Because, when you get down to it, the debt ceilings very existence was always a political threat.
Joel Send a noteboard - 09/08/2011 05:02:12 PM
I'm honestly curious about that. From what I understand, the debt ceiling has been increased something like 100 times in the last 60 years. It's absolutely routine. Bush Jr's administration for example raised the debt limit by several trillion dollars. Clinton raised the limit, Bush Sr raised it, Reagan raised it, and on and on. The issue is more the ability to meet the interest payments, no?
And yes, taking on less debt is an integral first step in wrangling with the payments, but as you say, clearly the ceiling had to be raised again at this juncture. But given how commonplace such a procedure has been, why is that in itself such a talking point?
And yes, taking on less debt is an integral first step in wrangling with the payments, but as you say, clearly the ceiling had to be raised again at this juncture. But given how commonplace such a procedure has been, why is that in itself such a talking point?
I mean, to be brutally honest, the only real surprise here is not that Republicans finally decided to pull the trigger on that threat, but that they waited so long (of course, the fact that most Presidents in the last 30 years have been Republicans and they would've been bludgeoning their party leaders budgets might've helped. ) Now, IMHO, the statute itself has been alarmist theater from the beginning, and that it HAS been routinely raised so many times is a good argument it was always pointless as anything BUT a political weapon that should therefore never have been enshrined in US law to begin, but that's why it's a big deal: It was designed to be.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
US Credit Rate Downgraded - Obama should resign.....
06/08/2011 04:12:48 AM
- 1331 Views
Que tonterías.
06/08/2011 04:23:49 AM
- 858 Views
Really?
06/08/2011 05:05:48 AM
- 914 Views
Leaders have to lead.....
06/08/2011 05:18:21 AM
- 735 Views
Cuts aren't up to him, though.
06/08/2011 05:37:50 AM
- 783 Views
Yeah, sure, the President has no say or control.....good grief..... *NM*
06/08/2011 06:13:49 AM
- 446 Views
S&P didn't demand cuts, they demanded fiscal responsibility.
06/08/2011 03:18:10 PM
- 1016 Views
and haters gotta hate..... *NM*
06/08/2011 05:49:25 AM
- 427 Views
I admit it, I hate what Obama is doing to our country..... *NM*
06/08/2011 06:12:39 AM
- 438 Views
you, it was the tea party republicans that caused this
06/08/2011 05:57:16 AM
- 863 Views
As ever your disinterest in facts seems to be central to your posting.
06/08/2011 11:34:20 AM
- 827 Views
Which would be less annoying if so much of Congress didn't suffer from the same delusions.
06/08/2011 03:48:04 PM
- 750 Views
Does Timmy G play sax like his brother Kenny? *NM*
06/08/2011 01:11:17 PM
- 425 Views
Fun fact - I dated in HS Kenny G's niece.....
06/08/2011 03:13:52 PM
- 729 Views
S&P specifically cited GOP refusal to raise taxes among their reasons.
06/08/2011 03:10:22 PM
- 898 Views
Of course one could just read the actual S&P report
06/08/2011 04:01:07 PM
- 898 Views
Sure.
06/08/2011 04:53:47 PM
- 907 Views
Right, ABC new's summary of the report is not the report
06/08/2011 07:02:46 PM
- 1199 Views
Link works, but I'm not sure why you think it refutes snoops assessment or mine.
06/08/2011 08:35:10 PM
- 997 Views
It doesn't refute it, it just isn't this simple distillation you're offering
06/08/2011 09:23:33 PM
- 828 Views
It's more than half a sentence; I quoted several paragraphs.
06/08/2011 09:56:31 PM
- 714 Views
Well yes, after I gave you the report, I think I'm pretty obviously refering to before that
06/08/2011 11:02:17 PM
- 724 Views
Before that I was referring to the paragraphs quoted in the ABC report.
07/08/2011 01:21:18 AM
- 1128 Views
not really
06/08/2011 10:15:32 PM
- 789 Views
"the mix of spending and revenue measures"
06/08/2011 10:23:06 PM
- 855 Views
So you read the statement that they take no posistion as they take the dem position?
07/08/2011 04:51:58 AM
- 859 Views
I read a "mix" to be a mix.
09/08/2011 12:14:35 AM
- 767 Views
So in other words you just ignore the actaull words and read it say what you want it to say *NM*
09/08/2011 02:07:57 PM
- 488 Views
A mix of something and nothing is impossible; one thing is one thing, not a mix.
09/08/2011 04:56:00 PM
- 948 Views
US politicians are too busy fighting over who gets to play the fiddle. *NM*
06/08/2011 05:53:32 PM
- 441 Views
would him resigning really help?
07/08/2011 10:24:00 AM
- 823 Views
not as long as he has the high functioning moron Joe Biden as VP.
08/08/2011 12:34:32 AM
- 810 Views
In reality, its Congress (BOTH parties) AND the President who are to blame.
08/08/2011 01:59:13 AM
- 830 Views
40% is not a small tax increase and a small spending cut
09/08/2011 04:20:28 AM
- 711 Views
Why are people making a deal about the debt ceiling increase?
09/08/2011 03:42:13 PM
- 747 Views
Because, when you get down to it, the debt ceilings very existence was always a political threat.
09/08/2011 05:02:12 PM
- 719 Views