Idiot. He's done nothing but cave to the Republicans since elected, which is NOT what the people voted for (else they'd have elected McCain). This capitulation (The Nation is calling it what it is, despite scrambling to look for a way to say otherwise) means several things:
1) He's abandoned his stated commitment to debt reduction through spending cuts combined with tax hikes, despite overwhelming public support for just that. Think public healthcare option, a primary platform plank he completely abandoned on election just so he could claim to have passed a "healthcare bill".
2) Republicans have once again refused any concessions until Obama granted all of theirs. They have no reason to think they can't continue doing so (Obama's buckled every time) and every reason to think they should (reversing GOP policies that caused the recession could only vindicate him at their expense). He told them he was willing to sacrifice his presidency for his principles and still backed down; he has ZERO leverage with them now.
3) He's a lame duck in every sense of the word. We've already been told the economy won't be much improved by November of 2012, the deficit and thus our debt will continue to grow and Republicans know the "opposition" party President will do whatever they tell him, every time, because he always has.
Here's hoping there's a country left to save in 2016, and a president willing to not only state how to do it, but back it with action.
1) He's abandoned his stated commitment to debt reduction through spending cuts combined with tax hikes, despite overwhelming public support for just that. Think public healthcare option, a primary platform plank he completely abandoned on election just so he could claim to have passed a "healthcare bill".
2) Republicans have once again refused any concessions until Obama granted all of theirs. They have no reason to think they can't continue doing so (Obama's buckled every time) and every reason to think they should (reversing GOP policies that caused the recession could only vindicate him at their expense). He told them he was willing to sacrifice his presidency for his principles and still backed down; he has ZERO leverage with them now.
3) He's a lame duck in every sense of the word. We've already been told the economy won't be much improved by November of 2012, the deficit and thus our debt will continue to grow and Republicans know the "opposition" party President will do whatever they tell him, every time, because he always has.
Here's hoping there's a country left to save in 2016, and a president willing to not only state how to do it, but back it with action.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reid/Democrats cave, Republicans win debt ceiling debate -
25/07/2011 07:29:17 PM
- 1025 Views
Why must it always be us against them
25/07/2011 08:12:48 PM
- 536 Views
Two-party system = us vs. them
25/07/2011 09:00:31 PM
- 525 Views
fuck you
26/07/2011 03:17:04 AM
- 596 Views
HA! HA! - I think I broke moondog's mind.....
26/07/2011 04:09:59 AM
- 516 Views
it's not about support, it's about getting *some* of what you want
26/07/2011 06:31:26 AM
- 527 Views
I am only getting "some" of what I want.....
26/07/2011 03:01:28 PM
- 647 Views
when your position is intractable, don't be surprised when people refuse to work with you
26/07/2011 03:55:28 PM
- 515 Views
It generally isn't
25/07/2011 09:30:36 PM
- 559 Views
It formerly wasn't.
25/07/2011 10:22:47 PM
- 593 Views
That's mostly BS
26/07/2011 12:57:26 AM
- 643 Views
Boehner was onboard with Obamas initial deal but cited his caucus as the reason he backed out of it.
26/07/2011 01:39:06 AM
- 721 Views
I'm sorry, did I mention Boehner in my message somewhere? Or the deal?
26/07/2011 03:11:40 AM
- 542 Views
Re: I'm sorry, did I mention Boehner in my message somewhere? Or the deal?
29/07/2011 08:26:12 AM
- 678 Views
Is there some lack of understanding about 'tangent' maybe?
30/07/2011 04:57:15 AM
- 584 Views
Not at all; you stated exactly why I wasn't being tangential.
30/07/2011 12:47:08 PM
- 485 Views
You're making overtly contradictory statements now, so I think we're done
31/07/2011 01:57:37 AM
- 517 Views
It's not just about his reelection. Can you imagine having this circus again next year?
25/07/2011 09:16:17 PM
- 559 Views
or he is worried that with and election coming more dems will break ranks
25/07/2011 10:00:56 PM
- 529 Views
Yeah, pretty much.
25/07/2011 10:12:03 PM
- 732 Views
Reid didn't cave as much as you might think
25/07/2011 11:58:08 PM
- 516 Views
I agree with that.
25/07/2011 11:59:41 PM
- 542 Views
to bad we have a media more interested in hyping the drama than they are in cutting through BS
26/07/2011 01:42:39 AM
- 528 Views
we need a law like they have in canada that you can't lie during a newscast
26/07/2011 03:58:38 PM
- 529 Views
Yeah, but any tax hikes, and any Dem leverage, is gone now.
26/07/2011 01:51:04 AM
- 686 Views
the tax cuts are set to expire on their own, they don't need to vote to cancel them.
26/07/2011 02:04:58 PM
- 465 Views
Yes, but they voted to extend them last winter, which you insist was the Dems fault.
27/07/2011 03:30:33 AM
- 548 Views