I'm not informed enough to comment on most of this, but can someone explain that last line to me?
Aemon Send a noteboard - 08/06/2011 11:25:49 PM
...persons who show up at a hospital seeking treatment could be required to buy insurance on the spot.
I don't understand how this makes sense. If someone shows up at a hospital with no insurance, they're required to pay for their care, are they not? Obviously a lot of them are unable to do so, but calling the fee "insurance" instead of "hospital bill" won't change that fact. If it's simply a matter of a dollar amount (maybe they can afford insurance payments, but not the entirety of their bill), why not just have hospitals work out payments of whatever the person can afford? And don't they already do that?
Anyway, I guess I just don't follow this from an economic sense. If insurance payments are $100 per month, and a hospital bill is $1000, how is forcing someone to enroll in a $100 per month insurance program any different than forcing them to pay $100 per month towards their hospital bill?
ObamaCare's Legal Death Spiral Continues.....great news for America!
08/06/2011 10:04:24 PM
- 857 Views
I'm not informed enough to comment on most of this, but can someone explain that last line to me?
08/06/2011 11:25:49 PM
- 526 Views
just a guess but
08/06/2011 11:40:44 PM
- 390 Views
Yeah, and I guess that's what I was missing (see my response to Tom).
09/06/2011 07:13:00 AM
- 374 Views
A lot of the debate from the centered around how many of those people there are.
10/06/2011 01:15:19 AM
- 371 Views
"...the government mandate to have health insurance was unlike any law in American history"...
09/06/2011 05:24:56 AM
- 375 Views
wait....
09/06/2011 04:34:13 PM
- 421 Views
Guess what the "I" in FICA is; the Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance program is insurance
10/06/2011 12:34:04 AM
- 506 Views
if you want to opt out just work for a local government
09/06/2011 06:01:06 PM
- 359 Views
a few high profile cases does not equal "most" in any sense of the word *NM*
10/06/2011 02:38:26 AM
- 154 Views
Actually, there's an even more relevant example.
09/06/2011 08:01:18 PM
- 483 Views
That's the best link I've ever seen posted anywhere on the internet. *NM*
09/06/2011 08:26:02 PM
- 147 Views
That's a very flawed example
09/06/2011 09:06:24 PM
- 368 Views
Did you read the Act itself?
10/06/2011 04:04:39 PM
- 335 Views
Yes, did you get the 'foriegn port' part of sentence, or did you stop reading after the comma?
10/06/2011 06:11:27 PM
- 338 Views
Re: Yes, did you get the 'foriegn port' part of sentence, or did you stop reading after the comma?
10/06/2011 06:54:29 PM
- 344 Views
It might help if you clarified what your point is
10/06/2011 08:05:30 PM
- 339 Views
besides it was still just a condition for a specific job not a blanket requirement for breathing
10/06/2011 08:36:07 PM
- 351 Views
In other words, this is as "unprecedented" as filibustering Bush judicial nominees (i.e. it's not).
10/06/2011 12:55:17 AM
- 334 Views
Oh well. Living in a shit hole country is something I love and a chance to change that is BS.
12/06/2011 05:21:25 PM
- 343 Views