S&P didn't demand cuts, they demanded fiscal responsibility.
Joel Send a noteboard - 06/08/2011 03:18:10 PM
S&P has been warning DC for months that unless significant cuts to our projected debt were accepted, the downgrade would happen. Obama resisted such cuts every step of the way and now has to suffer the consequences.
The buck stops with him.....that's the job he signed up for.
Congress must pass any legislation, and with a Republican House and Democratic Senate, only a bi-partisan bill would have any chance of passing, and we saw how well that worked this time.
Which includes tax hikes AS WELL AS spending cuts, which in turn is why they cited the GOPs refusal to even consider tax hikes as one reason for the downgrade:
"The political brinksmanship of recent months highlights what we see as America's governance and policymaking becoming less stable, less effective, and less predictable than what we previously believed.
Compared with previous projections, our revised base case scenario now assumes that the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts, due to expire by the end of 2012, remain in place. We have changed our assumption on this because the majority of Republicans in Congress continue to resist any measure that would raise revenues, a position we believe Congress reinforced by passing the [debt ceiling deal]. - Excerpt from Standard and Poors statement reducing America bond rating.
Compared with previous projections, our revised base case scenario now assumes that the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts, due to expire by the end of 2012, remain in place. We have changed our assumption on this because the majority of Republicans in Congress continue to resist any measure that would raise revenues, a position we believe Congress reinforced by passing the [debt ceiling deal]. - Excerpt from Standard and Poors statement reducing America bond rating.
Don't make the mistake Obama did of discussing this on the terms of those who caused the downgrade. Obama DID screw up: He gave the Republicans all their spoiled childish demands at the expense of the national economy, with finanical agencies and the public demanding tax hikes AND spending cuts to cut our debt.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
US Credit Rate Downgraded - Obama should resign.....
06/08/2011 04:12:48 AM
- 1331 Views
Que tonterías.
06/08/2011 04:23:49 AM
- 858 Views
Really?
06/08/2011 05:05:48 AM
- 914 Views
Leaders have to lead.....
06/08/2011 05:18:21 AM
- 735 Views
Cuts aren't up to him, though.
06/08/2011 05:37:50 AM
- 783 Views
Yeah, sure, the President has no say or control.....good grief..... *NM*
06/08/2011 06:13:49 AM
- 446 Views
S&P didn't demand cuts, they demanded fiscal responsibility.
06/08/2011 03:18:10 PM
- 1016 Views
and haters gotta hate..... *NM*
06/08/2011 05:49:25 AM
- 427 Views
I admit it, I hate what Obama is doing to our country..... *NM*
06/08/2011 06:12:39 AM
- 438 Views
you, it was the tea party republicans that caused this
06/08/2011 05:57:16 AM
- 863 Views
As ever your disinterest in facts seems to be central to your posting.
06/08/2011 11:34:20 AM
- 827 Views
Which would be less annoying if so much of Congress didn't suffer from the same delusions.
06/08/2011 03:48:04 PM
- 750 Views
Does Timmy G play sax like his brother Kenny? *NM*
06/08/2011 01:11:17 PM
- 425 Views
Fun fact - I dated in HS Kenny G's niece.....
06/08/2011 03:13:52 PM
- 729 Views
S&P specifically cited GOP refusal to raise taxes among their reasons.
06/08/2011 03:10:22 PM
- 898 Views
Of course one could just read the actual S&P report
06/08/2011 04:01:07 PM
- 898 Views
Sure.
06/08/2011 04:53:47 PM
- 907 Views
Right, ABC new's summary of the report is not the report
06/08/2011 07:02:46 PM
- 1199 Views
Link works, but I'm not sure why you think it refutes snoops assessment or mine.
06/08/2011 08:35:10 PM
- 997 Views
It doesn't refute it, it just isn't this simple distillation you're offering
06/08/2011 09:23:33 PM
- 828 Views
It's more than half a sentence; I quoted several paragraphs.
06/08/2011 09:56:31 PM
- 714 Views
Well yes, after I gave you the report, I think I'm pretty obviously refering to before that
06/08/2011 11:02:17 PM
- 724 Views
Before that I was referring to the paragraphs quoted in the ABC report.
07/08/2011 01:21:18 AM
- 1128 Views
not really
06/08/2011 10:15:32 PM
- 789 Views
"the mix of spending and revenue measures"
06/08/2011 10:23:06 PM
- 855 Views
So you read the statement that they take no posistion as they take the dem position?
07/08/2011 04:51:58 AM
- 859 Views
I read a "mix" to be a mix.
09/08/2011 12:14:35 AM
- 767 Views
So in other words you just ignore the actaull words and read it say what you want it to say *NM*
09/08/2011 02:07:57 PM
- 488 Views
A mix of something and nothing is impossible; one thing is one thing, not a mix.
09/08/2011 04:56:00 PM
- 948 Views
US politicians are too busy fighting over who gets to play the fiddle. *NM*
06/08/2011 05:53:32 PM
- 441 Views
would him resigning really help?
07/08/2011 10:24:00 AM
- 823 Views
not as long as he has the high functioning moron Joe Biden as VP.
08/08/2011 12:34:32 AM
- 810 Views
In reality, its Congress (BOTH parties) AND the President who are to blame.
08/08/2011 01:59:13 AM
- 830 Views
40% is not a small tax increase and a small spending cut
09/08/2011 04:20:28 AM
- 711 Views
Why are people making a deal about the debt ceiling increase?
09/08/2011 03:42:13 PM
- 747 Views
Because, when you get down to it, the debt ceilings very existence was always a political threat.
09/08/2011 05:02:12 PM
- 718 Views