Active Users:407 Time:04/04/2025 07:11:09 AM
Re: Natural selection Night Walker Send a noteboard - 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM
NS is the process through which evolution acts. The process itself is governed by things like biological fitness. Fitness is determined by the genotype and phenotype of an individual to produce viable offspring. NS requires a selection pressure to “do its job”.

I think what you are having an issue with (based on reading other posts) is that it is impossible for us to know which trait will be beneficial to a given species in the wild before it happens. In order to test something like this we would have to have a static environment which is hard to come by. However some have managed it. Have you ever heard of the guppy experiment? That experiment shows how selection pressure causes natural selection for a certain trait and thus can alter the gene pool (and cause micro-evolution). In this environment you can then hypothesize about what traits will enhance ones fitness given the selection pressure. Thus you have tested NS.

Edit: I wanted to add that NS is not random like most people think it is. The random portion about NS is finding out which individuals, if any, have the "right" combo of genes for a given selection pressure. Thus if a selection pressure is great enough or radical enough some species will not have the "right" genes and go extinct. NS is very specific in selecting the animals in a species with certain traits.
Guppies
This message last edited by Night Walker on 07/08/2011 at 03:08:17 AM
Reply to message
Natural selection - 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM 1075 Views
selection for suitability - 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM 721 Views
Thanks for your responce - 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM 838 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it: - 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM 778 Views
Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM 766 Views
Yes it can - 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM 640 Views
But how? - 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM 837 Views
Okay, I think I see what you're saying - 08/08/2011 05:30:43 PM 654 Views
Close - 08/08/2011 05:41:46 PM 854 Views
Re: Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM 859 Views
I'm not sure I understand you - 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM 763 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies. - 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM 781 Views
Then it is still a tautology - 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM 791 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations. - 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM 892 Views
Maybe... - 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM 751 Views
As I understand it - 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM 711 Views
Better... - 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM 696 Views
Actually - 06/08/2011 10:13:51 PM 785 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 10:37:33 PM 924 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 11:38:52 PM 851 Views
Oeh - 07/08/2011 01:54:19 PM 700 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM 797 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 07:08:25 PM 798 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 07/08/2011 12:46:23 AM 792 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify... - 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM 815 Views
The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM 812 Views
Re: The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM 800 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question. - 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM 819 Views
TalkOrigins addresses this at length. - 06/08/2011 11:14:52 PM 876 Views
Not very much, but interesting none the less - 06/08/2011 11:38:36 PM 869 Views
Re: Natural selection - 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM 796 Views
Thanks a lot - 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM 941 Views
2 things - 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM 700 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM 920 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM 733 Views
My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM 764 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM 707 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM 861 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 07:02:27 PM 709 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 09:09:57 PM 818 Views

Reply to Message