Check my response to Ghav for elaboration, but basically, your argument doesn't hold
beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 11/06/2011 04:00:18 AM
No one questioned God's authority or power when they were setting forth the procedure for baptism. It's about making sure the individuals involved are in the right state of mind and spirit. Taking a shit in a baptismal font prior to performing a baptism or spitting on a child's forehead are clear and overt signs that an individual is NOT in the proper state of spiritual receptiveness. Why this needs explaining is beyond me.
If it's only about being in the right frame of mind, than using ANY clean water would be enough. My problem is that the idea of "holy" water means that it's different from regular water, which means it has properties regular water does not have. Can only holy water wash away sin? Or maybe holy water is just better at it than regular water, and a baby baptized in it is now twice as reborn in God? If you cross yourself after dipping your fingers in holy water, does that make God more likely to protect your from being hit by a bus than someone who just crossed herself with regular water?
Obviously I'm being facetious, but the point still stands. What is the difference between "holy" water and "normal" water?
I amuse myself.
A question on baptism
- 10/06/2011 09:21:44 AM
900 Views
To my knowledge, baptism does not stem from the Resurrection.
- 10/06/2011 11:01:17 AM
656 Views
What I meant
- 10/06/2011 11:03:08 AM
498 Views
I don't follow.
- 10/06/2011 11:08:07 AM
470 Views
Re: I don't follow.
- 10/06/2011 11:10:40 AM
559 Views
I don't keep up with RC theology much.
- 10/06/2011 11:15:52 AM
454 Views
Re: I don't keep up with RC theology much.
- 10/06/2011 11:17:53 AM
457 Views
They should, IMHO, but the difficulty of definitively saying is why Limbo was created.
- 11/06/2011 10:39:26 AM
541 Views
Re: They should, IMHO, but the difficulty of definitively saying is why Limbo was created.
- 11/06/2011 11:53:53 AM
484 Views
You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
- 10/06/2011 11:50:53 AM
490 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
- 10/06/2011 11:52:27 AM
439 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
- 10/06/2011 11:55:01 AM
491 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
- 10/06/2011 11:58:36 AM
465 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
- 10/06/2011 12:16:46 PM
608 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
- 10/06/2011 12:19:16 PM
464 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
- 10/06/2011 12:25:08 PM
669 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
- 10/06/2011 12:26:30 PM
666 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
- 10/06/2011 12:28:45 PM
472 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
- 10/06/2011 12:29:43 PM
500 Views
Circumcision remains common among Christians mostly for symbolic reasons as well.
- 11/06/2011 10:48:48 AM
545 Views
Hm, I don't know. I don't think I know any non-Jews who are circumsized that see it as a symbol
- 11/06/2011 04:44:02 PM
622 Views
I took a holy dip into the Ganges
- 10/06/2011 11:48:26 AM
561 Views
Early Christians and Jews were obsessed with purity
- 10/06/2011 12:56:58 PM
595 Views
Oh, I know about the historical/academic/anthropological reason
- 10/06/2011 01:04:43 PM
534 Views
A first responce
- 10/06/2011 02:09:32 PM
659 Views
Do you want a theological answer or a historical one?
- 10/06/2011 03:16:44 PM
629 Views
The theological. I already had a fairly good idea of the historical
- 10/06/2011 03:18:51 PM
501 Views
My favorite fact about baptism is that is REQUIRES water... but it can be ANY water
- 10/06/2011 04:31:12 PM
593 Views
That is absurd.
- 10/06/2011 08:37:13 PM
687 Views
It is absurd
- 10/06/2011 08:56:19 PM
499 Views
When your post is eviscerated, resorting to "HURR RELIGION IS DUMB" isn't a winning move.
- 10/06/2011 10:00:39 PM
617 Views
Psh.You can dress it up with spiritualism and semantics, but the concept boils down to "magic water"
- 11/06/2011 03:56:03 AM
443 Views
The point is that it's a symbol.
- 11/06/2011 04:45:19 AM
470 Views
I have no problem with water as a symbol
- 11/06/2011 04:59:52 AM
541 Views
You are totally missing the point.
- 11/06/2011 02:46:08 PM
622 Views
Which again, is something that sounds nice and spiritual, but doesn't actually make any sense
- 11/06/2011 03:46:51 PM
588 Views
your problem is you're trying to apply objective logic to religion
- 11/06/2011 04:13:01 PM
843 Views
I'm not, exactly. Religion has internal logic. For example, certain things are "unclean"
- 11/06/2011 04:40:33 PM
488 Views
Beliefs about holy water are internally logical.
- 11/06/2011 07:36:08 PM
530 Views
Shrug. It was on topic.
- 11/06/2011 08:06:16 PM
811 Views
The more I read of your posts, the more I think you fundamentally misunderstand religious symbolism. *NM*
- 11/06/2011 10:51:17 PM
209 Views
Let me clarify: your statements are absurd.
- 10/06/2011 10:14:06 PM
507 Views
Check my response to Ghav for elaboration, but basically, your argument doesn't hold
- 11/06/2011 04:00:18 AM
489 Views
You went from saying spit was good to saying "clean water".
- 12/06/2011 02:04:26 AM
432 Views
I'm completely consistent. I was just staying away from extremes for conversation's sake.
- 12/06/2011 09:02:02 AM
470 Views
No one from a respectable faith thinks of holy water as "magic water". Period. *NM*
- 13/06/2011 04:56:53 AM
196 Views
All I know, Is a Lutheran Pastor told me, b/c i was not baptised I was going to hell, and had *NM*
- 11/06/2011 03:44:38 PM
187 Views
I never thought of it in that way, that is why I like this site 
*NM*
- 12/06/2011 04:26:40 PM
229 Views
*NM*
- 12/06/2011 04:26:40 PM
229 Views