Voting on civil rights constitutes tyranny of the majority, not legitimate democracy.
Dreaded Anomaly Send a noteboard - 25/06/2011 09:37:28 PM
Personally I'd rather states put it to a direct vote on the ballot, keeps it clean from any legislative antics and makes it harder for the legislature to repeal it or pass it themselves if it fails since the electorate makes their will known, but so long as it's not the courts doing it and so long as it left churches and such the freedom not perform the ceremonies I've got no issue with it.
And if you're not convinced by the philosophical aspects, you should be by the successful fear- and misinformation-based campaigns run against gay marriage nationwide wherever it's been up for popular vote.
New York Senate approves same-sex marriage
25/06/2011 03:47:43 AM
- 1157 Views
I'm actually not opposed to this.
25/06/2011 03:48:32 PM
- 546 Views
I'm not sure why there was even any need for such explicit protection.
25/06/2011 04:04:47 PM
- 511 Views
so in your only Catholics are really married?
26/06/2011 12:04:07 AM
- 514 Views
Church Doctrine.
26/06/2011 12:57:39 AM
- 640 Views
That's patently wrong in that Orthodox weddings are explicitly recognized by the Church.
26/06/2011 02:42:00 PM
- 534 Views
Yeah okay...
26/06/2011 05:16:05 PM
- 567 Views
They are outside of the authority of Rome, and have, on occasion, excommunicated Popes.
27/06/2011 05:03:31 PM
- 539 Views
Seems fine to me
25/06/2011 05:44:30 PM
- 501 Views
Voting on civil rights constitutes tyranny of the majority, not legitimate democracy.
25/06/2011 09:37:28 PM
- 638 Views
Re: Voting on civil rights constitutes tyranny of the majority, not legitimate democracy.
26/06/2011 03:11:06 AM
- 585 Views
Good luck telling that to the deeply religious right.
26/06/2011 03:20:04 AM
- 489 Views
I am a deeply religious member of the right, and I tell them that all the time *NM*
26/06/2011 03:30:14 AM
- 222 Views
After a number of years of gay marriage
26/06/2011 06:57:07 AM
- 471 Views
That's more or less true of virtually everything, not a great example
26/06/2011 07:09:03 AM
- 507 Views
People shouldn't turn their own religion and/or opinion into law
28/06/2011 07:33:48 PM
- 502 Views
I don't recall mentioning religion beyond confirming that I was religious
28/06/2011 08:22:51 PM
- 540 Views
I admit I wasn't replying to you directly
29/06/2011 07:20:10 AM
- 496 Views
I think you should give this subject a bit more thought
29/06/2011 02:16:04 PM
- 538 Views
Believing things without strong supporting evidence is not rational.
30/06/2011 12:11:33 AM
- 603 Views
Requiring different degrees of proof for things isn't particularly rational
30/06/2011 01:14:44 PM
- 673 Views
I require the same standard of evidence to be confident in anything.
30/06/2011 07:43:51 PM
- 1047 Views
Re: I require the same standard of evidence to be confident in anything.
30/06/2011 08:59:00 PM
- 683 Views
Re: I require the same standard of evidence to be confident in anything.
30/06/2011 09:47:30 PM
- 947 Views
No, I used the word irrational to mean that it's not rational.
30/06/2011 09:12:19 PM
- 526 Views
Re: Voting on civil rights constitutes tyranny of the majority, not legitimate democracy.
26/06/2011 10:38:56 PM
- 673 Views
I think you should give your fellow citizens a bit more trust and respect
27/06/2011 05:41:52 PM
- 471 Views
My expectations are guided by psychology and history.
28/06/2011 07:08:06 PM
- 577 Views
That's good to know, most of us do that, though we usually just call it common sense and experience
28/06/2011 08:55:23 PM
- 622 Views
No, most people don't do that. Reasoning from cognitive biases and anecdotes is much more common.
30/06/2011 12:18:40 AM
- 529 Views
Empire State Building was lit up in rainbow colors, looked cool *NM*
25/06/2011 08:21:03 PM
- 230 Views
I approved that years ago. They are way behind. Granted, I have no authority over anyone...
26/06/2011 12:22:33 AM
- 408 Views
The real issue is going to be when the Supreme Court rules on the full faith and credit clause.
26/06/2011 02:43:23 PM
- 514 Views