Active Users:1197 Time:23/11/2024 03:38:15 AM
Are you sure about this? Camilla Send a noteboard - 30/06/2011 04:47:57 PM
Wouldn't that mean that a divorced protestant could get married in a Catholic church, or even more importantly: a protestantly married person could become a bigamist?
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
Reply to message
New York Senate approves same-sex marriage - 25/06/2011 03:47:43 AM 1157 Views
Good. *NM* - 25/06/2011 07:40:52 AM 378 Views
Re: Federalism is so fucking slow. *NM* - 25/06/2011 02:47:11 PM 213 Views
I'm actually not opposed to this. - 25/06/2011 03:48:32 PM 546 Views
Makes sense to me. - 25/06/2011 04:00:07 PM 703 Views
I'm not sure why there was even any need for such explicit protection. - 25/06/2011 04:04:47 PM 511 Views
There are two reasons, depending on ones position on the issue. - 25/06/2011 06:04:27 PM 563 Views
Meh, you never know. - 26/06/2011 12:58:37 AM 655 Views
so in your only Catholics are really married? - 26/06/2011 12:04:07 AM 515 Views
Church Doctrine. - 26/06/2011 12:57:39 AM 641 Views
That is simply not true - 26/06/2011 08:20:59 AM 564 Views
Yes it is. - 26/06/2011 05:14:29 PM 592 Views
That's patently wrong in that Orthodox weddings are explicitly recognized by the Church. - 26/06/2011 02:42:00 PM 535 Views
Yeah okay... - 26/06/2011 05:16:05 PM 568 Views
Are you sure about this? - 30/06/2011 04:47:57 PM 424 Views
Dragonsoul is wrong - 01/07/2011 09:21:43 AM 569 Views
Glad to hear it. *NM* - 25/06/2011 04:05:15 PM 211 Views
Seems fine to me - 25/06/2011 05:44:30 PM 501 Views
Voting on civil rights constitutes tyranny of the majority, not legitimate democracy. - 25/06/2011 09:37:28 PM 638 Views
Direct democracy is the only true democracy. *NM* - 26/06/2011 01:01:26 AM 222 Views
Sometimes it is grand not being a True Scottsman *NM* - 26/06/2011 08:21:49 AM 209 Views
Re: Voting on civil rights constitutes tyranny of the majority, not legitimate democracy. - 26/06/2011 03:11:06 AM 585 Views
Good luck telling that to the deeply religious right. - 26/06/2011 03:20:04 AM 489 Views
I am a deeply religious member of the right, and I tell them that all the time *NM* - 26/06/2011 03:30:14 AM 222 Views
Then you're a rare person. *NM* - 26/06/2011 03:36:11 AM 222 Views
After a number of years of gay marriage - 26/06/2011 06:57:07 AM 471 Views
That's more or less true of virtually everything, not a great example - 26/06/2011 07:09:03 AM 507 Views
People shouldn't turn their own religion and/or opinion into law - 28/06/2011 07:33:48 PM 502 Views
I don't recall mentioning religion beyond confirming that I was religious - 28/06/2011 08:22:51 PM 540 Views
I admit I wasn't replying to you directly - 29/06/2011 07:20:10 AM 497 Views
I think you should give this subject a bit more thought - 29/06/2011 02:16:04 PM 538 Views
I'll address the bulk of this later - 29/06/2011 07:58:48 PM 422 Views
Believing things without strong supporting evidence is not rational. - 30/06/2011 12:11:33 AM 603 Views
Requiring different degrees of proof for things isn't particularly rational - 30/06/2011 01:14:44 PM 673 Views
I require the same standard of evidence to be confident in anything. - 30/06/2011 07:43:51 PM 1048 Views
Re: I require the same standard of evidence to be confident in anything. - 30/06/2011 08:59:00 PM 683 Views
Re: I require the same standard of evidence to be confident in anything. - 30/06/2011 09:47:30 PM 947 Views
We're gonna have to pick this up another time - 01/07/2011 04:37:25 AM 512 Views
No, I used the word irrational to mean that it's not rational. - 30/06/2011 09:12:19 PM 526 Views
Fair Enough - 01/07/2011 04:32:44 AM 577 Views
Btw, in case you were wondering, I do like you - 01/07/2011 02:17:42 PM 576 Views
Empire State Building was lit up in rainbow colors, looked cool *NM* - 25/06/2011 08:21:03 PM 230 Views
Good. *NM* - 25/06/2011 11:41:30 PM 202 Views
So, fifth time is a charm? - 26/06/2011 06:38:26 AM 619 Views

Reply to Message