Interesting point. Might be more interesting if in anyway applied to what was being discussed. Most of what they were reporting on was either tweets or comments others were making about her. Of course we really were not talking about her complaining about the coverage were we? Do you think calling her a whore some how deflects from the obvious fact the Politico was out to get as evidenced by the almost daily attacks with no regard for the of the merit of the attacks? "We were not saying it wasn't her baby we were only reporting that others had said it". Sorry due but they have admitted to hating her.

I do find it ironic that you call her a whore in a thread where you were claiming no one was being misogynistic. Be the way having the media digging through your trash and reporting on the flavor of your latest farts doesn't make you a media whore. She is a public figure and has the right to make statements, if the far left liberals who run our media can't get over their juvenile hatred of a woman who doesn't fit the mold what they want a successful women to be and have driven themselves into a sophomoric hate frenzy it is hardly her fault.




Then you should spend less time reading nut jobs left wing conspiracy articles and watch some more main stream news. republicans get ask that question all the time. The left wing hacks who pose as journalist like to ask it because they are hopeing it will hurt the republican politicians with their base if they are forced to openly denounce a position that is held by a lot of members of their base. Of course beng left wing hacks who live in echochamberville they never really understood that almost no one cares about this issue. The media really isn't that sneaky with their bias and it takes a sheep not to see it. You may support their agenda but don't be a sheep and denying it. "four legs good two legs better"