Even if you can only measure it after the fact, that doesn't mean it cannot be "predicted or tested."
You can't KNOW, or ACCURATELY predict ANYTHING that has never been tested before, but you can make predictions, do tests, and study the results. This would apply to determining whether a new trait is beneficial for a population of organisms as much as it would to anything else in science.
You can't KNOW, or ACCURATELY predict ANYTHING that has never been tested before, but you can make predictions, do tests, and study the results. This would apply to determining whether a new trait is beneficial for a population of organisms as much as it would to anything else in science.
Natural selection
- 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM
1075 Views
selection for suitability
- 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM
721 Views
Thanks for your responce 
- 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM
838 Views
- 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM
838 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it:
- 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM
778 Views
Just a question
- 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM
766 Views
Yes it can
- 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM
640 Views
But how?
- 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM
837 Views
Re: Just a question
- 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM
859 Views
I'm not sure I understand you
- 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM
763 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies.
- 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM
781 Views
Then it is still a tautology
- 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM
791 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations.
- 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM
892 Views
Maybe...
- 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM
751 Views
I'm more inclined toward his logic, but possibly toward your conclusions.
- 09/08/2011 12:45:46 AM
823 Views
we can't really know ahead of time what makes a specific trait benefical in that environment
- 09/08/2011 06:16:02 PM
887 Views
As I understand it
- 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM
711 Views
Better...
- 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM
696 Views
Did you perhaps mean "beneficial in the environment" rather than "beneficial to the environment"?
- 06/08/2011 06:34:44 PM
821 Views
yes. I did not really phrase that very clearly. *NM*
- 09/08/2011 06:14:11 PM
328 Views
No biggy; from what Bram said, I underestimated how well you were understood anyway.
- 09/08/2011 06:45:16 PM
762 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that
- 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM
797 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify...
- 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM
815 Views
The questions go deeper
- 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM
813 Views
Re: The questions go deeper
- 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM
800 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question.
- 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM
819 Views
How many equation's has Moraine screwed up? 
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:45:36 PM
338 Views
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:45:36 PM
338 Views
100% I think Moriaine is a very beneficial trait that contributes a lot to the RAFO pool *NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:46:54 PM
360 Views
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:46:54 PM
360 Views
Re: Natural selection
- 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM
796 Views
Thanks a lot
- 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM
941 Views
2 things
- 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM
700 Views
Re: 2 things
- 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM
920 Views
Re: 2 things
- 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM
733 Views
My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM
764 Views
Re: My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM
707 Views
Re: My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM
861 Views