Active Users:1195 Time:23/11/2024 03:50:54 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
There are two reasons, depending on ones position on the issue. Joel Send a noteboard - 25/06/2011 06:04:27 PM
Considering they protected the Church from being forced to perform gay marriages against it's will, and I don't recognize any marriage performed outside the Catholic Church anyway, this really doesn't change anything for me.

As far as I'm aware, attempts to force the Catholic Church or any other Church to perform marriages against its will - of divorced people, for instance - have never been successful before, so why would they be successful now?

Many religious opponents of gay civil marriage insist that it WOULD force churches to perform gay marriages, so explicitly preventing that in the legislation either addresses their concerns (if you agree with them) or robs them of a contrived objection (if you disagree with them). Also (and once again) it explicitly establishes the distinction between sacramental and legal marriage that is so often poorly (or un)recognized in the US.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
New York Senate approves same-sex marriage Dominic - 25/06/2011 03:47:43 AM 1157 Views
Good. *NM* Camilla - 25/06/2011 07:40:52 AM 378 Views
Re: Federalism is so fucking slow. *NM* Gaps - 25/06/2011 02:47:11 PM 213 Views
I'm actually not opposed to this. Dragonsoul - 25/06/2011 03:48:32 PM 546 Views
Makes sense to me. Joel - 25/06/2011 04:00:07 PM 704 Views
I'm not sure why there was even any need for such explicit protection. Legolas - 25/06/2011 04:04:47 PM 511 Views
There are two reasons, depending on ones position on the issue. Joel - 25/06/2011 06:04:27 PM 564 Views
Meh, you never know. Dragonsoul - 26/06/2011 12:58:37 AM 655 Views
so in your only Catholics are really married? random thoughts - 26/06/2011 12:04:07 AM 515 Views
Church Doctrine. Dragonsoul - 26/06/2011 12:57:39 AM 641 Views
That is simply not true Roland00 - 26/06/2011 08:20:59 AM 564 Views
Yes it is. Dragonsoul - 26/06/2011 05:14:29 PM 592 Views
That's patently wrong in that Orthodox weddings are explicitly recognized by the Church. Tom - 26/06/2011 02:42:00 PM 536 Views
Yeah okay... Dragonsoul - 26/06/2011 05:16:05 PM 569 Views
They are outside of the authority of Rome, and have, on occasion, excommunicated Popes. Dannymac - 27/06/2011 05:03:31 PM 539 Views
Are you sure about this? Camilla - 30/06/2011 04:47:57 PM 425 Views
Dragonsoul is wrong Roland00 - 01/07/2011 09:21:43 AM 570 Views
Glad to hear it. *NM* Legolas - 25/06/2011 04:05:15 PM 211 Views
Seems fine to me Isaac - 25/06/2011 05:44:30 PM 501 Views
Voting on civil rights constitutes tyranny of the majority, not legitimate democracy. Dreaded Anomaly - 25/06/2011 09:37:28 PM 639 Views
Direct democracy is the only true democracy. *NM* Dragonsoul - 26/06/2011 01:01:26 AM 222 Views
Sometimes it is grand not being a True Scottsman *NM* Roland00 - 26/06/2011 08:21:49 AM 209 Views
Re: Voting on civil rights constitutes tyranny of the majority, not legitimate democracy. Isaac - 26/06/2011 03:11:06 AM 585 Views
Good luck telling that to the deeply religious right. Great Lord of Chaos - 26/06/2011 03:20:04 AM 489 Views
I am a deeply religious member of the right, and I tell them that all the time *NM* Isaac - 26/06/2011 03:30:14 AM 222 Views
Then you're a rare person. *NM* Great Lord of Chaos - 26/06/2011 03:36:11 AM 222 Views
After a number of years of gay marriage Helene - 26/06/2011 06:57:07 AM 472 Views
That's more or less true of virtually everything, not a great example Isaac - 26/06/2011 07:09:03 AM 507 Views
People shouldn't turn their own religion and/or opinion into law Helene - 28/06/2011 07:33:48 PM 503 Views
I don't recall mentioning religion beyond confirming that I was religious Isaac - 28/06/2011 08:22:51 PM 541 Views
I admit I wasn't replying to you directly Helene - 29/06/2011 07:20:10 AM 497 Views
I think you should give this subject a bit more thought Isaac - 29/06/2011 02:16:04 PM 540 Views
I'll address the bulk of this later Helene - 29/06/2011 07:58:48 PM 422 Views
Believing things without strong supporting evidence is not rational. Dreaded Anomaly - 30/06/2011 12:11:33 AM 603 Views
Requiring different degrees of proof for things isn't particularly rational Isaac - 30/06/2011 01:14:44 PM 674 Views
I require the same standard of evidence to be confident in anything. Dreaded Anomaly - 30/06/2011 07:43:51 PM 1048 Views
Re: I require the same standard of evidence to be confident in anything. Isaac - 30/06/2011 08:59:00 PM 684 Views
Re: I require the same standard of evidence to be confident in anything. Dreaded Anomaly - 30/06/2011 09:47:30 PM 947 Views
We're gonna have to pick this up another time Isaac - 01/07/2011 04:37:25 AM 512 Views
No, I used the word irrational to mean that it's not rational. Helene - 30/06/2011 09:12:19 PM 526 Views
Fair Enough Isaac - 01/07/2011 04:32:44 AM 577 Views
Btw, in case you were wondering, I do like you Helene - 01/07/2011 02:17:42 PM 577 Views
Re: Voting on civil rights constitutes tyranny of the majority, not legitimate democracy. Dreaded Anomaly - 26/06/2011 10:38:56 PM 673 Views
I think you should give your fellow citizens a bit more trust and respect Isaac - 27/06/2011 05:41:52 PM 472 Views
I'm all for occasionally forcing stuff down people's throats... LadyLorraine - 28/06/2011 11:44:12 AM 465 Views
My expectations are guided by psychology and history. Dreaded Anomaly - 28/06/2011 07:08:06 PM 578 Views
That's good to know, most of us do that, though we usually just call it common sense and experience Isaac - 28/06/2011 08:55:23 PM 623 Views
No, most people don't do that. Reasoning from cognitive biases and anecdotes is much more common. Dreaded Anomaly - 30/06/2011 12:18:40 AM 529 Views
Perhaps, you seem to be claiming not do that yourself though Isaac - 30/06/2011 01:40:57 PM 622 Views
Empire State Building was lit up in rainbow colors, looked cool *NM* beetnemesis - 25/06/2011 08:21:03 PM 230 Views
Good. *NM* ironclad - 25/06/2011 11:41:30 PM 202 Views
I approved that years ago. They are way behind. Granted, I have no authority over anyone... TaskmasterJack - 26/06/2011 12:22:33 AM 410 Views
So, fifth time is a charm? everynametaken - 26/06/2011 06:38:26 AM 620 Views
The real issue is going to be when the Supreme Court rules on the full faith and credit clause. Tom - 26/06/2011 02:43:23 PM 515 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes