I didn't say no one agreed with just not enough to get him nominated so he is irrelevant
random thoughts Send a noteboard - 18/08/2011 11:14:50 PM
If me are you agree with him isn't the point, and for the record I agree with him on some points but far from all. The question is is he a viable candidate and the answer is no. His ideas are to radical and he could never get enough votes to win the nomination forget the general election. It isn't like this is first time, he has done this before and he always scores well in events were enthusiasm wins the day and he does piss poor in events where broad support are required. Sarah Palin has more chance of setting the Oval Office than he does I would give myself better odds than I would give Palin.
Ron Paul
18/08/2011 01:58:37 AM
- 525 Views
the media ignores him because he is irrelevant
18/08/2011 03:39:40 PM
- 410 Views
Or they're threatened by his changing the game which they make a living pretending to be experts on.
18/08/2011 10:19:06 PM
- 480 Views
I didn't say no one agreed with just not enough to get him nominated so he is irrelevant
18/08/2011 11:14:50 PM
- 415 Views
Because libertarianism doesn't rely on religion.
19/08/2011 04:26:56 PM
- 366 Views
Yes the reason the fanatic doesn't get more support is he is the wrong kind of fanatic *NM*
20/08/2011 02:52:26 PM
- 289 Views
I was being a smartass but not sarcaastic, I do think Paul is a fanatic *NM*
20/08/2011 11:41:40 PM
- 146 Views