Active Users:1185 Time:23/11/2024 03:54:30 AM
I think people here are missing the point. Variant Send a noteboard - 15/06/2011 10:14:09 PM
The Obama administration is no better nor worse than preceding administrations when it comes to offering plum governmental posts to big money donors. The problem is the campaign finance system itself is broken. The amount of money needed to get elected to any national office is staggering. At no time in American history has money been more important to running a successful campaign — especially for the White House.

Once elected, officeholders feel beholden to the donors they needed to get there. And with good reason — without them they don’t get elected. Obama and McCain combined to raise more than $1.1 billion in 2008. The two general election candidates may surpass $2 billion in 2012. And much of that money will come from big money donors and bundlers, not every day folk writing $25 checks. Until the system is fixed — really fixed — big donors will continue reap the benefits of their fundraising prowess. It’s just the way it is.
Reply to message
Top Barack Obama donors net government jobs - - 15/06/2011 08:35:39 PM 503 Views
yes but he gives such good speech - 15/06/2011 09:53:59 PM 338 Views
There *is* a reason why people think those ultra-expensive campaigns are bad, you know. - 15/06/2011 10:08:42 PM 346 Views
The problem is it is so hard to limit spending - 15/06/2011 10:55:57 PM 389 Views
I think people here are missing the point. - 15/06/2011 10:14:09 PM 456 Views
yes but Obama was the one who refused the matching federal funds - 15/06/2011 10:47:12 PM 367 Views
Indeed, but there's more to it then that in regards to 2008 - 15/06/2011 11:36:08 PM 504 Views
Go back 8 years, and you can say the exact same thing for GWB. - 16/06/2011 02:22:33 PM 347 Views
So Obama is the same as Bush? - 16/06/2011 02:49:46 PM 363 Views
Ultimately, yes. - 16/06/2011 04:21:51 PM 411 Views

Reply to Message