Active Users:479 Time:26/11/2024 03:05:42 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
No, you are reaching. Joel Send a noteboard - 02/08/2011 12:39:24 PM
I'm not gonna criticize you on form because that's just sophistry in which I don't engage, but it does seem like a Freudian slip.

no it looks like I hit the space bar a second to early and spell checker doesn't check the subject. But hey it is all about perspective.

Like I said, it's not a reflection on your argument either way, I just found it ironic. I do have to say though, I wish you'd type a little more slowly 'cos I frequently find myself having to decipher what you mean. I know you've got other stuff going on so I haven't mentioned it in a while, but there's got to be a happy medium between your volume of typos and the embarrassing amount of time I spend online.
Maybe we should ask John Boehner....

I did he and he said that the republicans in the house have managed to pass to bills that would save us from defaulting while the other side continues to posture and offer nothing.

Cute. Bottom line remains that the only to get his own bill through the House was to make it a copy of the Tea Partys; nice "alternative", Mr. Speaker.

Step back from the rhetoric. The Tea party doesn't like his bill. I know that doesn't make a great bumper sticker but reality is stubborn that way.

The Tea Party likes his bill fine now that it the balanced budget amendment that makes it a copy of theirs; the Senate just didn't like it. The current question is whether the rest of House Republicans will like Reids bill now that it has ALSO has a balanced budget amendment that makes it little more than CC&B Mark III, and whether Pelosi can sell the SS and Medicare cuts if they don't. I suspect what Boehner will find is that the Tea Party is so committed to a balanced budget amendment, spending cuts and no tax hikes that they'll vote for it even if it includes defence cuts many of them regard as wasteful spending in the first place.

Why all the hysterics about a balance a balanced budget amendment?

Because it went from:

1) Tea Party notion the House Speaker rejected and the Senate Majority Leader ridiculed, to
2) Tea Party notion the House Speaker adopted to get them to pass his "alternative" bill, to
3) Tea Party notion the Senate Majority Leader also adopted to pass the final bill.

That's a pretty stunning Tea Party victory, but also a sign the lunatics are running the asylum.
If it is such a horrid thing and the country is so oppossed it will never go anywhere.

Exactly: A bill that simply raises the debt ceiling in exchange for a Constitutional Amendment the states won't ratify doesn't solve our budget problem. Again, not only did we punt, we took a safety to avoid punting out of our own end zone, which is a sorry way to lead a comeback. As to whether it would be horrid, we could theoretically end up caught between a new Constitutional Amendment and the 14th (which would incidentally mean the Republican Party made two mutually exclusive demands part of the US Constitution). We didn't raise the debt ceiling to cover new spending, but spending already "authorized by law"; a balanced budget amendment would simply give us a choice between which part of the Constitution to violate. As if our self created crisis weren't already bad enough. The REALLY important thing, of which we mustn't lose sight, is that we avoid a tax hike.
Is purely principle that you don't like the tea party so want them to fail no matter the cost? I am not even sure you know who or what the tea party even is. It seems to have become your blanket term for conservative you don't like. I think you may be spending to much time on nut jobs far left web pages again.

The Tea Party doesn't need my help to fail, clearly. And that "you spend too much time on far left web pages" crack is beyond lame at this point; you know full well it's BS, and if KNOWINGLY false accusations are your only defence for GOP radicalism that should tell you just how radical the Tea Party is.
as to the rest you really need to look at more polls. Republicans are doing pretty well in the Midwest and yes you can win the oval office without New England and the left coast. 2008 was an aberration not the new norm. Oh and you are on crack if you think 40% of the country is liberal and the tea party which had not even been formed yet sneered at Hatboy and flip fop the sailor man.

