Re: My point is that it's so far removed from the original material
everynametaken Send a noteboard - 19/06/2011 09:41:15 AM
why spaz out about it? If you want to talk specifically about shit, how about we think about all the manure used as fertilizer, or to make fertilizer? Or all the shit animals end up covering themselves in, even in wild environments?
Oh sure, they're all CLEANED...but it sounds like this "poop meat" doesn't have any more poop in it than those items. It's been so far chemically removed from poop, that it's...well...not poop!! How is cleaning some how more wholesome than chemical extraction and modification?
It doesn't matter, the idea of eating feces is psychologically different than a secondary exposure to feces such as fertilizer. Most consumers never see manure used as the fertilizer in the fields or the animals they are eating stepping and laying in it. It's a bit "out of sight, out of mind". The idea of eating it and knowing what it is is simply repulsive and would be to most everybody. This is an effect in psychology that has been very well documented. You can take something normally yummy like chocolate and shape into a big turd or a cockroach and most people will freeze up and not eat it even though they know it is yummy chocolate. There is a minority that seem to be able to overcome the effect but not many. maybe you are one.
I can understand hesitance to eat it due to the psychological barrier, but outright refusal, even in the face of starvation...
Well, it's something someone who's never starved before would say.
This is quite presumptuous. You don't know how hungry I have been in the past or whether I have ever went without food (I have). I can assure you that in the past when I did go without food and was extremely hungry that I would have not have eaten this.
But wine was the great assassin of both tradition and propriety...
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
I guess you can have your shit and eat it too...
- 18/06/2011 06:42:25 AM
781 Views
That's certainly interesting. *NM*
- 18/06/2011 06:44:27 AM
193 Views
Define "interesting" *NM*
- 18/06/2011 06:48:03 AM
199 Views
"Arousing curiosity or interest; holding or catching the attention" *NM*
- 18/06/2011 09:23:14 AM
181 Views
*NM*
Oh...My...God... 
- 18/06/2011 07:14:54 AM
506 Views
- 18/06/2011 07:14:54 AM
506 Views
*snort* it's not like it resembles feces in any way by the time they're done with it.
- 18/06/2011 09:27:33 AM
487 Views
Re: *snort* it's not like it resembles feces in any way by the time they're done with it.
- 18/06/2011 02:39:03 PM
474 Views
My point is that it's so far removed from the original material
- 18/06/2011 10:11:48 PM
382 Views
Re: My point is that it's so far removed from the original material
- 19/06/2011 09:41:15 AM
383 Views
Except it isn't feces. It's as much feces as an apple is dirt. *NM*
- 19/06/2011 07:04:06 PM
190 Views
Except psychologically it doesn't matter. *NM*
- 19/06/2011 09:59:49 PM
184 Views
Except that's bullshit. Once you explain to people what is going on, it's no longer a problem.
- 20/06/2011 03:58:04 AM
403 Views
I see the point you're trying to make and I understand where you're coming from
- 20/06/2011 12:27:14 AM
452 Views
That actually sounds really cool.
- 18/06/2011 07:31:30 AM
459 Views
it really could, particularly if they made it more efficient and could use multiple species of feces
- 18/06/2011 09:30:26 AM
460 Views
Once I got over the visceral yuck reaction, I saw nothing wrong with it.
- 18/06/2011 02:39:33 PM
397 Views
So this is our backup plan when shit hits the fan! *NM*
- 19/06/2011 07:18:01 PM
240 Views
*NM*
As long as regular meat is still available for sale, I don't mind
- 20/06/2011 06:34:42 AM
455 Views