Active Users:407 Time:04/04/2025 07:11:09 AM
Natural selection Bramhodoulos Send a noteboard - 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM
Hey folks, I have a question about natural selection: what is it?

No, this is not another evolution vs. creation post (at least, that's not my intent), nor is it me proclaiming I don't believe in NS.
In fact the type of creationism I favor makes heavy use of natural selection to account for the variety within species or groups of species.

Recently however I've been reading another book and it discussed natural selection in a philosophical way, showing that there are multiple ways to define NS and all of them were unscientific.

I found that rather strange, since obviously we can see that some individuals or some species can live on while others go extinct. Since they are not actively selected by an outside intelligence (like man or God or aliens) it would be oke to say that "nature selects".

Now I will not repeat his arguments here, for that may put you in a frame of mind about how to define NS, rahter I'd like you guys to give me your best shot of defining NS and then I'll see if his arguments are still valid when applied to your definitions :)

One more thing about what I meant with "scientific", here I mean that it is (a theory or hypothesis that is) falsifiable (Popper).
Reply to message
Natural selection - 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM 1075 Views
selection for suitability - 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM 721 Views
Thanks for your responce - 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM 838 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it: - 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM 778 Views
Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM 766 Views
Yes it can - 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM 639 Views
But how? - 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM 837 Views
Okay, I think I see what you're saying - 08/08/2011 05:30:43 PM 653 Views
Close - 08/08/2011 05:41:46 PM 854 Views
Re: Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM 859 Views
I'm not sure I understand you - 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM 763 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies. - 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM 781 Views
Then it is still a tautology - 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM 791 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations. - 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM 892 Views
Maybe... - 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM 751 Views
As I understand it - 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM 711 Views
Better... - 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM 696 Views
Actually - 06/08/2011 10:13:51 PM 785 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 10:37:33 PM 924 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 11:38:52 PM 851 Views
Oeh - 07/08/2011 01:54:19 PM 700 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM 797 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 07:08:25 PM 798 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 07/08/2011 12:46:23 AM 792 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify... - 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM 815 Views
The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM 812 Views
Re: The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM 800 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question. - 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM 819 Views
TalkOrigins addresses this at length. - 06/08/2011 11:14:52 PM 876 Views
Not very much, but interesting none the less - 06/08/2011 11:38:36 PM 869 Views
Re: Natural selection - 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM 795 Views
Thanks a lot - 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM 941 Views
2 things - 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM 700 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM 920 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM 733 Views
My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM 764 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM 707 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM 861 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 07:02:27 PM 709 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 09:09:57 PM 818 Views

Reply to Message