Active Users:801 Time:25/11/2024 01:14:26 AM
There's a certain irony in this exchange after my responses in another conversation about science Joel Send a noteboard - 07/05/2011 03:08:45 AM
Treating people who question an unproven scientific model that requires the complete restructuring of our energy policy like flat earthers is part of the reason people dig their heels in. There is a lot of good science behind and it deserves to be looked at but lets not treat doubters and like heathens.

Pointing out natural disasters to prove your point is laughable. Prove that there has been a marked increase or you are just another chicken little screaming the sky is falling. When your arguments can be as readily used to prove the coming Apocalypse you need to try again.

They may be as affronted by my attitude as I am by theirs, but that's neither here nor there to the evidence. Speaking of which, here's a Nature study of hurricane intensity increasing with warming oceans in five of the six ocean basins surveyed. The exception was the South Pacific, where Severe Tropical Cyclone Yasi set Australian records when it made landfall northwest of where Cyclone Anthony had four days earlier. One report said it was still a Cat 1 after it had traveled 600 km inland; to put that in perspective that's the equivalent of a hurricane making it from Houston to Abilene.

We know the planet's warming, we know it's producing more intense hurricanes (among other things) and we know the results will be catastrophes of varying degrees. The only debate now is whether and how much of a role humanity plays. Yet whether or not we accept and attempt to mitigate the cause(s), the need to mitigate the EFFECTS should be obvious now. The current situation is reminiscent of Appeasement in the '30s, when world leaders indulgently insisted the human and monetary costs of preventing disaster were less than those of recovering from it.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Are People still denying Climate Change? - 04/05/2011 02:28:36 AM 661 Views
i don't think there are many who deny climate change outright - 04/05/2011 02:43:43 AM 389 Views
People still deny the Moon landing, and that the Earth is round. - 04/05/2011 03:01:01 AM 679 Views
not is nothing the same and making arguments like that is part of the problem - 04/05/2011 05:37:50 PM 381 Views
There's a certain irony in this exchange after my responses in another conversation about science - 07/05/2011 03:08:45 AM 560 Views
Of course not. - 04/05/2011 05:13:00 AM 400 Views
Do you truly believe this? Obviously climates have always changed. Why would that stop? - 04/05/2011 07:10:55 AM 425 Views
You know he just likes to be contrary. - 04/05/2011 11:46:13 AM 386 Views
Let's put it this way. - 04/05/2011 03:34:25 PM 402 Views
Those who politically oppose it do, I fear *NM* - 04/05/2011 08:26:17 AM 165 Views
Just like those who were politcal drawn to it rushed to accept it as soon as they heard about it - 04/05/2011 05:23:07 PM 400 Views
I don't even see how it ever turned into a thing US conservatives refuse to accept - 04/05/2011 05:34:09 PM 415 Views
well since it is being used to promote what the liberals wanted it can't be surprising - 06/05/2011 04:47:41 PM 335 Views
We're not embracing it - 06/05/2011 04:52:30 PM 347 Views
Big business, and Big Oil in particular. - 07/05/2011 03:15:00 AM 427 Views
Climate Change? Yes - 04/05/2011 02:48:08 PM 489 Views
Part of the problem is the scientist decided to play priest - 04/05/2011 05:20:31 PM 436 Views
"Science" never said we were slipping into an ice age. - 07/05/2011 03:18:35 AM 312 Views
I do - 06/05/2011 12:39:08 PM 379 Views

Reply to Message