Nice try.....care to explain why the same exact thing happened.....
trzaska2000 Send a noteboard - 16/04/2011 10:35:44 PM
.....after the JFK and GWB tax cuts? You see, biased libs like Krugman can try to "explain" away the data for one case, but I have 2 more examples of tax cuts increasing revenue.
3 for 3 - that's the power of my argument
I know that your liberal world is falling apart and you are trying to hang on to it will all of your might. But take a step back, think about all of this for a while. Knowledge is power.
3 for 3 - that's the power of my argument
I know that your liberal world is falling apart and you are trying to hang on to it will all of your might. But take a step back, think about all of this for a while. Knowledge is power.
*MySmiley*
Several basics facts about US Debt and Spending.....
16/04/2011 04:41:55 AM
- 1127 Views
Guess we should have okay'd those death panels for old people then. Big money saver. *NM*
16/04/2011 03:38:00 PM
- 331 Views
Balancing our budget would be easy.
16/04/2011 06:46:32 PM
- 581 Views
Several of those aren't as easy as you make it sound, but the import tax is a big no-no.
16/04/2011 07:34:30 PM
- 803 Views
Also on the buying drugs from Canada idea
16/04/2011 08:17:26 PM
- 691 Views
Funny you mentioned WWII and 1968. Can you put tax rates at these times as well?
16/04/2011 07:50:09 PM
- 1071 Views
Not really. Even if you can substantially raise tax revenue, the entitlement problem remains. *NM*
16/04/2011 08:25:26 PM
- 289 Views
Re: Not really. Even if you can substantially raise tax revenue, the entitlement problem remains.
16/04/2011 09:19:40 PM
- 735 Views
Have you ever looked at those projections for a decade or two hence?
16/04/2011 10:13:12 PM
- 676 Views
Yes I have
16/04/2011 10:44:50 PM
- 805 Views
Erm, and you think total health care spending is not getting out of control? I'm a little confused.
16/04/2011 11:02:52 PM
- 737 Views
Exactly. Cutting back on fraud and waste doesn't really put much of a dent in those projections. *NM*
17/04/2011 02:31:13 AM
- 271 Views
Sorry, but that is a stupid opinion.....
16/04/2011 08:38:35 PM
- 643 Views
Sounds like another bull.
16/04/2011 09:31:05 PM
- 912 Views
Dude, the data is the data.....tax revenue increased all three times.
16/04/2011 09:47:37 PM
- 852 Views
As I suspected, it's a bull.
16/04/2011 10:02:05 PM
- 785 Views
Stop being a fool - read and react to the data provided, posting something.....
16/04/2011 10:14:11 PM
- 545 Views
Response is
16/04/2011 10:19:00 PM
- 767 Views
Good lord.....it's like talking to a brick. I really hope you are 12 or 13.
16/04/2011 10:28:44 PM
- 761 Views
Re: Good lord.....it's like talking to a brick. I really hope you are 12 or 13.
16/04/2011 10:47:24 PM
- 722 Views
I take it you mean "rate of revenue growth decreases".
16/04/2011 11:11:19 PM
- 621 Views
It's not remarkable that revenue increased after the Reagan cuts.
17/04/2011 07:21:47 PM
- 945 Views
I've just noticed that you've provided charts from Heritage Foundation! Are you f.. kidding me?
16/04/2011 10:13:46 PM
- 643 Views
All the data is via CBO - do you know that the CBO is?
16/04/2011 10:16:08 PM
- 653 Views
Re: All the data is via CBO - do you know that the CBO is?
16/04/2011 10:27:01 PM
- 768 Views
Nice try.....care to explain why the same exact thing happened.....
16/04/2011 10:35:44 PM
- 582 Views
Re: Nice try.....care to explain why the same exact thing happened.....
16/04/2011 10:49:33 PM
- 711 Views
Krugman is a shill for the Obama administration.
17/04/2011 02:34:50 AM
- 594 Views
Re: Krugman is a shill for the Obama administration.
17/04/2011 03:50:24 AM
- 817 Views
Some obesrvations by Republican economists
18/04/2011 12:27:04 AM
- 951 Views
You mean the Keynesian economist who wrote The Failure of Reaganomics
18/04/2011 04:00:52 PM
- 584 Views
Re: You mean the Keynesian economist who wrote The Failure of Reaganomics
18/04/2011 05:36:44 PM
- 572 Views
You use Krugman and then complain about the Heritage Foundation! Are you f.. kidding me? *NM*
18/04/2011 02:46:47 AM
- 305 Views