I don't think wikileaks personally did it ... sounds like some outside group acting in their stead .
The_Muted_Grimaud Send a noteboard - 02/06/2011 04:58:28 AM
I take it the new order for people who support Wikileaks is to hack any companies website that reports about wikileaks.
They hacked it not because PBS "reported" on Wikileaks, but because PBS did a negative reporting on it.
What difference does that make? Is Wikileaks setting the precedent that any negative report on someone justifies any retaliation by them?
Which is basically saying wikileaks has some sort of goon squad going for it. As well as the piracy-advocates. I forgot what article I was reading where some senator's x got hacked because he supported anti-piracy litigation.
PBS site hacked ...
- 01/06/2011 09:05:41 PM
409 Views
To be fair...
- 02/06/2011 12:19:07 AM
429 Views
Since when has there been any relationship whatsoever between Wikileaks and fairness?
- 02/06/2011 04:03:22 AM
281 Views
I don't think wikileaks personally did it ... sounds like some outside group acting in their stead .
- 02/06/2011 04:58:28 AM
270 Views