Re: They should, IMHO, but the difficulty of definitively saying is why Limbo was created.
Camilla Send a noteboard - 11/06/2011 11:53:53 AM
It's pretty widely held, though, that in order to qualify for salvation one must first be baptized. It kind of gets you in the door, so to speak.
And baptism does involve a confession and repentance of sin.
Anyway, I'm pretty sure they gave up on Limbo a while ago.
Babies automatically qualify for salvation?
Accountability is generally accepted to be conditional on awareness and consent, and infants are capable of neither. I also like pointing to the Israelites forty years in the wilderness: The biblical basis is that, because the Israelites refused to enter Canaan when spies reported the natives apparent military supremacy, God decreed that none of them would EVER be allowed to enter, but would instead wander the wilderness until everyone above age twenty had died. What's interesting about that is that it means the Bible states God held the entire Israelite nation responsible for doubting Him and forbade them to ever enter Canaan BUT explicitly excused everyone under the age of consent. In essence, minors got a free pass. It could be argued that was because they had no say in whether to invade (notwithstanding the fact many of them would have been expected to participate), but I trust you see why I consider the incident a kind of precedent, or at least illustration of a principle.
How does that work together with original sin?
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
A question on baptism
10/06/2011 09:21:44 AM
- 900 Views
To my knowledge, baptism does not stem from the Resurrection.
10/06/2011 11:01:17 AM
- 656 Views
What I meant
10/06/2011 11:03:08 AM
- 499 Views
I don't follow.
10/06/2011 11:08:07 AM
- 470 Views
Re: I don't follow.
10/06/2011 11:10:40 AM
- 560 Views
I don't keep up with RC theology much.
10/06/2011 11:15:52 AM
- 454 Views
Re: I don't keep up with RC theology much.
10/06/2011 11:17:53 AM
- 457 Views
They should, IMHO, but the difficulty of definitively saying is why Limbo was created.
11/06/2011 10:39:26 AM
- 541 Views
Re: They should, IMHO, but the difficulty of definitively saying is why Limbo was created.
11/06/2011 11:53:53 AM
- 485 Views
You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
10/06/2011 11:50:53 AM
- 490 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
10/06/2011 11:52:27 AM
- 439 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
10/06/2011 11:55:01 AM
- 491 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
10/06/2011 11:58:36 AM
- 465 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
10/06/2011 12:16:46 PM
- 608 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
10/06/2011 12:19:16 PM
- 465 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
10/06/2011 12:25:08 PM
- 669 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
10/06/2011 12:26:30 PM
- 666 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
10/06/2011 12:28:45 PM
- 472 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
10/06/2011 12:29:43 PM
- 500 Views
Circumcision remains common among Christians mostly for symbolic reasons as well.
11/06/2011 10:48:48 AM
- 545 Views
Hm, I don't know. I don't think I know any non-Jews who are circumsized that see it as a symbol
11/06/2011 04:44:02 PM
- 622 Views
I took a holy dip into the Ganges
10/06/2011 11:48:26 AM
- 561 Views
Early Christians and Jews were obsessed with purity
10/06/2011 12:56:58 PM
- 596 Views
Oh, I know about the historical/academic/anthropological reason
10/06/2011 01:04:43 PM
- 534 Views
A first responce
10/06/2011 02:09:32 PM
- 659 Views
Do you want a theological answer or a historical one?
10/06/2011 03:16:44 PM
- 629 Views
The theological. I already had a fairly good idea of the historical
10/06/2011 03:18:51 PM
- 502 Views
My favorite fact about baptism is that is REQUIRES water... but it can be ANY water
10/06/2011 04:31:12 PM
- 594 Views
That is absurd.
10/06/2011 08:37:13 PM
- 687 Views
It is absurd
10/06/2011 08:56:19 PM
- 500 Views
When your post is eviscerated, resorting to "HURR RELIGION IS DUMB" isn't a winning move.
10/06/2011 10:00:39 PM
- 617 Views
Psh.You can dress it up with spiritualism and semantics, but the concept boils down to "magic water"
11/06/2011 03:56:03 AM
- 443 Views
The point is that it's a symbol.
11/06/2011 04:45:19 AM
- 470 Views
I have no problem with water as a symbol
11/06/2011 04:59:52 AM
- 541 Views
You are totally missing the point.
11/06/2011 02:46:08 PM
- 623 Views
Which again, is something that sounds nice and spiritual, but doesn't actually make any sense
11/06/2011 03:46:51 PM
- 588 Views
your problem is you're trying to apply objective logic to religion
11/06/2011 04:13:01 PM
- 843 Views
I'm not, exactly. Religion has internal logic. For example, certain things are "unclean"
11/06/2011 04:40:33 PM
- 489 Views
Beliefs about holy water are internally logical.
11/06/2011 07:36:08 PM
- 531 Views
Shrug. It was on topic.
11/06/2011 08:06:16 PM
- 812 Views
The more I read of your posts, the more I think you fundamentally misunderstand religious symbolism. *NM*
11/06/2011 10:51:17 PM
- 209 Views
Let me clarify: your statements are absurd.
10/06/2011 10:14:06 PM
- 508 Views
Check my response to Ghav for elaboration, but basically, your argument doesn't hold
11/06/2011 04:00:18 AM
- 489 Views
You went from saying spit was good to saying "clean water".
12/06/2011 02:04:26 AM
- 433 Views
I'm completely consistent. I was just staying away from extremes for conversation's sake.
12/06/2011 09:02:02 AM
- 470 Views
No one from a respectable faith thinks of holy water as "magic water". Period. *NM*
13/06/2011 04:56:53 AM
- 196 Views
All I know, Is a Lutheran Pastor told me, b/c i was not baptised I was going to hell, and had *NM*
11/06/2011 03:44:38 PM
- 187 Views
I never thought of it in that way, that is why I like this site *NM*
12/06/2011 04:26:40 PM
- 229 Views