Just a very simple question. Why does Ron Paul tend to be ignored in the Republican Party and the Tea Party? I got thinking about this after Jon Stewart's segment a couple of days back about this. His primary stances are libertarian conservative, and yet he is constantly downplayed in the Republican debates, he is less favoured in the media compared to Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachmann, who more or less jumped on the Tea Party bandwagon, when Ron Paul (to keep along with the metaphor) practically built it. Does anyone have a theory on why?
(P.S. Let's keep this civil, peeps. We don't want locked threads.
)
(P.S. Let's keep this civil, peeps. We don't want locked threads.
)
Ὦ ξεῖν', ἀγγέλλειν Λακεδαιμονίοις ὅτι τῇδε
κείμεθα, τοῖς κείνων ῥήμασι πειθόμενοι.
κείμεθα, τοῖς κείνων ῥήμασι πειθόμενοι.
Ron Paul
- 18/08/2011 01:58:37 AM
524 Views
the media ignores him because he is irrelevant
- 18/08/2011 03:39:40 PM
408 Views
Or they're threatened by his changing the game which they make a living pretending to be experts on.
- 18/08/2011 10:19:06 PM
479 Views
I didn't say no one agreed with just not enough to get him nominated so he is irrelevant
- 18/08/2011 11:14:50 PM
413 Views
Because libertarianism doesn't rely on religion.
- 19/08/2011 04:26:56 PM
365 Views
Yes the reason the fanatic doesn't get more support is he is the wrong kind of fanatic *NM*
- 20/08/2011 02:52:26 PM
289 Views
I was being a smartass but not sarcaastic, I do think Paul is a fanatic *NM*
- 20/08/2011 11:41:40 PM
146 Views