students? *NM*
25/08/2011 09:50:44 PM
- 231 Views
You do realize that there are indeed universities refusing admission to gay students?
25/08/2011 10:02:41 PM
- 507 Views
I would have no problem with a LGBT only school as long as it didn't take state money
25/08/2011 10:27:48 PM
- 562 Views
This is a private university, not a state university *NM*
25/08/2011 10:29:15 PM
- 264 Views
sorry that ended with NM. Were you trying to make a point if so I missed it *NM*
25/08/2011 10:40:48 PM
- 277 Views
I expect some donor created a scholarship with that stipulation.
25/08/2011 10:40:09 PM
- 591 Views
I know my reply to his message may have made in seem that I was objecting to the scholarship
25/08/2011 11:10:33 PM
- 615 Views
If you're talking about "affirmative action", then yes, I oppose that.
26/08/2011 09:19:33 AM
- 548 Views
I don't really have a problem with this
25/08/2011 09:03:55 PM
- 699 Views
I am not arguing that they shouldn't be allowed to do it
25/08/2011 09:29:54 PM
- 522 Views
Fair Enough
25/08/2011 09:41:25 PM
- 566 Views
The United Church of Christ is a rather liberal denomination - celebrating gay marriages, notably.
25/08/2011 10:06:26 PM
- 531 Views
their stated motive was to increase diversity
25/08/2011 10:09:17 PM
- 689 Views
well. It could be they just needed a reason, but for some reason couldn't be forthright?
26/08/2011 03:28:52 AM
- 526 Views
One of your lines struck me.
25/08/2011 10:12:32 PM
- 665 Views
that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result
25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM
- 507 Views
That's an interesting point...
25/08/2011 10:37:37 PM
- 594 Views
yes but but despite how much he was hated by the left the right saw him different
25/08/2011 11:32:19 PM
- 706 Views
Re: yes but but despite how much he was hated by the left the right saw him different
26/08/2011 09:57:13 PM
- 609 Views
Re: that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result
25/08/2011 10:55:29 PM
- 615 Views
I don't think most people believed Obama was a centrist so much as the anti-Bush
26/08/2011 12:40:43 AM
- 538 Views
I think you'll find very few Europeans agreeing with that assessment.
26/08/2011 10:18:19 PM
- 512 Views
Wow what a strawman
25/08/2011 10:23:45 PM
- 684 Views
yes to bad none of that address the point I was making which would make your argument a strawman
25/08/2011 10:40:01 PM
- 470 Views
No I do not believe they are needed, nor do I believe they should be desired
25/08/2011 10:47:51 PM
- 662 Views
Ridiculous. Everyone knows conservatives are incapable of creativity.
25/08/2011 11:12:10 PM
- 487 Views
I would definetly check "yes"
26/08/2011 12:11:29 AM
- 674 Views
but if they wanted to increase diversity they would offer yo a scholarship for being Muslim
26/08/2011 12:46:46 AM
- 531 Views
id be a gay muslim, so Id be 3 minorities, a woman, a muslim and a lesbian, now if only I was black!
26/08/2011 02:16:50 AM
- 605 Views
I think it's less a failing of the "left"...
26/08/2011 03:25:42 AM
- 614 Views
a question for you...
26/08/2011 08:08:10 PM
- 723 Views
I guess my question for you is how I made it sound like LGBT=liberal
26/08/2011 09:47:16 PM
- 509 Views
My guess is because you referenced "the lefts" fuzzy logic in a thread about a LGBT scholarship.
26/08/2011 11:07:32 PM
- 669 Views