Active Users:1203 Time:23/11/2024 06:26:32 AM
Right. Joel Send a noteboard - 25/08/2011 08:13:56 PM
Not that I don't think it good that he is doing but some very not nice men have done exactly the same thing after spending years amassing vast fortunes. I think they start to feel guilty about having so much wealth that they really could never spend it. I know I would feel bad after that second or third billion. One of the few times you can feel bad in a good way and everyone still have their clothes on.

Carnegie's a fairly notorious case; he went from gunning down striking coal miners to endowing various still extant and effective charities; the Rockefellers went a similar route. My personal opinion has long been that as Carnegie started to "get religion" as he aged he began to worry about afterlife accountability, but Rockefeller seems to have felt a moral AND religious duty all his life (and still became the richest man in history).
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Isn't Warren Buffett such a nice man? - 25/08/2011 03:24:35 PM 683 Views
a lot of really rich men become philanthropist in their old age - 25/08/2011 03:44:57 PM 427 Views
Right. - 25/08/2011 08:13:56 PM 329 Views
I was going to buy B of A stock last week when it tanked. - 25/08/2011 05:19:29 PM 449 Views
I want to go live on a libertarian floating city. - 25/08/2011 05:38:26 PM 404 Views
I hadn't really considered nuclear options - 25/08/2011 05:45:01 PM 338 Views
Haha, it was actually a reference to the game Bioshock - 26/08/2011 03:30:39 AM 372 Views
He's a good man, but not unique in that respect - 25/08/2011 06:06:31 PM 363 Views
Re: He's a good man, but not unique in that respect - 25/08/2011 11:25:05 PM 433 Views
If done publicly, is charity really charity? - 26/08/2011 04:46:54 AM 508 Views
Yes. - 26/08/2011 04:51:41 AM 446 Views

Reply to Message