I could pick apart the entire post that you sent based upon plenty of things...and catch you in plenty of moral arguements where you are basically advocating for complete anarchy as long as its regulated to one's body. But I'm not going to do that.
Instead, I'll focus on one little phrase which you've said here (and a variation of what you've said before).
<snip> disgusting and immoral; that doesn't mean they should be illegal </snip>
This phrase was used in this case in regards to prostitution and organ sales. In other contex, you've used something along these lines before....
I have a real difficult time not legislating things that are disgusting and immoral. Why? Because not having rules against it is tantamount to endorsement. No law against beastality, means society is cool with it. No law against murder, means society is cool with it.
Do you see where I'm going with this? We live in a society where freedom is the default setting. Without being expressly told not to do it, it is permissable. Much like when driving (in California at least)...I can do a U-turn at any intersection....unless it tells me that I can't. Society functions much the same way. I can do whatever I want...unless there's a rule against it.
Oh, and I know/realize/understand about the whole love cannot be coerced thing. But please try and keep a barrier between the aspects of loving God and loving our society. You cannot approach the two in the same way....as God is without sin. Society, as evidenced over and over, is rife with sin.
~Jeordam
Instead, I'll focus on one little phrase which you've said here (and a variation of what you've said before).
<snip> disgusting and immoral; that doesn't mean they should be illegal </snip>
This phrase was used in this case in regards to prostitution and organ sales. In other contex, you've used something along these lines before....
I have a real difficult time not legislating things that are disgusting and immoral. Why? Because not having rules against it is tantamount to endorsement. No law against beastality, means society is cool with it. No law against murder, means society is cool with it.
Do you see where I'm going with this? We live in a society where freedom is the default setting. Without being expressly told not to do it, it is permissable. Much like when driving (in California at least)...I can do a U-turn at any intersection....unless it tells me that I can't. Society functions much the same way. I can do whatever I want...unless there's a rule against it.
Oh, and I know/realize/understand about the whole love cannot be coerced thing. But please try and keep a barrier between the aspects of loving God and loving our society. You cannot approach the two in the same way....as God is without sin. Society, as evidenced over and over, is rife with sin.
~Jeordam
ex-Admin at wotmania (all things wot & art galleries)
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
You can't make this stuff up: Helmet law protester dies in crash
05/07/2011 08:47:14 PM
- 873 Views
Kinda undermines his protest *NM*
05/07/2011 09:01:50 PM
- 256 Views
How so? He wasn't demanding the right to survive crashes when only a helmet makes that possible.
05/07/2011 11:06:44 PM
- 544 Views
New York feels that people should have to wear helmets for their own safety
05/07/2011 11:20:36 PM
- 518 Views
He felt his own safety was his own concern.
06/07/2011 12:07:05 AM
- 457 Views
Who do you think would have ended up paying for his care for the rest of his life if the accident
06/07/2011 01:08:49 AM
- 602 Views
The same people who pay for everyone else whose actions render them vegetables.
06/07/2011 01:50:20 AM
- 712 Views
Maybe a more effective argument you could use against me would be pointing out
06/07/2011 02:33:21 AM
- 506 Views
what a fricking idiot
05/07/2011 10:02:17 PM
- 685 Views
That's your opinion to which you're entitled.
05/07/2011 11:19:36 PM
- 927 Views
Anarchy, baby! *NM*
06/07/2011 12:58:23 AM
- 464 Views
Sorry, as an advocate of civil rights (which especially includes minorities) I oppose anarchy.
06/07/2011 01:18:19 AM
- 584 Views
The public's nose is on the line here too.
06/07/2011 01:47:08 AM
- 644 Views
So my increased ease of hearing/seeing vehicles and other hazards isn't worth $1200.
06/07/2011 02:25:53 AM
- 648 Views
I understand the pov, I had a BF who felt that same way. It's still much like childish defiance.
06/07/2011 01:26:15 AM
- 747 Views
In part it's a matter of principle, but if we really want to analyze it there's some deeper validity
06/07/2011 02:13:05 AM
- 613 Views
you keep spreading falsehoods, stop it please
06/07/2011 02:49:01 AM
- 785 Views
Sounds like your real argument is with the other bikers; I'm just reiterating their arguments.
06/07/2011 03:38:39 AM
- 713 Views
Uh Joel...
06/07/2011 03:38:24 AM
- 542 Views
Agreed, having others in the car does make a difference.
06/07/2011 03:47:53 AM
- 626 Views
Hence why your "I wouldn't wear a seatbelt in the back seat" comment didn't make a lot of sense
06/07/2011 07:38:50 PM
- 588 Views
Depends on whether the driver, rather than the law, is the one insisting.
06/07/2011 08:06:24 PM
- 458 Views
You'd place your own comfort over other people's safety?
06/07/2011 11:37:00 PM
- 494 Views
It's more a comfort issue than anything else; it's not solely one.
06/07/2011 11:56:28 PM
- 973 Views
Hold the phone here...
06/07/2011 07:49:10 PM
- 872 Views
+1 *NM*
06/07/2011 08:42:14 PM
- 322 Views
You agree with him that the abortion debate is about a mothers convenience versus the babys life?
06/07/2011 10:48:52 PM
- 612 Views
im not bringing abortion into this, its a separate issue *NM*
06/07/2011 10:56:17 PM
- 308 Views
It's really not.
07/07/2011 12:20:10 AM
- 644 Views
i'm really not
07/07/2011 03:34:23 PM
- 717 Views
Fine as far as it goes, but public/private only matters to the extent others are affected.
09/07/2011 11:15:33 AM
- 679 Views
Holding the phone here might be good, yes....
06/07/2011 10:33:46 PM
- 701 Views
See...that's the difference between you and me
06/07/2011 10:56:53 PM
- 803 Views
Apparently so; "completely anarchy as long as its regulated to one's body" sounds nonsensical to me.
06/07/2011 11:44:50 PM
- 806 Views
I'm with Joel. I always buckle up/helmet up, but I think such laws are asinine
06/07/2011 02:30:04 AM
- 470 Views
why not just ban motorcycles all together, they are much more dangerous than cars
06/07/2011 05:39:51 PM
- 482 Views
Helmets help save lives. 'Onest.
07/07/2011 04:40:42 PM
- 646 Views
So do not smoking, eating right and regular exercise, but we haven't made them mandatory.
09/07/2011 11:04:58 AM
- 654 Views