Yeah, Republicans are doing GREAT in the Mid-West; WI is about to recall half a dozen GOP state senators and probably their governor, while the Republican governor of OH (home of "Mr. Republican" Robert Taft) has an approval rating just under 35% less than a year after he took office. 2010 was an aberration, not the new norm, but if Republicans want to take it as a mandate they are welcome to do so with my blessing. I have no idea who "Hatboy and flip flop the sailorman" are, but right now Obama looks to be in the same place Bush was in '03: No one really likes him, but he's got charisma and the oppositions best choice to run against him is a guy who endorsed all the same policies. I mean, let's face it, Romneys whole professional life boils down to government subsidies to private industry and laws forcing people to buy insurance; instead of running against him, Obama should put him on the ticket.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 02/08/2011 at 12:41:44 PM
Reply to message
2nd Quarter GDP at 1.3% - 1st Quarter downgraded to 0.4% - trzaska2000 - 29/07/2011 02:31:07 PM 728 Views
...do all your posts have to be about evicting Obama out of the White House? *NM* Great Lord of Chaos - 29/07/2011 02:49:36 PM 198 Views
Not all, see the thread about the God Particle below..... trzaska2000 - 29/07/2011 02:57:09 PM 504 Views
wasn't that good, sorry *NM* Nolan - 29/07/2011 09:28:42 PM 271 Views
you know coming off as cheering that the economy it crap doesn't put you in a good light random thoughts - 29/07/2011 02:50:24 PM 490 Views
What exactly in my post is "cheering"..... trzaska2000 - 29/07/2011 02:56:00 PM 508 Views
well I guess the dancing banna is just your sig random thoughts - 29/07/2011 02:58:45 PM 457 Views
Yeah, the dancing banana can give that impression, understood trzaska2000 - 29/07/2011 03:03:45 PM 542 Views
Why does the Dancing Banana have a cape? *NM* Nolan - 29/07/2011 09:33:29 PM 371 Views
On a side note this could be a Quickpoll.. so post a few answers *NM* Nolan - 29/07/2011 09:40:54 PM 308 Views
my contibution, to keep the sun off it's back peel *NM* Nolan - 29/07/2011 09:50:24 PM 318 Views
Re: Why does the Dancing Banana have a cape? And be nice!!!! *NM* Nolan - 29/07/2011 09:51:49 PM 337 Views
I guess it is a super dancing banana! trzaska2000 - 30/07/2011 03:22:02 AM 427 Views
Fun Fun *NM* Nolan - 30/07/2011 08:00:52 PM 318 Views
when you find me and snoop agreeing on something you might want to look at it *NM* random thoughts - 29/07/2011 02:59:49 PM 203 Views
Saved me the trouble of responding, to boot. Joel - 29/07/2011 03:36:49 PM 582 Views
well any plan designed to break the control of the two parties random thoughts - 29/07/2011 03:40:15 PM 516 Views
Neither of the two major partys is integral to America nor vital to its survival. Joel - 29/07/2011 03:59:38 PM 699 Views
I agree but the control the rules and are not going to change the rules if it hurts that control random thoughts - 29/07/2011 04:45:09 PM 638 Views
Third Parties will never take off unless they get quality candidates regardless of voting system. Macharius - 29/07/2011 05:30:10 PM 518 Views
Also true, but that's just more reason to rescind their control. Joel - 30/07/2011 03:52:07 PM 588 Views
the tea party as not as far right as you like to belive random thoughts - 30/07/2011 04:38:40 PM 506 Views
Well, one of us is obviously wrong about that. Joel - 30/07/2011 05:22:14 PM 581 Views
thank god iti s me; random thoughts - 30/07/2011 06:12:24 PM 583 Views
I'm loving your latest typo. Joel - 30/07/2011 07:19:01 PM 595 Views
Re: I'm loving your latest typo. random thoughts - 31/07/2011 03:22:21 PM 558 Views
Re: I'm loving your latest typo. Joel - 01/08/2011 05:01:19 AM 800 Views
you are flailing random thoughts - 01/08/2011 02:52:57 PM 563 Views
No, you are reaching. Joel - 02/08/2011 12:39:24 PM 452 Views
"we both agree that Obama's COLOSSALLY failed at leadership" trzaska2000 - 29/07/2011 03:47:48 PM 488 Views
Some things aren't about hippies vs. fascists, and Americas well being should definitely qualify. Joel - 29/07/2011 03:51:03 PM 496 Views
Wow, the stick up your butt has its own stick up its butt..... trzaska2000 - 29/07/2011 09:09:20 PM 521 Views
Manners MR.!!! *NM* Nolan - 29/07/2011 09:23:38 PM 342 Views
Okay, okay, but that was a pretty funny reply! Joel gets too serious sometimes. *NM* trzaska2000 - 30/07/2011 03:23:30 AM 199 Views
It's all fun and games until the country goes bankrupt. Joel - 30/07/2011 05:23:29 PM 475 Views
The British economy is struggling fairly badly under the Tories snoopcester - 29/07/2011 02:54:51 PM 535 Views
I think you missed the latest update on that... Nebhead - 30/07/2011 03:10:27 PM 691 Views
Oh dear snoopcester - 30/07/2011 03:18:45 PM 464 Views
China Bored - 29/07/2011 05:27:46 PM 762 Views
Re: China Macharius - 29/07/2011 05:36:03 PM 497 Views
I was actually thinking about that this morning. nossy - 29/07/2011 05:52:08 PM 588 Views
They have enough markets in the rest of the developing world and at home. Legolas - 29/07/2011 06:23:13 PM 587 Views
They have us where they want us but don't dare pull the trigger. Joel - 30/07/2011 05:46:12 PM 618 Views
Another term for Obama and we might end up there! *NM* trzaska2000 - 29/07/2011 09:07:46 PM 307 Views
the country is going to shit in a handbasket. hooray! let's all dance a jig moondog - 30/07/2011 01:05:12 AM 485 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes