Active Users:580 Time:06/11/2024 03:00:51 AM
Re: Ok so... I was stoned once, and reading Jung... Gaps Send a noteboard - 16/04/2011 01:49:51 AM
...and I came up with this awesome concept of souls, or the human idea of "souls", that I hesitate to share because I've used it myself in some short fiction. So - promise not to share it? I've copyrighted it. Additionally: I likely won't be able to explain it wonderfully, because I'm somewhat better in person (hard to believe, right?).

Anyway, Jung and Adler and Campbell (who is my newest Yoda, thanks to the heroic cycle and all his netflix lectures) all sort of think of humanity as sharing a sort of uber Jungian "collective unconscious", or a shared culture. See: motifs repeated independently of one another throughout dispersed peoples and cultures. Anyway, my basic metaphor for the soul is simple: human beings are each a sort of radio receptor for the shared, collective unconscious - our brains being the antenna - and the distinctive manner in which we receive the signal is what people classically refer to as "the soul". It's not some ethereal entity residing within us, but rather the way in which we interpret and recontribute the collective unconscious (i.e. culture, i.e. "God" ). This is sort of the same idea (though I guess, reversed) as the concept of the various pagan or Indian Gods being different representations of a singular God. Culture is everything: morals, religion, education, personality, and so on. And from a meta level (I constantly say to people "go meta", and hope that it sounds smart when I'm at a sticking point) we all share a culture, so our individual reception of that shared culture's signal (and/or the collective unconscious, which may be the only thing close to the human God) is what we would call the soul.

Anyway... I'm going to watch Tarkovsky now and hope I can snag some ~23 year old at the wedding I'm going to tomorrow.
I cannot even copy his manner because the manner of his prose was the manner of his thinking and that was a dazzling succession of gaps; and you cannot ape a gap because you are bound to fill it in somehow or other -- and blot it out in the process. -- Nabokov
Reply to message
What are souls? - 14/04/2011 03:49:56 AM 1122 Views
Re: What are souls? - 14/04/2011 06:15:36 AM 914 Views
Re: What are souls? - 15/04/2011 04:08:41 PM 971 Views
roger woolger and brian weiss have interesting books on this - 14/04/2011 06:24:01 AM 787 Views
Translating the word 'psyche' from Greek to English - 14/04/2011 08:37:30 AM 791 Views
I'm on the fence on souls - 14/04/2011 10:34:34 AM 749 Views
Re: I'm on the fence on souls - 15/04/2011 04:14:28 PM 980 Views
The million dollar quesiton - 14/04/2011 12:16:49 PM 844 Views
they are a type of fish and the bottom of the foot or shoe - 14/04/2011 02:57:30 PM 768 Views
I've always conceptualized.... - 14/04/2011 04:53:14 PM 740 Views
^ This ^ *NM* - 19/04/2011 01:47:36 AM 347 Views
Poetic construct. - 14/04/2011 07:07:53 PM 825 Views
My Soul (A Poem) - 14/04/2011 09:31:39 PM 704 Views
Re: Ok so... I was stoned once, and reading Jung... - 16/04/2011 01:49:51 AM 770 Views
Souls? I don't believe they exist. - 16/04/2011 02:05:01 AM 772 Views
It's strange... - 19/04/2011 01:04:57 AM 745 Views
That's because we're the same - 02/05/2011 05:51:15 AM 722 Views
That seems unlikely... - 02/05/2011 08:49:20 PM 708 Views
Re: What are souls? - 18/04/2011 11:38:40 PM 679 Views

Reply to Message