Example:
1) ExxonMobil
Campaign Contributions: Total Over 10 Years (2001-2010), $5.7 million
Lobbying Expenditures: Total Over 10 Years (2001-2010), $138 million
Government Contracts: $840 million in 2008; $6.8 billion from 2000-2008
Profits in 2009: $19 billion
Taxes Paid for 2009: $0
Tax Rebate for 2009: $156 million
Okay...the first three items are nice and easy to understand. The third item isn't. ExxonMobil is not one corporation, but a family of corporations. Some of those corporations aren't US corporations.
1) ExxonMobil
Campaign Contributions: Total Over 10 Years (2001-2010), $5.7 million
Lobbying Expenditures: Total Over 10 Years (2001-2010), $138 million
Government Contracts: $840 million in 2008; $6.8 billion from 2000-2008
Profits in 2009: $19 billion
Taxes Paid for 2009: $0
Tax Rebate for 2009: $156 million
Okay...the first three items are nice and easy to understand. The third item isn't. ExxonMobil is not one corporation, but a family of corporations. Some of those corporations aren't US corporations.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
How can anyone seriously support Obama's budget proposals?
14/04/2011 02:49:30 PM
- 1090 Views
I agree with your overall point but I do question one of your facts
14/04/2011 03:25:25 PM
- 577 Views
Using IRS data for 2008: (most recent year for which data is available)
14/04/2011 03:45:20 PM
- 597 Views
You didn't interpret the spreadsheet correctly. I'm positive of that.
14/04/2011 06:08:39 PM
- 460 Views
I'm gonna have to jump on board the wagon with that being a bad figure, got some others
14/04/2011 07:33:14 PM
- 629 Views
Data: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/08in31mt.xls *NM*
14/04/2011 08:32:42 PM
- 238 Views
That's a breakdown of who modifies their returns and how it affects revenue.
14/04/2011 09:15:21 PM
- 452 Views
I believe you are questioning one of my definitions, not one of my facts.
14/04/2011 04:36:35 PM
- 512 Views
No matter how you define it I think it would be hard to call the top 5% middle class
14/04/2011 05:03:33 PM
- 524 Views
What a load of crap!
14/04/2011 03:49:29 PM
- 673 Views
Yes, your response is a load of crap.
14/04/2011 04:55:20 PM
- 574 Views
Re: Yes, your response is a load of crap.
14/04/2011 05:13:14 PM
- 654 Views
This is our first war without a tax increase.
14/04/2011 06:05:43 PM
- 576 Views
"Artful Dodgers"
14/04/2011 06:30:58 PM
- 515 Views
Not giving me the information I need
14/04/2011 09:33:36 PM
- 503 Views
Er, check facts
14/04/2011 05:04:02 PM
- 703 Views
Yeah, lets fact check
14/04/2011 05:43:34 PM
- 555 Views
You understand you're actually supposed to cite data for a fact check right?
14/04/2011 06:38:22 PM
- 717 Views
I'm not sure thats entirely right
14/04/2011 05:51:18 PM
- 733 Views
What about the farm subsidies and the military?
15/04/2011 04:54:54 PM
- 543 Views
Cutting the military isn't enough
16/04/2011 04:27:11 AM
- 483 Views
Defense is 60% of the discretionary budget as well, so it's more like 26% overall. Just sayin'. *NM*
16/04/2011 04:53:30 AM
- 243 Views