Active Users:457 Time:26/11/2024 03:56:54 AM
I got 35700, but I was perhaps too generous in ticking boxes. Legolas Send a noteboard - 21/08/2011 07:49:24 PM
I didn't tick boxes for those words which I recognized and which I would not stop and pause for when encountering them in context, but which I couldn't really define. I did tick the boxes if I could more or less define them, though only vaguely. So I dare say if I'd done it the same way as Camilla I'd have scored a good bit less than her, as well I might...

The non-native speakers get a rather extensive questionnaire about how they learned English, but I dare say they should've given a bit more range on their answering options than just "lots", "somewhat" and "not much". I've spent most days during the past ten years of my life reading/writing English one way or another for at least one hour a day and often more, what with this and other websites and the people I met here - and I'm not sure if they entirely realize how English-language music and movies have near-monopolies in a place like Flanders, either. It probably would've been more accurate to answer "absurdly much" to questions about how much English I practiced outside formal classes.
Reply to message
Help out these researchers: test your English vocabulary - 21/08/2011 03:07:24 PM 676 Views
I tried to be very conservative - 21/08/2011 04:55:08 PM 465 Views
That was my thought as well - 21/08/2011 06:24:06 PM 494 Views
Indeed. If you read their explanation, however, there's a decent reason for that. - 21/08/2011 06:27:34 PM 434 Views
I did read it - 21/08/2011 06:32:28 PM 363 Views
28,300 words. - 21/08/2011 05:52:10 PM 411 Views
Hmm - 21/08/2011 06:07:36 PM 445 Views
I got 35700, but I was perhaps too generous in ticking boxes. - 21/08/2011 07:49:24 PM 514 Views
The wife had the same reaction to "lots", "somewhat" and "not much". - 21/08/2011 10:15:05 PM 486 Views
Yeah, she would. - 21/08/2011 10:54:20 PM 424 Views
That makes sense. - 22/08/2011 03:49:18 PM 473 Views
I'm going to hope I misinterpreted that, but... - 22/08/2011 07:24:04 PM 396 Views
Nah, you got it, and I didn't. - 22/08/2011 08:27:33 PM 456 Views
37700 *NM* - 21/08/2011 08:52:29 PM 162 Views
Bah, 35,000 *NM* - 21/08/2011 10:02:43 PM 184 Views
I'm only slightly above average - 22/08/2011 04:07:02 AM 392 Views
39,000. It seemed pretty heavy on the Latin derivations. *NM* - 22/08/2011 04:48:23 AM 189 Views
28,800 - 22/08/2011 01:43:36 PM 385 Views
Trollop! Trollop was on the list! Low- 22,800. *NM* - 22/08/2011 08:43:21 PM 172 Views

Reply to Message